본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관람자(Audience)에 대한 대안적 접근 : 수잔 레이시 작품속에서

Suzanne Lacy : The Alternative Access of the Audience

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류미술

초록

Suzanne Lacy is an internationally known artist whose work includes installations, video, and large-scale performances on social themes and urban issues. Since 1970, her work has addressed a broad range of social and political themes, including violence against women, racism, incarceration, homelessness, poverty, medical care, education, and world peace. Her artworks take the form of installations, social process, writing, photography, and performance, and are often expansive collaborations with large numbers of individuals. Most of her major works are documented by video or television and include media literacy and analysis. In a series of large urban installations on violence against women, she broadened the collaborative process to include police, politicians, hotline activists and reporters, creating together multi-sited works that address social issues. There are connective threads between Lacy’s works and activist art of Lucy R. Lippard. Activist art, called ‘the movement for cultural democracy’, is process-oriented. These considerations have led to a radically different approach to artmaking. Tactics, or strategies of communication and distribution, enter into the creative process, as do activities usually considered separate from it, such as community work, meetings, graphic design, postering. The most impressive contributions to current activist art are those that provide not only new images and new forms of communication, but also delve down and move out into social life itself, through long-term activities such as Lacy’s artworks. Activist art takes years to develop formally effective ways to exchange powers with one’s chosen audience. It must emphasize clarity of meaning and communication. This pattern is completed by the actions of both participants and the audience. They plan and implement the project, including community organizing, leadership training, and public art workshops. Lacy’s contention of artists’ roles is to shape the public agenda for the issues of community. The artist as experiencer, reporter, analyst, and activist engages with a broader audience in Lacy’s concept of ‘New genre public art’. The artist becomes a conduit for the experience of others, gathers information to make it available to others, and undertakes the consensual production of meaning with the public. The potential audiences are real people in real places in her works. Consequently, the concept of audience is more important to Lacy’s works. The content of the artwork defines its audience grouping. The artwork is a metaphor for relationship with others. In new genre public art, art pieces are filled with the relationship between artist and audience. In fact the real work includes the yearlong organizing and workshops that lead up to it, as well as performance, media events, film and documentation that may follow. It includes education, communication, integration, and feedback for the selected audience. People in her art pieces have the ‘staying power’ that is the most important experience for participants and audience. The community is a kind of ‘memorial community’ throughout history and tradition, not simply the gathering of individuals. They take the responsibility for others in that culture as well as their freedom and rights. Thus, they preserve the relationship of inter-dependence and communal decision-making within their community. This ‘New Community’ in Lacy’s works is the network of superpositional and integral relationship. The artist and audience have changeable spectrum in each circumstance and context, not the fixed position. Lacy’s works find a lasting way to ‘develop a community through art’ under the media and ongoing education programs. This is the aim of new genre public art. Reviewing Lacy’s works, which include collaborations with other artists and more broadly conceived “collaborations” with people in various communities and occupations, is divided two parts; others of woman(The fluid identity) and the member in process of artmaking(engagement of community). This study will offer an opportunity to re-consider alternative method of access for audience.

Abstract

Suzanne Lacy is an internationally known artist whose work includes installations, video, and large-scale performances on social themes and urban issues. Since 1970, her work has addressed a broad range of social and political themes, including violence against women, racism, incarceration, homelessness, poverty, medical care, education, and world peace. Her artworks take the form of installations, social process, writing, photography, and performance, and are often expansive collaborations with large numbers of individuals. Most of her major works are documented by video or television and include media literacy and analysis. In a series of large urban installations on violence against women, she broadened the collaborative process to include police, politicians, hotline activists and reporters, creating together multi-sited works that address social issues. There are connective threads between Lacy’s works and activist art of Lucy R. Lippard. Activist art, called ‘the movement for cultural democracy’, is process-oriented. These considerations have led to a radically different approach to artmaking. Tactics, or strategies of communication and distribution, enter into the creative process, as do activities usually considered separate from it, such as community work, meetings, graphic design, postering. The most impressive contributions to current activist art are those that provide not only new images and new forms of communication, but also delve down and move out into social life itself, through long-term activities such as Lacy’s artworks. Activist art takes years to develop formally effective ways to exchange powers with one’s chosen audience. It must emphasize clarity of meaning and communication. This pattern is completed by the actions of both participants and the audience. They plan and implement the project, including community organizing, leadership training, and public art workshops. Lacy’s contention of artists’ roles is to shape the public agenda for the issues of community. The artist as experiencer, reporter, analyst, and activist engages with a broader audience in Lacy’s concept of ‘New genre public art’. The artist becomes a conduit for the experience of others, gathers information to make it available to others, and undertakes the consensual production of meaning with the public. The potential audiences are real people in real places in her works. Consequently, the concept of audience is more important to Lacy’s works. The content of the artwork defines its audience grouping. The artwork is a metaphor for relationship with others. In new genre public art, art pieces are filled with the relationship between artist and audience. In fact the real work includes the yearlong organizing and workshops that lead up to it, as well as performance, media events, film and documentation that may follow. It includes education, communication, integration, and feedback for the selected audience. People in her art pieces have the ‘staying power’ that is the most important experience for participants and audience. The community is a kind of ‘memorial community’ throughout history and tradition, not simply the gathering of individuals. They take the responsibility for others in that culture as well as their freedom and rights. Thus, they preserve the relationship of inter-dependence and communal decision-making within their community. This ‘New Community’ in Lacy’s works is the network of superpositional and integral relationship. The artist and audience have changeable spectrum in each circumstance and context, not the fixed position. Lacy’s works find a lasting way to ‘develop a community through art’ under the media and ongoing education programs. This is the aim of new genre public art. Reviewing Lacy’s works, which include collaborations with other artists and more broadly conceived “collaborations” with people in various communities and occupations, is divided two parts; others of woman(The fluid identity) and the member in process of artmaking(engagement of community). This study will offer an opportunity to re-consider alternative method of access for audience.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 강태희, "현대미술 문맥읽기" (1995), 미진사
  2. 송재룡, "포스트모던 시대와 공동체주의" (2001), 철학과 현실사
  3. 심상용, "현대미술의 욕망과 상실" (1999), 현대미학사
  4. 이창순, "페미니즘과 포스트모더니즘의 만남" (1997), 한울
  5. Bennett, Tony, "The Exhibitionary Complex ; Thingking about Exhibitions" (2002), 눈빛
  6. Burnham, Linda Frye, "Moments in the Heart: Performance and VideoExperiences in Community Art since 1980 ; Art the Public Interest" (1989), UMI Research Press
  7. Goldberg, RoseLee, "Performance art" (1989), 동문선
  8. Lippard, Lucy R., "Trojan Horses: Activist Art and Power ; Art after Modernism" (1987), 중앙일보사 계간미술편집부
  9. Gouma-Peterson, Thalia, "The feminist critique of art history" (1994), 시각과 언어
  10. Maclntyre, Alasdair, "덕의 상실" (1997), 문예출판사
  11. Miles, Malcolm, "Art, Space and the City" (2000), 학고재
  12. Nochlin, Linda, "The Body in pieces : the fragment as a metaphor of modernity" (2001), 조형교육
  13. Rifkin, Jeremy, "The Age of Access" (2001), 민음사
  14. Barbara Hoffman, "Law for Art’s in the Public Realm ; Art and the Public Sphere" (1992), The Univ. Chicago
  15. Chadwick, Whitney, "Women, Art, and Society" (1990), Thames & Hudson
  16. Gablik, Suzi, "The Reenchantment of Art" (1991), Thames & Hudson
  17. Lacy, Suzanne, "Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art" (1995), Bay Press
  18. Lippard, Lucy R., "Mixed blessings : new art in a multicultural America" (1990), Pantheon
  19. Lippard, Lucy R, "The Pink Glass Swan : selected essays on feminist art" (1995), New Press
  20. Michael North, "The Public as Sculpture: From Heavenly City to Mass Ornament ; Critical Inquiry(Summer 1990)" (1990), 242-249 재인용.
  21. Michell, W.J.T, "Art and the Public Sphere" (1996), The Univ. Chicago Press
  22. Miwon Kwon, "One Place after Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity" (2004), The MIT Press
  23. N. Broude, "The power of the Feminist Art; the American movement of the 1970s, history and impact" (1994), Harry N. Abrams
  24. Perry, Gill, "Gender and Art" (1999), Yale Press
  25. Senie, H. F, "Critical Issues in Public Art: Content, Context, and Controversy" (1992)
  26. 김홍의, "젠더: 제 3의성을 향하여, 모더니즘 이후: 이론과 비평의 문제", 한국미술평론가협회 ; 정기 학술세미나 (1998)
  27. 심광현, "‘문화사회’를 향한 새로운 문화운동의 과제", 계간 문화과학, (17) (1999)
  28. 이영숙, "생명의 젠더화와 생명여성주의 in: 지구화 시대의 젠더와 생명, 환경" (2002), 이화여자대학교 한국여성연구원
  29. Denes, Agnes, "The Dream", Critical Inquiry, 16(4) (1990)
  30. Fisher, Jennifer, "Interperformance: the live tableau of Suzanne Lacy, Janine Antoni and Marina Abramovic.(live performance artists)", Art Journal (1997)
  31. Giroux, Henry A., "Art, Education, and Memory", Sculpture, 16(3) (1997)
  32. Glowen, R, "Suzanne Lacy’s Under Construction performance at The Residences on Georgia", Art week (1997)
  33. Glueck,Grace, "Women Artists’80", Art News (1980)
  34. Moira Roth, "MAKING & PERFORMING CODE 33 A Public Art Project with Suzanne Lacy, Julio Morales, and Unique Holland", Performing arts journal (2001)
  35. Roth,Moira, "MAKING & PERFORMING CODE 33 A Public Art Project with Suzanne Lacy, Julio Morales, and Unique Holland", Performing arts journal (2001)
  36. 김희승, "크리스토의 프로젝트에 나타난 공공미술의 특성", 미술사학과, pp.1998
  37. 박소현, "바우하우스의 기계인간:모더니즘적 신체의 이중성", 미술사학과, pp.2000
  38. [URL]
  39. [URL]
  40. [URL]
  41. [URL]
  42. "Interview with Suzanne Lacy Conducted by Moira Roth in Berkeley, California, Archive of American Art, Smithsonian Institution", ~ (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)