주주의 대표소송에 관한 소고 -당사자를 중심으로-
A study on the derivative suit by shareholders
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A derivative suit is an action by the shareholder on behalf of the company to pursue a cause of action that is vested in (or belongs to) the company where there is an abuse of power by the directors . Any shareholder who holds more than 1/100 of the total issued and outstanding shares may demand that the company file an action against directors to enforce their liability. Any shareholder who has been holding 1/10,000 or more of the total number of outstanding stocks issued by any stock-listed corporation or any Kosdaq-listed corporation for 6 months under the conditions as prescribed by the presidential Decree may exercise his right as a stockholder. This demand shall be made in writing, stating the reason and the name of directors etc. thereof. But if irreparable damage may be caused to the company with the lapse of the period, the shareholder may immediately file such action. If the company has failed to file such an action within 30days from the date on which the demand was received, the shareholder may immediately file such an action. Shareholding at the time of the alleged wrong is required of a shareholder bringing a derivative action. And Standing to sue must exist not only when the action is commenced but during its entire maintenance through entry of the final judgement. Only the shareholder, to enter his or her name in the register of shareholders, shall file a suit, because the transfer of a registered share shall not be asserted against the company, unless the name and address of the transferee have been entered in the register of shareholders. The double suit, the shareholder of the parents company file a suit against the directors of the subsidiary company on behalf of the subsidiary company, is not permitted, because every corporation is one’s own incorporation. Shareholders of stock-listed or Kosdaq-listed company, whose condition of Article 403 of the commercial code was fulfilled, shall file a suit.
Abstract
A derivative suit is an action by the shareholder on behalf of the company to pursue a cause of action that is vested in (or belongs to) the company where there is an abuse of power by the directors . Any shareholder who holds more than 1/100 of the total issued and outstanding shares may demand that the company file an action against directors to enforce their liability. Any shareholder who has been holding 1/10,000 or more of the total number of outstanding stocks issued by any stock-listed corporation or any Kosdaq-listed corporation for 6 months under the conditions as prescribed by the presidential Decree may exercise his right as a stockholder. This demand shall be made in writing, stating the reason and the name of directors etc. thereof. But if irreparable damage may be caused to the company with the lapse of the period, the shareholder may immediately file such action. If the company has failed to file such an action within 30days from the date on which the demand was received, the shareholder may immediately file such an action. Shareholding at the time of the alleged wrong is required of a shareholder bringing a derivative action. And Standing to sue must exist not only when the action is commenced but during its entire maintenance through entry of the final judgement. Only the shareholder, to enter his or her name in the register of shareholders, shall file a suit, because the transfer of a registered share shall not be asserted against the company, unless the name and address of the transferee have been entered in the register of shareholders. The double suit, the shareholder of the parents company file a suit against the directors of the subsidiary company on behalf of the subsidiary company, is not permitted, because every corporation is one’s own incorporation. Shareholders of stock-listed or Kosdaq-listed company, whose condition of Article 403 of the commercial code was fulfilled, shall file a suit.
참고문헌 (40)
- 권기범, "현대회사법론" (2001), 삼지원
- 김정수, "증권거래법" (2002), 박영사
- 박원선, "새상법(상)" (1962), 수학사
- 서돈각, "신상법" (1963), 법문사
- 서돈각, "상법강의(상권)" (1999), 법문사
- 손주찬, "상법(상)" (1999), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권각론" (2000), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2006), 박영사
- 임재연, "증권거래법" (2002), 박영사
- 임홍근, "회사법" (2000), 법문사
- 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2003), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2008), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법강의(상)" (1999), 박영사
- 최기원, "신회사법론" (2004), 박영사
- 김건식, "주주대표소송의 활성화와 관련된 몇 가지 문제점-일본의 경험을 참고로 하여-", 법학, 37(2) (1996), 서울대학교
- 김동훈, "다중대표소송에 대한 고찰” 「21세기한국상사법의 진로」(우내우홍구박사정년기념논문집)", ~ (2002)
- 김재형, "이중대표소송의 인정근거", 상사판례연구, 15 (2003), 한국상사판례학회
- 권재열, "二重代表訴訟의 許否에 대한 比較法的 檢討- 서울고등법원 2003.8.22. 선고, 2002다13746 판결을 대상으로 하여 -", 비교사법, 11(2), pp.443~475 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- 김대연, "주주대표소송에서의 원고적격", 비교사법, 5(1)통권 : 8호
- 강희갑, "회사지배구조에 있어서의 주주의 대표소송-미국법을 중심으로", 비교사법, 4(2) (1997), 한국비교사법학회
- 강희주, "대표소송에 관한 일고", 인권과 정의, (280) (1999)
- 남장우, "주주대표소송에 의한 경영자책임추궁에 관한 연구", 법조, (506) (1998)
- 민형기, "주주의 대표소송”, 회사법의 제문제(하), 재판자료(제38집), 법원행정처", ~ (1987)
- 안성포, "주주의 대표소송과 원고적격성", 비교사법, 12(1) (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- 이병태, "주식회사 이사의 지위와 회사에 대한 책임", 박사, pp.1985
- 이태종, "주주의 대표소송에 관한 연구-사문화와 남소의 방지를 위한 절차를 중심으로-", 박사, pp.1997
- 정동윤, "주주의 대표소송-실무상의 문제점을 중심으로 하여-", 사법논집, 2 (1971), 법원행정처
- 정병석, "이중대표소송의 허용가능성-대법원 2004. 9. 23. 선고 2003다49221판결-", 기업법연구, 19(1), pp.343~369 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 江頭憲治郞, "會社法" (2001), 有斐閣
- 近藤光男, "會社經營者の過失" (1989), 弘文堂
- 北川 ?, "株主代表訴訟ㆍ理事の責任制度の現狀と問題點", 商事法務, (1396) (1995)
- 北澤義博, "株主代表訴訟 企業統治" (2002), 淸文社
- 松尾, "株主代表訴訟と役員賠償責任保險" (1994), 中央經濟社
- Robert C. Clark, "Corporate Law" (1986), Little Brown & Co.
- Melvin Aron Eisenberg, "An Overview of the Principles of Corporate Governance", 48 Bus. Law, 1271 (1993)
- Franklin A. Gevurtz, "「Corporation Law」, Hornbook series, St. Paul, Minn", ~ (2000)
- Robert W. Hamilton, "The Law of Corporations" (1996), West Publishing Co
- Harry G. Henn, "Laws of Corporation" (1983), West Publishing Co
- Edward P. Welch, "Folk on the Delaware General Corporation Law : Fundamentals" (1996), Fundamentals,Little Brown & Co.
- Smith and Keenan, "Company Law, Pearson, 13th ed", ~
