중국어 동결식의 논항 실현과 사역 연쇄
A Reconsideration of Argument Realization of Chinese RVCs Based on the Causal Chain
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is generally accepted that argument realization of resultative verb compounds in Chinese is one of the most difficult problems in RVC research. The causal chain theory, proposed by Croft (2012), argues that the initiator and the endpoint of the transmission of the force in the causal chain are realized as the subject and the object, respectively. Based on this theory, I simplify and effectively explain the mechanism of RVC’s argument realization: among the various participants related to the two RVC verbs, the elements acting as the initiator and the endpoint in the profiled segment of the causal chain are realized as the RVC’s subject and object, respectively. Additionally, the causal chain theory also provides a convincing theoretical basis to solve some of the challenges of RVCs, including the intransitive RVCs, the transitive RVCs with the second verb (i.e., buyu) not indicating its object (i.e., the so-called shadow argument), the reversed RVC and the like.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that argument realization of resultative verb compounds in Chinese is one of the most difficult problems in RVC research. The causal chain theory, proposed by Croft (2012), argues that the initiator and the endpoint of the transmission of the force in the causal chain are realized as the subject and the object, respectively. Based on this theory, I simplify and effectively explain the mechanism of RVC’s argument realization: among the various participants related to the two RVC verbs, the elements acting as the initiator and the endpoint in the profiled segment of the causal chain are realized as the RVC’s subject and object, respectively. Additionally, the causal chain theory also provides a convincing theoretical basis to solve some of the challenges of RVCs, including the intransitive RVCs, the transitive RVCs with the second verb (i.e., buyu) not indicating its object (i.e., the so-called shadow argument), the reversed RVC and the like.
참고문헌 (23)
- 오유정, "한어 동결식의 조선어 표현양상 및 의미기능 분석", 중국조선어문, 3, pp.49~53 (2017), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 오유정, "동결식과 진행상의 공기: 상 윤곽 및 상적 해석의 개념을 바탕으로", 중국학논총, (57), pp.57~80 (2017), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 郭銳, "現代漢語配價語法研究", pp.168~191 (1995), 北京大學出版社
- 董秀芳, "述補帶賓句式中的韻律制約", 語言研究, 1, pp.55~62 (1998), 华中科技大学
- 李小榮, "對述結式帶賓語功能的考察", 漢語學習, 5, pp.32~38 (1994), 延边大学
- 施春宏, "漢語動結式的句法語義研究" (2008), 北京語言大學出版社
- 宋文輝, "再論漢語所謂“倒置動結式”的性質和特征", 外國語, 41(5), pp.48~60 (2018), 上海外国语大学
- 延俊榮, "動結式“V+Rv”帶賓語情況考察", 漢語學習, 5, pp.29~31 (2002), 延边大学
- 王紅旗, "現代漢語配價語法硏究" (1995), 北京大學出版社
- 熊仲儒, "動結式的致事選擇", 安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學版), 32(4), pp.471~476 (2004), 安徽师范大学
- 熊仲儒, "動結式的論元實現", 現代外语, 29(2), pp.120~130 (2006), 广东外语外贸大学
- 袁毓林, "述結式配價的控制—還原分析", 中國語文, 5, pp.399~410 (2001), 中国社会科学院语言研究所
- 張黎, "漢語"動作一結果"的句法呈現及其認知類型學的解釋", 對外漢語研究, 1, pp.32~41 (2010), 上海师范大学对外语学院
- 张翼, "致使語義的概念化和句法表征", 外國語, 37(4), pp.81~87 (2014), 上海外国语大学
- 张翼, "廣義動結式倒置用法的允准：基於極量義和範疇化的解釋", 外國語, 39(4), pp.2~9 (2016), 上海外国语大学
- Croft, W., "Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations : The Cognitive Organization of Information" (1991), University of Chicago Press
- Croft, W., "Verbs : Aspect and Causal Structure" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, R. W., "Cognitive Grammar : A Basic Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Simpson, J., "Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar", pp.143~157 (1983), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Talmy, L., "The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Syntax and Semantics 6", pp.43~116 (1976), Academic Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I, Vol. Ⅱ" (2000), MIT Press