二重代表訴訟制度에 관한 法的 考察
A Legal Study on the Double Derivative Suit
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The double derivative suit has been developed in case law in the U.S.A. in the pursuit of justice. In the U.S.A., this kind of suit is inferred from a single derivative suit and extends its qualification for a plaintiff to a shareholder of its parent corporation. The 2006 revision draft of the Korean Commercial Code(K.C.C.) introduces a double derivative suit which is recognized in common law jurisdiction. The double derivative suit can protect minor shareholders of parent corporation from harmful management of fiduciaries of subsidiary. However the most business circles and corporations in Korea are opposed to introducing this kind of derivative suit in the K.C.C. on the ground that will obviously shrink activities of corporations. But it is very important to recognize that the derivative proceeding of shareholders is an equitable remedy. This means that it is only a extraordinary and exceptional device to help the shareholders. In consequence, it is very difficult and so at the same time meaningless to codify the pre-requisites of this suit. I think the best way to introduce and to develop it is through a case law.
Abstract
The double derivative suit has been developed in case law in the U.S.A. in the pursuit of justice. In the U.S.A., this kind of suit is inferred from a single derivative suit and extends its qualification for a plaintiff to a shareholder of its parent corporation. The 2006 revision draft of the Korean Commercial Code(K.C.C.) introduces a double derivative suit which is recognized in common law jurisdiction. The double derivative suit can protect minor shareholders of parent corporation from harmful management of fiduciaries of subsidiary. However the most business circles and corporations in Korea are opposed to introducing this kind of derivative suit in the K.C.C. on the ground that will obviously shrink activities of corporations. But it is very important to recognize that the derivative proceeding of shareholders is an equitable remedy. This means that it is only a extraordinary and exceptional device to help the shareholders. In consequence, it is very difficult and so at the same time meaningless to codify the pre-requisites of this suit. I think the best way to introduce and to develop it is through a case law.
참고문헌 (21)
- 권재열, "二重代表訴訟의 許否에 대한 比較法的 檢討- 서울고등법원 2003.8.22. 선고, 2002다13746 판결을 대상으로 하여 -", 비교사법, 11(2), pp.443~475 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- 김대규, "지배회사주주의 이중대표소송", 증권법연구, 5(2) (2004), 한국증권법학회
- 김대연, "지배?종속회사에서의 대표소송", 상사법연구, 19(2) (2000)
- 김동석, "주주의 대표소송과 중복대표소송", 경영법률, 통권 : 10 (2000)
- 김동훈, "주주대표소송의 이용범위 확대", 외법논집, 통권 : 13 (2002)
- 김문재, "지주회사의 도입에 따른 회사법의 방향-지배와 책임을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 18(1) (1999)
- 박신호, "“이중대표소송제도 도입의 문제점”, 전국경제인연합회, CEO REPORT, CER 006-12", ~
- 송옥렬, "현행 상법상 이중대표소송의 허용여부", 민사판례연구, 통권 : 29 (2006)
- 안수현, "이중대표소송과 원고적격 in: 상사판례연구Ⅵ" (2006), 박영사
- 유진희, "이중대표소송의 도입에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 상사판례연구, 4통권 : 19 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 여하윤, "미국 회사법상의 이중대표소송에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 이동원, "지주회사" (2001), 세창출판사
- 이태종, "미국회사법상의 이중대표소송", 재판실무연구, 2 (1997)
- 최성근, "“지주회사의 해금과 상법관련법제에 관한 연구”, 연구보고 99-01, 한국법제연구원, 1999", ~ (1999)
- 최준선, "이중대표소송제도의 입법론에 대한 검토", 성균관법학, 18(3) (2006), 성균관대학교 법학연구소
- 최완진, "상법학강의" (2005), 법문사
- 공정거래위원회, "공정거래백서" (2003)
- "참여연대, 38개 재벌 총수일가의 주식거래에 대한 보고서-회사기회의 편취금지 및 이중대표소송제도 입법운동을 시작하며-, 2006.4.6", ~ (2006)
- 田邊光政, "新版 會社法要說" (2006), 財務經理協會
- Harry G. Henn, "Laws of Corporations" (1983), Westing Publishing Co.
- David W. Lacascio, ""The Dilemma of the Double Derivative Suit", 83 Nw. U.L. Rev.729(1989)", ~ (1989)