군형법의 문제점과 개정방향
The Military Criminal Law of Korea: Its Problematics and de lege ferenda
0
조회
0
다운로드
32
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article deals with the problems of the Military Criminal Law of Korea(hereinafter as “KMCL”) and de lege ferenda thereof. The KCML was enacted after the provisions of the Army Criminal Law and the Navy Criminal Law of Japan, criticized for its militaristic characters and done away with after the World War Ⅱ. Since its legisla- tion of 1962 by the military government, KMCL has been revised 6 times. Its revisions were promoted mainly by the military authorities and civil society didn't pay sufficient attention to them. Thus, whenever it has been revised, KMCL has got more and harsher punitive clauses without any satisfactory grounds. As lately as 2005, a new bill for the revision of KMCL was introduced into the National Assembly, but not passed through. It has the same traits as its precursors. The problems of KMCL could be summarized as follows: firstly, above all, its punishments are too severe for the crime. Secondly, it has too many clauses involving death penalty. Thirdly, it has too many punitive clauses which apply to the citizen. Finally, it hat almost no provisions for, if at all too lenient to, the higher officers’ abuses of the power. The legislative suggestions for KMCL are that the harsh punishment and death penalty be readjusted according to and comparing with the non-military criminal law, that unnecessary punitive clauses be decriminal- ized, that those clauses which apply to the citizen be abolished, and that provisions be made for the abuses of the higher officers’ power.
Abstract
This article deals with the problems of the Military Criminal Law of Korea(hereinafter as “KMCL”) and de lege ferenda thereof. The KCML was enacted after the provisions of the Army Criminal Law and the Navy Criminal Law of Japan, criticized for its militaristic characters and done away with after the World War Ⅱ. Since its legisla- tion of 1962 by the military government, KMCL has been revised 6 times. Its revisions were promoted mainly by the military authorities and civil society didn't pay sufficient attention to them. Thus, whenever it has been revised, KMCL has got more and harsher punitive clauses without any satisfactory grounds. As lately as 2005, a new bill for the revision of KMCL was introduced into the National Assembly, but not passed through. It has the same traits as its precursors. The problems of KMCL could be summarized as follows: firstly, above all, its punishments are too severe for the crime. Secondly, it has too many clauses involving death penalty. Thirdly, it has too many punitive clauses which apply to the citizen. Finally, it hat almost no provisions for, if at all too lenient to, the higher officers’ abuses of the power. The legislative suggestions for KMCL are that the harsh punishment and death penalty be readjusted according to and comparing with the non-military criminal law, that unnecessary punitive clauses be decriminal- ized, that those clauses which apply to the citizen be abolished, and that provisions be made for the abuses of the higher officers’ power.
참고문헌 (29)
- 日高巳雄, "新法学全集. 第19巻", pp.4~ (1938), 日本評論社
- 조두현, "군법개설", pp.26~, 일신사
- 임덕규, "군법개론(개정판)", pp.8~ (1987), 일신사
- 고등군사법원, "군형법해설서", pp.4~ (2005)
- 외국 군 인사‧복무 관련 법령 및 제도 등 실태조사―독일의 법령과 제도를 중심으로―, In 2006년도 인권상황실태조사 연구용역 보고서, "이계수", 국가인권위원회, 64~ (2006)
- 박주범, "외국의 군사법원‧군사법원의 존립목적, In 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임, 군 사법 개혁을 위한 토론회 자료집", pp.23~ (2003), 16
- 백재구, "군형법강의", pp.16~ (1962), 선경도서출판사
- 최경옥, "미군정하의 국방경비법의 유래와 변천― 朝鮮(國防)警備法朝鮮海岸警備法(1946년) 자료 발굴에 즈음하여―", 공법연구, 35(2), pp.267~306 (2006), 한국공법학회
- 문준영, "미군정 법령체제와 국방경비법", 민주법학, (34), pp.97~136 (2007), 민주주의법학연구회
- 태윤기, "군형법안에 대한 고찰―특히 그 적용범위에 관하여―(상)", 법률신문 제255호, ~ (1957)
- 이진우, "군형법", pp.32~ (1962), 법문사
- 이근상, "군형법개요", 법제월보, 4(1), pp.28~ (1962)
- 조윤, "군형법 개정론", 사법논집, 2, pp.435~ (1972)
- 林 博史, "沖縄戦における脫走兵について", 戦争責任研究, (26), pp.73~ (1999)
- 이진우, "입법론적 견지에서 본 군형법상의 문제점", 대검찰청, (52), pp.145~ (1973)
- 오준수, "개정된 군사법원법 및 군형법의 문제점 소고", 군사법논문집, 14, pp.33~ (1995)
- 이만종, "군형사법 운용에 있어서의 문제점―개정 군형법 및 군사법원법을 중심으로", 법학논총, 2, pp.181~ (1996), 조선대학교법학연구소
- 사법개혁위원회, "사법개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅵ)", pp.551~ (2005)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "사법제도개혁추진위원회 의결현황", 243~ (2006)
- "군사법설명자료"[URL]
- Joseph T. Gasper II, "The Road Not Taken: Decriminalizing Private Consensual Sodomy in the Military", Howard Law Journal, pp.162~ (2005)
- 태윤기, "군형법안에 대한 고찰―특히 그 적용범위에 관하여―(하)", 법률신문, ~ (1957)
- 송기춘, "평택미군기지이전과 관련한 군사시설보호구역지정의 위법성과 일반국민에 대한 군형법 적용의 문제", 민주법학, (31), pp.171~198 (2006), 민주주의법학연구회
- 강영훈, "군사법개설(수정판)", pp.282~ (2006), 연경문화사
- 장병 기본권 지침 연구, 한국국방연구원 연구보고서, "김광식", 52~ (2006)
- 강영훈, "군사법개설(수정판)", pp.322~ (2006), 연경문화사
- 윤성근, "비행군기 문란죄에 관한 고찰", 군사법논문집, (5), pp.186~ (1986)
- 송성룡, "군형법상의 군용물 관련 과실범에 관하여, In 공군사관학교, 논문집 제57집 제3권", pp.133~ (2006)