민족혁명과 시민혁명: 타이와 미얀마
National Revolution vs. Civil Revolution: The Comparison between Thailand and Myanmar
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article regards the phase of political confrontations in Thailand and Burma as a prolonged and inconclusive political struggle between national revolution forces and civil revolution forces. It argues that in Thai case, anti-monarchy constitutional revolution has led to a right-wing national revolution based on state nationalism consolidating capitalist economic system by Sarit’s military coup, while in Burmese case, anti-British imperialism movement in colonial era has resulted in a left-wing national revolution grounded on state nationalism associating with socialist economic system by Ne Win’s military coup. It is also interesting to note that the two cases experienced state nationalism denying autonomous civil society as a process of nation-building in spite of their contrasting ideologies. In both cases, it became inevitable to have national revolution forces clinging to official nationalism and state nationalism confronting with civil revolution forces seeking popular nationalism and liberal nationalism. In particular, unlike Burmese society, Thai society, without colonial history has never experienced a civil war mobilizing anti-colonial popular nationalism including ethnic revolt. This article considers Dankwart Rustow’s argument that national unity as a background condition must precede all the other phases of democratization, but that otherwise its timing is irrelevant. In this context, Thai democratization without national unity which began earlier than Burmese is taking a backward step. For the time being, there would be no solution map to overcome severe political polarization between the right-wing national revolution forces defending official nationalism cum state nationalism and the civil revolution forces trying to go beyond official nationalism towards popular nationalism cum liberal nationalism. In contrast, paradoxically belated Burmese democratization has just taken a big leap in escaping from serious and inconclusive nature of political struggle between the left-wing national revolution forces to defend official nationalism cum state nationalism and civil revolution based on popular nationalism cum liberal nationalism towards a reconciliation phase in order to seek solutions for internal conflicts. The two case studies imply that national unity is not a background condition, but a consequence of the process of political polarization and reconciliation between national revolution forces and civil revolution forces.
Abstract
This article regards the phase of political confrontations in Thailand and Burma as a prolonged and inconclusive political struggle between national revolution forces and civil revolution forces. It argues that in Thai case, anti-monarchy constitutional revolution has led to a right-wing national revolution based on state nationalism consolidating capitalist economic system by Sarit’s military coup, while in Burmese case, anti-British imperialism movement in colonial era has resulted in a left-wing national revolution grounded on state nationalism associating with socialist economic system by Ne Win’s military coup. It is also interesting to note that the two cases experienced state nationalism denying autonomous civil society as a process of nation-building in spite of their contrasting ideologies. In both cases, it became inevitable to have national revolution forces clinging to official nationalism and state nationalism confronting with civil revolution forces seeking popular nationalism and liberal nationalism. In particular, unlike Burmese society, Thai society, without colonial history has never experienced a civil war mobilizing anti-colonial popular nationalism including ethnic revolt. This article considers Dankwart Rustow’s argument that national unity as a background condition must precede all the other phases of democratization, but that otherwise its timing is irrelevant. In this context, Thai democratization without national unity which began earlier than Burmese is taking a backward step. For the time being, there would be no solution map to overcome severe political polarization between the right-wing national revolution forces defending official nationalism cum state nationalism and the civil revolution forces trying to go beyond official nationalism towards popular nationalism cum liberal nationalism. In contrast, paradoxically belated Burmese democratization has just taken a big leap in escaping from serious and inconclusive nature of political struggle between the left-wing national revolution forces to defend official nationalism cum state nationalism and civil revolution based on popular nationalism cum liberal nationalism towards a reconciliation phase in order to seek solutions for internal conflicts. The two case studies imply that national unity is not a background condition, but a consequence of the process of political polarization and reconciliation between national revolution forces and civil revolution forces.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강철구, "역사와 이데올로기" (2004), 용과숲
- "프랑스 혁명과 근대민족주의의 시작" (2009), 강철구[URL]
- 고원, "민주주의 강의1-역사편" (2007), 민주화운동기념사업회
- 김홍구, "푸미폰 국왕의 정치개입 요인 분석", 동남아연구, 19(2), pp.53~108 (2009), 동남아연구소
- 끼다하라 아쯔시, "동남아시아 현대사 입문" (1983), 나남
- 겔너, 어네스트, "민족과 민주주의" (2009), 한반도국제대학원대학교
- 정병호, "극장국가 북한 - 카리스마 권력은 어떻게 세습되는가" (2013), 창비
- 네어, 클라크, "현대 동남아의 이해" (1993), 서울 프레스
- 무어, 베링톤, "독재와 민주주의의 사회적 기원" (1990), 까치
- 밀턴 오스본, "한 권에 담은 동남아시아 역사" (2000), 오름
- 박은홍, "태국의 민주주의와 인권", 민주주의와 인권, 1(2) (2001)
- 박은홍, "포스트-탁신 시대의 '붉은셔츠': 이념, 조직, 행동", 동남아시아연구, 23(1), pp.89~126 (2013), 한국동남아학회
- 박은홍, "버마의 봄, 변화의 거대한 행보는 계속 될 것인가", 황해문화, (78) (2013)
- 미얀마: 모두가 알아야 할 사실들, "버마", pp.2011, 슈타인버그, 데이비드
- 쉬블리, 필립스, "정치학개론: 권력과 선택" (2014), 명인문화사
- 아시아․아프리카․라틴아메리카연구회, "버마 현대사: 버마식 사회주의와 버마 민중항쟁" (1989), 소나무
- 아웅 모 조, "동아시아와 한국" (2007), 민주화운동기념사업회
- 양길현, "동남아의 정치 리더십" (1996), 21세기한국연구재단
- 염운옥, "제국주의 시기 식민지인의 ‘정치참여’ 비교" (2007), 선인
- 앤더슨, 베네딕트, "민족주의의 기원과 전파" (1991), 나남
- 장준영, "미얀마의 정치경제와 개혁개방" (2012), 지식과교양
- 조흥국, "태국-불교와 국왕의 나라" (2007), 소나무
- 차상호, "태국 현대민주정치론" (2003), 한국외국어대출판부
- 크리스티, 클라이브, "20세기 동남아시아의 역사" (2005), 심산
- 프리먼, 마이클, "인권: 이론과 실천" (2004), 아르케
- 하이듀즈, 매리, "동남아의 역사와 문화" (2012), 솔과학
- 홉스봄, 에릭, "1780년 이후 민족과 민족주의" (1998), 창작과비평사
- Baker, Chris, "A History of Thailand" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Callahan, Mary P., "Burma:Prospects for a Democratic Era" (1998), Brookings Institution Press
- Compton, Robert W., "East Asian Democratization: Impact of Globlalization, Culture, and Economy" (2000), Praeger
- Esterline, John H., "동남아정치입문" (1991), 박영사
- Jagan, Larry, "Myanmar’s Long Road to National Reconciliation" (2006), ISEAS
- Heywood, Andrew, "Politics" (1997), Macmillan
- Piyapat Bunnag, "The Proactive Cosmopolitan Foreign Policy of the European Union", Asian Review, 17 (2004)
- Riggs, Fred, "Thailand" (1966), East-West Center Press
- Rustow, Dankwart A., "Transtions to Democracy", Comparative Politics, 2(3) (1970)
- Sai Khaing Myo Tun, "Limits of Good Governance in Developing Countries" (2011), Gadjah Mada Univ. Press
- Sakhong, Lian H., "The New Panglong Initiative:Rebuilding the Union of Burma" (2002), UNLD Press
- Silverstein, Josef, "Burma", Brookings Institution Press
- Smith, Martin, "Myanmar’s Long Load to National Reconciliation" (2006), ISEAS
- Somchai Phatharathannunth, "The Politics of Postpeasant Society:The Emergence of the Rural Red Shirts in Northeast Thailand" (2011)
- Taylor, Robert H., "Burma" (1998), Brookings Institution Press
- Taylor, Robert H., "Burma: Political Economy under Military Rule" (2001), Hurst&Company
- Tin Maung Maung Than, "State Dominance in Myanmar" (2007), ISEAS
- Wyatt, David K., "Thailand: A Short History" (1982), Edwards Brothers, Inc