이중 목적어 구조의 다의성
The Polysemy of Double Object Constructions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper addresses the different meanings of double object constructions. Verbs of <giving> take X and H as its objects to constitute {A v<giving> H X} meaning “A transfer X to H,” while verbs of <taking-away> constitute {A v<taking-away> H X} meaning “A transfer X from H.” Non <giving> verbs in DOCs are classified into four different semantic categories; <<sending>giving> verbs, <<preparing>giving> verbs, <<getting>giving> verbs, and <<producing>giving> verbs. Non <taking -away> verbs in DOCs are grouped into two different categories; <taking-away<getting>> and <taking-away<losing>> verbs. Write, a <producing> verb or <sending> verb in monotransitive constructions, takes X and H as its objects to constitute either {A v<<sending>giving> H X} as in He wrote her a poem or {A v<<producing>giving> H X} as in He wrote her a letter, exemplifying lexical ambiguity. A <getting> verb, steal takes X and H as its objects to constitute either {A v<<getting>giving> H X} as in Steal me a mink for my birthday or {A v<taking-away<getting>> H X} as in He stole me a mink for his wife’s birthday, exemplifying structural ambiguity.
Abstract
This paper addresses the different meanings of double object constructions. Verbs of <giving> take X and H as its objects to constitute {A v<giving> H X} meaning “A transfer X to H,” while verbs of <taking-away> constitute {A v<taking-away> H X} meaning “A transfer X from H.” Non <giving> verbs in DOCs are classified into four different semantic categories; <<sending>giving> verbs, <<preparing>giving> verbs, <<getting>giving> verbs, and <<producing>giving> verbs. Non <taking -away> verbs in DOCs are grouped into two different categories; <taking-away<getting>> and <taking-away<losing>> verbs. Write, a <producing> verb or <sending> verb in monotransitive constructions, takes X and H as its objects to constitute either {A v<<sending>giving> H X} as in He wrote her a poem or {A v<<producing>giving> H X} as in He wrote her a letter, exemplifying lexical ambiguity. A <getting> verb, steal takes X and H as its objects to constitute either {A v<<getting>giving> H X} as in Steal me a mink for my birthday or {A v<taking-away<getting>> H X} as in He stole me a mink for his wife’s birthday, exemplifying structural ambiguity.
참고문헌 (24)
- 전기정, "二重目的語 構文의 述語動詞 考察", 중국어문학, 42(42) (2003), 영남중국어문학회
- 박한기, "동사 play의 의미와 구문윤곽", 영어영문학, 52(3), pp.455~481 (2006), 한국영어영문학회
- 박한기, "TAKE의 이중목적어 구조", 영어영문학21, 24(4), pp.217~236 (2011), 21세기영어영문학회
- 박한기, "이중목적어 동사의 분포", 영어영문학21, 25(3), pp.137~185 (2012), 21세기영어영문학회
- 박한기, "<제거>의 이중 목적어 구조", 영어영문학21, 26(4), pp.205~225 (2013), 21세기영어영문학회
- 박현석, "최소이론에 의한 영어 이중목적어 구문 분석", 영어영문학연구, 35(1), pp.253~269 (2009), 대한영어영문학회
- 송석만, "영어 이중목적어 구문의 의미적ㆍ화용적 분석’", 영미어문학연구, 19(1), pp.131~114 (2003), 영미어문학회
- 이종근, "영어 타동사의 통사의미적 속성과 논항 선택", 영어영문학연구, 32(2), pp.247~266 (2006), 대한영어영문학회
- 이봉선, "사슬동사의 두 구조", 영어영문학연구, 30(1), pp.203~14 (2004), 대한영어영문학회
- Beck, S., "Double objects again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.97~123 (2002)
- Bresnan, J., "Categories and Gradiences in Dative Alternation", 석사, pp.2003
- Driven, R., "Metonymy in language and thought" (1999), Amsterdam Benjamins
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg. A. E., "Surface Generalizations: An Alternative to alternation", Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), pp.327~356 (2002)
- Gropen, J., "The Learnability and Acqusition of the Dative Alternation in English", Language, 65, pp.203~257 (1989)
- Hudson, R., "So Called Double Objects and Grammatical Relations", Language, 68, pp.251~276 (1992)
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Structures" (1990), MIT-Press
- Kovecses, Z., "Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View", Cognitive Linguistics, 9, pp.37~77 (1998)
- ngacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, R. W., "Concept, image, and symbol" (2002), Mouton deGruyter
- Larson, R., "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Pesetsky, D., "Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades" (1995), The MIT Press
- Pinker, S., "The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English", Language, 65(2), pp.203~257 (1989)
- Pylkkanen, L., "Introducing Arguments", 박사, pp.2002