본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

태국의 군부쿠데타와 민주주의로의 여정: 2006년 군부쿠데타 이후를 중심으로

Military Coup and Journey for Democracy in Thailand: Since the 2006 Military Coup

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This study is to examine political change of Thailand in the process of democratic transition and consolidation after democratization, and to investigate the problems and political implications before and after the 2006 military coup. Actually, all countries experienced the process of democratic transition and consolidation after democratization dose not automatically maintain and institutionalize the democratic regime. Thailand seems to be successful to consolidate democracy when the prime minister Thaksin and Thai Rak Thai party government continuously took the political power in the 2001 and 2005 election through the 1997 constitution, which was established by national agreement and consensus. However, the 1997 constitution was interrupted by the 2006 military coup, and democracy was reversed to political crisis. This situation was result that the principle of ‘check and balance’ between each political party did not worked in the process of democratic transition and consolidation. The tug of war between anti-Thaksin force and Thaksin support force brought about political unstability and social disorder, and Thailand faced political crisis, which was called reverse of democracy. In conclusion, for stable consolidation of democratic regime after democratization, it needs substantive democracy that each political actor makes up national agreement and consensus and balances power by check and balance beyond institutional and procedural democracy.

Abstract

This study is to examine political change of Thailand in the process of democratic transition and consolidation after democratization, and to investigate the problems and political implications before and after the 2006 military coup. Actually, all countries experienced the process of democratic transition and consolidation after democratization dose not automatically maintain and institutionalize the democratic regime. Thailand seems to be successful to consolidate democracy when the prime minister Thaksin and Thai Rak Thai party government continuously took the political power in the 2001 and 2005 election through the 1997 constitution, which was established by national agreement and consensus. However, the 1997 constitution was interrupted by the 2006 military coup, and democracy was reversed to political crisis. This situation was result that the principle of ‘check and balance’ between each political party did not worked in the process of democratic transition and consolidation. The tug of war between anti-Thaksin force and Thaksin support force brought about political unstability and social disorder, and Thailand faced political crisis, which was called reverse of democracy. In conclusion, for stable consolidation of democratic regime after democratization, it needs substantive democracy that each political actor makes up national agreement and consensus and balances power by check and balance beyond institutional and procedural democracy.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김홍구, "태국 쿠데타와 정국 전망", 동아시아 브리프, 1(4) (2006)
  2. 서경교, "태국의 정치변동과 민주주의: 주요 정치행위자를 중심으로", 한국태국학회논총, 18(2), pp.1~35 (2012), 한국태국학회
  3. 서경교, "민주화 과정에서 대중들의 정치적 인식: 태국사례", 한국태국학회논총, 19(2), pp.145~178 (2013), 한국태국학회
  4. 윤진표, "태국의 쿠데타 발생과 정치 전망: 제도와 리더십의부조화", 미래전략연구원 특별기고 (9월 25일), ~ (2006)
  5. 윤진표, "태국 민주주의의 혼란: 국가와 시민사회의 부조화", 한국태국학회논총, 19(1), pp.37~75 (2012), 한국태국학회
  6. 이동윤, "민주주의 공고화와 퇴보 사이에서:태국의 탁씬 정부와 민주주의 논쟁", 국제정치논총, 47(2), pp.173~196 (2007), 한국국제정치학회
  7. 이동윤, "탁씬의 귀국과 태국의 정국 변화", 동아시아 브리프, 3(2) (2008)
  8. 이동윤, "태국의 정치개혁 확산과 내재화의 실패: 1997년 헌법 개정을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 50(1), pp.397~420 (2010), 한국국제정치학회
  9. Albritton, Robert B., "Thailand in 2005: The Struggle for Democratic Consolidation", Asian Survey, 46(1) (2006)
  10. Armony, Ariel C., "Babel in Democratization Studies", Journal of Democracy, 16(4) (2005)
  11. Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL), "Chaotic Thailand and Violations of International Electoral Standards", ANFREL Statement (April 5), ~ (2006)
  12. "Bangkok Post (BP) 2005.02.25", ~ (2005)
  13. Baker, Bruce, "Democracy and Political Change in the ‘Third World.’" (2001), Routledge
  14. Blais, André and, "Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Southern Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia" (1990), The Macmillan Press
  15. Chai-anan Samudananija, "The Thai Young Turks" (1982), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  16. Chairat Charoensin-o-larn, "Divided over Thaksin:Thailand's Coup and Problematic Transition" (2009), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Chiang Mai:Silkworm
  17. Chairat Charoensin-o-larn, "Southeast Asian Affairs 2010" (2010), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  18. Southeast Asian Affairs, "Bangkok May 2010:Perspectives on a Divided Thailand" (2012), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  19. Chambers, Paul, "Democracy under Stress: Civil-Military Relations in South and Southeast Asia" (2010), Institute of Security and International Studies
  20. Dahl, Robert A., "Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition" (1971), Yale University Press
  21. Diamond, Larry, "Developing Democracy toward Consolidation" (1999), The Johns Hopkins University Press
  22. Engberg, Jan, "Democracy and Political Change in the ‘Third World" (2001), Routledge
  23. Haynes, Jeff., "Democracy and Political Change in the ‘Third World.’" (2001), Routledge
  24. Hewison, Kevin, "Bangkok May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand" (2012), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  25. Kitti Prasirtsuk, "From Political Reform and Economic Crisis to Coup D'état: The Twists and Turns of the Political Economy, 1997-2006", Asian Survey, 47(6) (2007)
  26. Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, "The Paradox of Thailand's 1997‘People's Constitution’: Be Careful What you Wish For", Asian Survey, 48(3) (2008)
  27. 이동윤, "Political Crises after Democratization in South Korea and Thailand:Comparative Perspectives of Democratic Consolidation", Korea Observer, 39(1), pp.121~156 (2008), 한국학술연구원
  28. Linz, Juan J., "Toward Consolidated Democracy", Journal of Democracy, 7(2) (1996)
  29. Macedo, Stephen, "Pathways to Democracy: The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions" (2000), Routledge
  30. Montesano, Michael J., "Divided over Thaksin: Thailand's Coup and Problematic Transition" (2009), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Chiang Mai: Silkworm
  31. Montesano, Michael J., "Bangkok May 2010:Perspectives on a Divided Thailand" (2012), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  32. Ockey, James, "Making Democracy: Leadership, Class, Gender, and Political Participation in Thailand" (2004), University of Hawaii Press
  33. Paichart Siwaraksa, "Thai Constitution in Brief" (1997), Institute of Public Policy Studies
  34. Pasuk Phongpaichit, "Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand" (2004), Silkworm Books
  35. Pavin Chachavalpongpun, "Unity As a Discourse in Thailand's Polarized Politics.” Southeast Asian Affairs 2010" (2010), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  36. Sørensen, Georg, "Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World" (1993), Westview Press
  37. Schedler, Andreas, "What is Democratic Consolidation?", Journal of Democracy, 9(2) (1998)
  38. Schmitter, Philippe C., "The Global Resurgence of Democracy" (1993), The Johns Hopkins University Press
  39. Thitinan Pongsudhirak, "Divided over Thaksin: Thailand's Coup and Problematic Transition" (2009), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Chiang Mai: Silkworm

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)