Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal connection type implants after cyclic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study was conducted with internal type implants of two different manufacturers (Group Os, De). Fourteen assemblies were prepared for each manufacturer group and divided into 2 groups (n=7): prefabricated abutments (Os-P, De-P) and CAD/CAM abutments (Os-C, De-C). The amount of axial displacement and the removal torque values (RTVs) were measured before and after cyclic loading (106 cycles, 3 Hz with 150 N), and the tensile removal force to dislodge the abutments was measured after cyclic loading. A repeated measures ANOVA and a pattern analysis based on the logarithmic regression model were conducted to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading on the axial displacement. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney test was conducted for comparison of RTV reduction% and tensile removal forces. RESULTS. There was no significant difference between CAD/CAM abutments and prefabricated abutments in axial displacement and tensile removal force; however, significantly greater RTV reduction% after cyclic loading was observed in CAD/CAM abutments. The correlation among the axial displacement, the RTV, and the tensile removal force was not significant. CONCLUSION. The use of CAD/CAM abutment did not significantly affect the amount of axial displacement and tensile removal force, but presented a significantly greater removal torque reduction% than prefabricated abutments. The connection stability due to the friction at the abutment-implant interface of CAD/CAM abutments may not be different from prefabricated abutment.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal connection type implants after cyclic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study was conducted with internal type implants of two different manufacturers (Group Os, De). Fourteen assemblies were prepared for each manufacturer group and divided into 2 groups (n=7): prefabricated abutments (Os-P, De-P) and CAD/CAM abutments (Os-C, De-C). The amount of axial displacement and the removal torque values (RTVs) were measured before and after cyclic loading (106 cycles, 3 Hz with 150 N), and the tensile removal force to dislodge the abutments was measured after cyclic loading. A repeated measures ANOVA and a pattern analysis based on the logarithmic regression model were conducted to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading on the axial displacement. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney test was conducted for comparison of RTV reduction% and tensile removal forces. RESULTS. There was no significant difference between CAD/CAM abutments and prefabricated abutments in axial displacement and tensile removal force; however, significantly greater RTV reduction% after cyclic loading was observed in CAD/CAM abutments. The correlation among the axial displacement, the RTV, and the tensile removal force was not significant. CONCLUSION. The use of CAD/CAM abutment did not significantly affect the amount of axial displacement and tensile removal force, but presented a significantly greater removal torque reduction% than prefabricated abutments. The connection stability due to the friction at the abutment-implant interface of CAD/CAM abutments may not be different from prefabricated abutment.
참고문헌 (31)
- Merz BR, "Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection : an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.519~526 (2000)
- Rack T, "An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotronbased radiography", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.44~50 (2013)
- Gehrke SA, "Changes in the abutment-implant interface in Morse taper implant connections after mechanical cycling : a pilot study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.791~797 (2014)
- Bozkaya D, "Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants", J Biomech, 36, pp.1649~1658 (2003)
- Seol HW, "Axial displacement of external and internal implant-abutment connection evaluated by linear mixed model analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, pp.1387~1399 (2015)
- Norton MR, "An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.290~298 (1997)
- Hansson S, "Implant-abutment interface : biomechanical study of flat top versus conical", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2, pp.33~41 (2000)
- Siamos G, "Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses", J Oral Implantol, 28, pp.67~73 (2002)
- Gil FJ, "Implantabutment connections : influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 25, pp.1825~1830 (2014)
- Sumi T, "Characteristics of implant-CAD", CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems, 2012, pp.39, 391~398
- Lee JH, "Comparison of customized abutments made from titanium and a machinable precious alloy", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 31, pp.92~100 (2016)
- Park JM, "An in vitro evaluation of the loosening of different interchangeable abutments in internal-connection-type implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp.350~355 (2017)
- Widmalm SE, "Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load", J Oral Rehabil, 9, pp.445~450 (1982)
- Richter EJ, "In vivo vertical forces on implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.99~108 (1995)
- Rosentritt M, "Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of allceramic fixed-partial dentures", Dent Mater, 22, pp.176~182 (2006)
- Delben JA, "Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.251~256 (2011)
- Cerutti-Kopplin D, "Influence of reverse torque values in abutments with or without internal hexagon indexes", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.824~827 (2014)
- de Oliveira Silva TS, "Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.621~627 (2017)
- Winkler S, "Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect : overview", J Oral Implantol, 29, pp.242~245 (2003)
- Jorge JR, "The role of implant", abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling, 2013, pp.28, 415~422
- Delben JA, "Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.251~256 (2011)
- Assunção WG, "Effect of unilateral misfit on preload of retention screws of implant-supported prostheses submitted to mechanical cycling", J Prosthodont Res, 55, pp.12~18 (2011)
- 조재영, "Influence of abutment materials on the implant-abutment joint stability in internal conical connection type implant systems", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(6), pp.491~497 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Breeding LC, "Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.435~439 (1993)
- Dixon DL, "Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.270~278 (1995)
- Theoharidou A, "Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.681~690 (2008)
- Burguete RL, "Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.592~599 (1994)
- Coelho AL, "Cross-sectional analysis of the implant-abutment interface", J Oral Rehabil, 34, pp.508~516 (2007)
- Bernardes SR, "Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening", untightening sequences, 2014, pp.29, 89~96
- Geng JP, "Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry : a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.585~598 (2001)
- Ricciardi Coppedê A, "Effect of repeated torque", mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections : an in vitro study, 2009, pp.20, 624~632