On the Distribution of Semantic Classes of Dative Verbs in Syntactic Constructions in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It has been observed that only a small subset of dative verbs that can express causation of possession such as cwu- ‘give’, ceykongha- ‘offer’ and cikupha- ‘pay’may be found in the double accusative construction in Korean. This paper presents a semantic account of Korean dative verbs and constructions that can correctly predict the distribution of semantic classes of dative verbs in the DAT-ACC and double accusative constructions. I argue that a satisfactory analysis of this distribution requires fine-grained distinctions among dative verbs: (i) verbs that lexicalize just caused possession (pure caused possession verbs), (ii) verbs that lexicalize transfer of possession (transfer of possession verbs) and (iii) verbs that lexicalize caused motion (caused motion verbs). I show that once these distinctions are recognized, verb distribution in the two dative constructions follows naturally from a general compatibility condition which requires identity in event type between verbs and constructions.
Abstract
It has been observed that only a small subset of dative verbs that can express causation of possession such as cwu- ‘give’, ceykongha- ‘offer’ and cikupha- ‘pay’may be found in the double accusative construction in Korean. This paper presents a semantic account of Korean dative verbs and constructions that can correctly predict the distribution of semantic classes of dative verbs in the DAT-ACC and double accusative constructions. I argue that a satisfactory analysis of this distribution requires fine-grained distinctions among dative verbs: (i) verbs that lexicalize just caused possession (pure caused possession verbs), (ii) verbs that lexicalize transfer of possession (transfer of possession verbs) and (iii) verbs that lexicalize caused motion (caused motion verbs). I show that once these distinctions are recognized, verb distribution in the two dative constructions follows naturally from a general compatibility condition which requires identity in event type between verbs and constructions.
참고문헌 (43)
- 류병래, "한국어 ‘다시’의 중의성: 전제 기반 어휘 분석", 언어, 43(4), pp.695~720 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Barlow, Michael, "Usage-based Models of Grammar" (2000), CSLI Publications
- Beavers, John, "An Aspectual Analysis of Ditransitive Verbs of Caused possession in English", Journal of Semantics, 28(1), pp.1~54 (2011)
- Beavers, John, "Possession of a Controlled Substantive: Have and Other Verbs of Possession", pp.108~125 (2009), Cornell University
- Beck, Sigrid, "Double Objects Again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(1), pp.97~123 (2004)
- Cho, Eun., "Morphosyntax in Generative Grammar", pp.113~122 (1996), Hankuk Publishing
- Ghomeshi, Jila, "Lexical", Syntactic Relations without Projection, 1995, pp.24(3-4), 175~217
- Goldberg, Adele., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg, Adele., "Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning" (1997), John Benjamins
- Goldberg, Adele., "Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Gruber, Jeffrey., "Studies in Lexical Relations", pp.1965
- Harley, Heidi., "Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2", pp.31~70 (2002), John Benjamins
- Hong, Ki-Sun., "Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean", pp.1991
- Jackendoff, Ray., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- Jackendoff, Ray., "Semantics and Cognition" (1983), MIT Press
- Jelinek, Eloise, "Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar", pp.265~296 (2003), John Benjamins
- Jung, Yeun-Jin, "Decomposing Ditransitive Verbs", Proceedings of SICGC, pp.101~120 (2004)
- Barlow, Michael, "Usage-based Models of Grammar" (2000), CSLI Publications
- Kim, Lan, "Asymmetric Ditransitive Constructions: Evidence from Korean", Lingua, 165(A), pp.28~69 (2015)
- Koenig, Jean-Pierre, "Sublexical Modality and the Structure of Lexical Semantic Representations", Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(1), pp.71~124 (2001)
- Landau, Barbara, "Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child" (1985), Harvard University Press
- Langacker, Ronald, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Applications", pp.2~ (1991), CSLI Publications
- 이두원, "Accusative-marked Indirect Objects with Ownership", 생성문법연구, 17(1), pp.1~21 (2007), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 이한정, "Two types of variation in the morphosyntactic expression of recipients of dative verbs in Korean", 언어연구, 35(3), pp.449~482 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Levin, Beth., "Verbs and Constructions: Where Next?", Western Conference on Linguistics (2004), University of Southern California
- Levin, Beth, "Dative Verbs: A Crosslinguistic Perspective", Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 31(2), pp.285~312 (2008)
- Levin, Beth., "Dative Verbs and Dative Alternations from a Crosslinguistic Perspective", Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, ~ (2008)
- Levin, Beth., "The Semantic Bases of Japanese and Korean Ditransitives", The 20th Conference on Japanese, 2010, ~
- Levin, Beth, "Argument Realization" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Michaelis, Laura, "Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Model of the German Applicative" (2001), CSLI Publications
- Miller, George, "Language and Perception" (1976), Harvard University Press
- Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13(1), pp.1~38 (2004)
- Oehrle, Richard, "Review of Georgia M. Green: Semantics and Syntactic Regularity", Language, 53(1), pp.198~208 (1977)
- Park, Sang Doh, "Direct Movement Passives in Korean and Japanese", Japanese, 2003, pp.12, 307~321[DOI]
- Pesetsky, David., "Zero Syntax" (1995), MIT Press
- Pinker, Steven., "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
- Rappaport Hovav, Malka, "The English Dative Alternation: A Case for Verb Sensitivity", Journal of Linguistics, 44(1), pp.129~167 (2008)
- Reddy, Michael., "Metaphor and Thought", pp.284~324 (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Sohn, Ho-Min., "The Korean Language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Taylor, John., "Possessives in English" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Tham, Shiao Wei., "Representing Possessive Predication: Semantic Dimensions and Pragmatic Bases", pp.2004
- Vikner, Carl, "A Semantic Analysis of the English Genitive. Interaction of Lexical and Formal Semantics", Studia Linguistica, 56(2), pp.191~226 (2002)
- 윤소연, "Correlation between semantic compatibility and frequency: A usage-based approach", 언어연구, 30(2), pp.243~272 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]