군형법상 명령위반죄의 문제점과 개선방안
The Problem and Improvement of Violation of an Order in Military Criminal Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Article 47, Military Criminal Act of Korea provides that a person violates or fails to obey any justifiable general order or regulation shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than two years(Amended by Act No. 9820, Nov. 2, 2009). Although this provision has been right and just, both the interpretation and the application must be careful not to make an arbitrary decision and refrain from making a board interpretation. In this respect, this clause is too vague. Especially, it is not clear concept, content and legislator of 'order or regulation'. Nevertheless, The Constitutional Court of Korea and The Supreme Court of Korea has handed down its decision with constitutional. However, this trend requires special attention, the Constitutional Court of Korea ruled in 1995 and 2011 that Violation of an Order was indeed unconstitutional, with four out of its nine justices speaking in one voice for the stated 'second violation of an order judgment'. Article 47 have a matter of great problem in relation to the principal of 'nulla poena sine lege'. Therefore, an immediate revision of this provision is needed. In conclusion, Article 47 should be abolished. The contents of 'order or regulation' which has ruled under Violation of an Order should be dealt to add a clause or disobedience.
Abstract
Article 47, Military Criminal Act of Korea provides that a person violates or fails to obey any justifiable general order or regulation shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than two years(Amended by Act No. 9820, Nov. 2, 2009). Although this provision has been right and just, both the interpretation and the application must be careful not to make an arbitrary decision and refrain from making a board interpretation. In this respect, this clause is too vague. Especially, it is not clear concept, content and legislator of 'order or regulation'. Nevertheless, The Constitutional Court of Korea and The Supreme Court of Korea has handed down its decision with constitutional. However, this trend requires special attention, the Constitutional Court of Korea ruled in 1995 and 2011 that Violation of an Order was indeed unconstitutional, with four out of its nine justices speaking in one voice for the stated 'second violation of an order judgment'. Article 47 have a matter of great problem in relation to the principal of 'nulla poena sine lege'. Therefore, an immediate revision of this provision is needed. In conclusion, Article 47 should be abolished. The contents of 'order or regulation' which has ruled under Violation of an Order should be dealt to add a clause or disobedience.
참고문헌 (21)
- 권기훈, "명령위반죄 적용상의 문제점에 관한 소고 - 특히 군무이탈자 복귀명령과 관련하여-", 군사법논문집, 9 (1990), 공군본부
- 김석영, "군형법 제47조(명령위반죄)는 위헌인가", 군사법논문집, 13 (1994), 공군본부
- 김오원, "군형법상 명령위반죄에 관한 판례연구", 석사, pp.1975
- 김이수, "명령위반죄의 유형별 연구", 군사법논집, 1 (1983), 육군본부
- 박상열, "항명죄와 명령위반죄의 구별", 군사법연구, 1 (1982), 육군본부
- 박찬걸, "군형법상 추행죄의 문제점과 개선방안", 한양법학, (35)통권 : 35, pp.73~104 (2011), 한양법학회
- 박찬걸, "군형법상 군무이탈죄와 관련된 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책, 22(1), pp.209~231 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
- 송문일, "군형법 제47조를 비판한다", 군사법논집, 1 (1983), 육군본부
- 송문호, "군형법과 ‘제복을 입은 시민’", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.375~396 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 오병두, "군형법의 문제점과 개정방향", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.9~32 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 육군본부 법무실, "군형법주해" (2011), 국군인쇄창
- 육군종합행정학교, "군형법" (2011), 제6지구인쇄소
- 이만종, "군형사법 적용에 있어서의 문제점: 개정 군형법 및 군사법원법을 중심으로", 법학논집, 2 (1996), 조선대학교 법학연구소
- 이상석, "군형법상 항명죄에 있어서 명령의 의미", 군사법연구, 10 (1992), 육군본부
- 이상철, "군사법원론" (2011), 박영사
- 이승호, "군형법의 문제점과 개정방향에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 이진우, "입법론적 견지에서 본 군형법상의 문제점", 검찰, (52) (1973), 대검찰청
- 이진우, "군형법" (1973), 법문사
- 조윤, "군형법개정론", 사법논집, 2 (1972), 법원행정처
- 지대남, "군사법원론" (2008), 대명사
- 한위수, "군형법 제47조(명령위반)의 문제점과 판례동향에 대한 소고", 군사법연구, 2 (1984), 육군본부
