三國志演義 初期 텍스트 연구― 3種 朝鮮唯一本 포함 諸版本對校例에 대한 분석을 중심으로

Abstract

In this paper, I comprehensively present the conclusions obtained through the work of a comparative texual criticism between 6 to 11 editions of Romance of the Three Kingdoms(limited to the remaining parts of Chosun Metal Type Edition). This is a close sympathetic work of the early editions of the present Three Kingdoms, and in particular, it contains all of the editions which that had not been fully studied. Based on this, I tried to review the relevant academic issues surrounding the genealogy of the early editions of Three Kingdoms. In Chapter 2, we first demonstrate that Jiajing Edition is the isolated edition and that the text of the existing AB-series edition is, in part, farther away from the original text than the existing CD-series edition. Then, at the end, I presented two methodologies for analyzing the genealogy of existing AB series editions. Section 1 of Chapter 3 has argued why Chosun Metal Type Edition belongs to the AB-series. In Section 2, we first demonstrate that Jiajing Edition belongs to a different series from Shanghai Folios and Chosun Metal Type Edition, and the reason why Shanghai Folios belongs to the AB-series, and the reference version of Zhou Yuexiao Edition-A(Probably Shanghai Folios), and why Zhou Yuexiao Edition-A precedes Zhou Yuexiao Edition-B and Zhou Yuexiao Edition-C. Section 3 demonstrated that Xia Zhenyu Edition is older than Zhou Yuexiao Edition. To summarize the significance of this paper, it is clear that the common conclusions of scholars represented by Andrew West have once again been proved by the method of text critisism. In addition, by the work of incorporating several of the above editions, which had not been sufficiently studied in the past, we have further elaborated the genealogy of the AB-series of Three Kingdoms and have made some corrections to that part of Andrew West’s the genealogy of the AB-series.