본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

군형법 제92조의5 추행죄의 위헌성과 폐지론

The Unconstitutionality of the Crime of Sodomy in Military Criminal Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Article 92-5, Military Penal Code of Korea(MPCK) regulates "sodomy or any other sexual contacts between military service members" as a crime. This provision applies whether the sexual conduct is consensual or nonconsensual. In 2002 the Constitutional Court of Korea held it is not unconstitutional. This paper argues firstly that the provision is too vague to specify the scope of punishable conducts. Article 92-5 applies mainly to the homosexual sodomy. But it is not clear whether that provision applies to all of sexual contacts between military members, including sodomy. The Supreme Court of Korea held that 'any other sexual conduct' under the Article 92-5 is limited to 'abnormal sexual contact pursuing sexual satisfaction'. However, such interpretation is not successful to overcome the vagueness of this provision. Moreover, necessity of such a limited interpretation through 'abnormal' and 'pursuing sexual satisfaction' is not based upon reasonable arguments. On the other hand, it is not clear whether Article 92-5 also applies to the heterosexual sodomy or other sexual contacts ; whether it regulates only sexual contacts in public or it prohibits even sexual contacts committed in private. Therefore, this paper argues that the Article 92-5 is unconstitutional because of its vagueness. Second point of this paper is that such a broad restriction violates the constitutional right to privacy and sexual self-determination excessively, so is unconstitutional. It is said that the Article 92-5 serves to maintain the military order and strong force. However, no case suggests that allowing military members to engage in consensual sexual contact would detract from the military's ability to meet this objective. My conclusion is that the need for maintaining a strict order in the military do not overweigh a military member's fundamental right to privacy and sexual self-determination. So the Article 92-5 which prohibits consensual sexual contacts between military service members should be abolished.

Abstract

Article 92-5, Military Penal Code of Korea(MPCK) regulates "sodomy or any other sexual contacts between military service members" as a crime. This provision applies whether the sexual conduct is consensual or nonconsensual. In 2002 the Constitutional Court of Korea held it is not unconstitutional. This paper argues firstly that the provision is too vague to specify the scope of punishable conducts. Article 92-5 applies mainly to the homosexual sodomy. But it is not clear whether that provision applies to all of sexual contacts between military members, including sodomy. The Supreme Court of Korea held that 'any other sexual conduct' under the Article 92-5 is limited to 'abnormal sexual contact pursuing sexual satisfaction'. However, such interpretation is not successful to overcome the vagueness of this provision. Moreover, necessity of such a limited interpretation through 'abnormal' and 'pursuing sexual satisfaction' is not based upon reasonable arguments. On the other hand, it is not clear whether Article 92-5 also applies to the heterosexual sodomy or other sexual contacts ; whether it regulates only sexual contacts in public or it prohibits even sexual contacts committed in private. Therefore, this paper argues that the Article 92-5 is unconstitutional because of its vagueness. Second point of this paper is that such a broad restriction violates the constitutional right to privacy and sexual self-determination excessively, so is unconstitutional. It is said that the Article 92-5 serves to maintain the military order and strong force. However, no case suggests that allowing military members to engage in consensual sexual contact would detract from the military's ability to meet this objective. My conclusion is that the need for maintaining a strict order in the military do not overweigh a military member's fundamental right to privacy and sexual self-determination. So the Article 92-5 which prohibits consensual sexual contacts between military service members should be abolished.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Aaron Belkin, "Don't Ask and Don't Tell : Is the Gay Ban based on Military Necessity?", Parameter, (summer), pp.110~114 (2003)
  2. Herek, "Sexual Orientation and Military Service, In Military Life : The Psychology of Serving in Peace and Combat" (2006), Greenwood Press
  3. Major Eugene E. Baime, ""Private consensual sodomy should be constitutionally protected in the military by the right to privacy", Military Law Review, 171, pp.91~ (2002)
  4. 고재열, "군은 동성애자 인권의 사각지대", 시사저널 (2000)
  5. 국가인권정책기본계획 권고안, "국가인권위원회", 92~95 (2006)
  6. 국가인권위원회, "군형법 제92조에 대한 위헌법률심판(2008헌가21)에 대한 의견제출", ~ (2010)
  7. 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임, "군사법 관련 6개 법안에 대한 의견서", 15~ (2006)
  8. 송문호, "군형법과 ‘제복을 입은 시민’", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.375~396 (2009), 한국형사법학회
  9. 오병두, "군형법의 문제점과 개정방향", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.9~32 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
  10. 이경환, "군대 내 동성애 행위 처벌에 대하여", 공익과 인권, 5(1), pp.73~ (2008), 서울대 공익인권법센터
  11. 외국 군 인사·복무 관련 법령 및 제도 등 실태조사 - 독일의 법령과 제도를 중심으로 -, 국가인권위원회 2006년 인권상황실태조사 연구용역 보고서, "이계수", 21~ (2006)
  12. 이호중, "성폭력범죄의 친고죄 폐지론, In 성폭력, 법정에 서다", pp.219~255 (2007), 푸른사상
  13. 한채윤, "벽장비우기 - 레즈비언 섹슈얼리티와 이성애주의, In 섹슈얼리티 강의, 두 번째", pp.249~270 (2006), 동녘
  14. "헌재 2002.6.27, 2001헌바70", 판례집, 14(1), pp.601~613 (2002)
  15. "헌재 2002.6.27. 선고 2001헌바70", 판례집, 14(1), pp.601~610 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)