관광특구 평가지표의 타당성에 관한 연구
A Study on the validity of Special Tourism Zone Evaluation Indicators
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has intended to elicit the appropriate evaluation indicators of Special Tourism Zone in Korea. The method used for this study was content analysis, and 27 evaluation indicators in the country were selected for analysis. Analyses were conducted focusing on the type(Urban, Waterside, Hot spring, Mountain,Culture, Complex type) and basic elements(Tourism Planner, Infra structure, Inter structure,Superstructure) of Special Tourism Zone. The major findings of this study were as follows. 1) There is no relation between STZ’s type and indicator. An example for the Waterside type, Boryeong and Haeundae tourism zone are evaluated by different indicators. Meanwhile, Mt. Sorak(Mountain type) and Haeundae(Waterside type) are evaluated by same indicator. 2) There are some notable omissions and uneven distribution according to basic elements. To make up the basic elements, a delphi survey was conducted twice among 28 professionals. The proposed basic indicator elements will contribute in examining STZ‘s basic factors. In addition, new evaluation indicators by the type should be developed.
Abstract
This study has intended to elicit the appropriate evaluation indicators of Special Tourism Zone in Korea. The method used for this study was content analysis, and 27 evaluation indicators in the country were selected for analysis. Analyses were conducted focusing on the type(Urban, Waterside, Hot spring, Mountain,Culture, Complex type) and basic elements(Tourism Planner, Infra structure, Inter structure,Superstructure) of Special Tourism Zone. The major findings of this study were as follows. 1) There is no relation between STZ’s type and indicator. An example for the Waterside type, Boryeong and Haeundae tourism zone are evaluated by different indicators. Meanwhile, Mt. Sorak(Mountain type) and Haeundae(Waterside type) are evaluated by same indicator. 2) There are some notable omissions and uneven distribution according to basic elements. To make up the basic elements, a delphi survey was conducted twice among 28 professionals. The proposed basic indicator elements will contribute in examining STZ‘s basic factors. In addition, new evaluation indicators by the type should be developed.
참고문헌 (22)
- 제4차 경기도권역 관광개발계획, "경기개발연구원", ~ (2007)
- 곽노엽, "관광자의 태도에 따른 관광지 속성의 선 호도", 한국조경학회지, 74, pp.29~40 (1998)
- 김상무, "관광사업론" (1991), 계명대학교출판부
- 박명옥, "문화동기와 비일상성 추구성향이 문화 관광지속성과 만족에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2000
- 박석희, "신 관광자원론" (2002), 명보사
- 서울특별시 관광특구 활성화 및 평가방안, "서울시정개발연구원", ~ (2007)
- 순치엔롱, "인터넷 사이트의 관광지 이미지표현:한국관광 관련 중국어 사이트의 관광정보에 대 한 내용분석", 석사, pp.2009
- 안현주, "한국 관광학연구의 시기별 성향분석: 학술지 게재논문의 내용분석을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
- 오익근, "내용분석의 관광연구 활용", 관광학연구, 24(1), pp.371~377 (2000)
- 이태원관광특구 활성화 계획연구, "용산구청", ~ (2005)
- 하재은, "관광지 개성과 속성이 관광지 선택에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구:한⋅중⋅일 관광객들 의 비교를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2005
- 관광특구제도개선 및 운영 활성화방안, "한국문화관광연구원", ~ (2002)
- 관광특구 평가 및 개선방 안, "한국문화관광연구원", ~ (2008)
- 2010 외래관광객실태조사, "한국문화관광연구원", ~ (2010)
- Coltman, M. M, "Introduction to Travel and Tourism: An International Approach" (1989), Van Nostrand Reinhold
- Fallon, "The dynamics of destination attribute importance", Journal of Business Research, 59(6), pp.709~713 (2006)
- Vacation scope: Designing Tourist Regions, "Gunn, A. Clare", University of Texas, ~ (1972)
- Holloway. J. Christopher, "The Business of Tourism" (1986), Macdonald and Evans
- Kozak, "Measuring tourist destination competitiveness: conceptual considerations and empirical findings", International journal of hospitality management, 18(3), pp.273~283 (1999)
- McIntosh, Robert W., "Tourism: Principles, Practices, Philosophies" (1995), John Wilkey & Sons, Inc
- Mill, "The Tourism System, 4th Edition", pp.2002, Kendall
- Salah S. Hassan, "Determinants of Market Competitiveness in an Environmentally Sustainable Tourism Industry", Journal of Travel Research, 38, pp.239~245 (2000)