中國 會社法上 株主代表訴訟制度에 관한 考察
A Study on China’s New Company Law Shareholders’ Derivative Suit
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A shareholders’ derivative suit system is not only the measure of controlling company’s director, or board of director’s abuse of rights control device but also has a risk of strike suit under the circumstance of shareholders who are eligible for plaintiff, overuse a shareholders’ derivative suit institution for the purpose of their benefit. Accordingly, a shareholders’ derivative suit has both usefulness and the possibility of overuse. Thus, there should be a suitable balance and agreement between the rights of supervision on the company’s director, or board of director for the minority of shareholders who are eligible for plaintiff and healthy and clear rights of the execution of one’s duty for the company’s director, or board of director. China introduced a shareholders’ derivative suit as new provisions in Chinese new company law reformation in 2005. (§150~§153) The main purpose of this introduction is to regulate by the law, by means of, to correspond to globalized economy system, to improve corporative governance and to protect minority of shareholders from interest plan. However, there are small numbers of case using shareholders’ derivative suit up to now. Consequently, it is examined from various points to revitalize the shareholders’ derivative suit. Firstly, in the case of a stock company that is under the regulation of Chinese new company law, it is necessary to improve widely the rights of litigating shareholders’ derivative suit for shareholders who continuously owns a stock for more than 180 days individually or in total of more than 1%. Or, it can be improved as individual shareholder’s right like in America and Japan. Moreover, it is necessary to improve the condition of demanding account book and documents as it is difficult to collect information for the minority of shareholders who can institute shareholders’ derivative suit and they have to charge proof responsibility on the process of litigation. At present, overuse of shareholders’ derivative suit’s institution is not a serious problem to concern in China. However, if shareholders’ derivative suit system revitalizes, there will be a frequent institution on inappropriate litigation from shareholders for the purpose of their benefit and strike suit. To solve this problem, it is explained in detail above. In addition, to cultivate excellent talents for the company with the solution of preventing economic crisis should be studied.
Abstract
A shareholders’ derivative suit system is not only the measure of controlling company’s director, or board of director’s abuse of rights control device but also has a risk of strike suit under the circumstance of shareholders who are eligible for plaintiff, overuse a shareholders’ derivative suit institution for the purpose of their benefit. Accordingly, a shareholders’ derivative suit has both usefulness and the possibility of overuse. Thus, there should be a suitable balance and agreement between the rights of supervision on the company’s director, or board of director for the minority of shareholders who are eligible for plaintiff and healthy and clear rights of the execution of one’s duty for the company’s director, or board of director. China introduced a shareholders’ derivative suit as new provisions in Chinese new company law reformation in 2005. (§150~§153) The main purpose of this introduction is to regulate by the law, by means of, to correspond to globalized economy system, to improve corporative governance and to protect minority of shareholders from interest plan. However, there are small numbers of case using shareholders’ derivative suit up to now. Consequently, it is examined from various points to revitalize the shareholders’ derivative suit. Firstly, in the case of a stock company that is under the regulation of Chinese new company law, it is necessary to improve widely the rights of litigating shareholders’ derivative suit for shareholders who continuously owns a stock for more than 180 days individually or in total of more than 1%. Or, it can be improved as individual shareholder’s right like in America and Japan. Moreover, it is necessary to improve the condition of demanding account book and documents as it is difficult to collect information for the minority of shareholders who can institute shareholders’ derivative suit and they have to charge proof responsibility on the process of litigation. At present, overuse of shareholders’ derivative suit’s institution is not a serious problem to concern in China. However, if shareholders’ derivative suit system revitalizes, there will be a frequent institution on inappropriate litigation from shareholders for the purpose of their benefit and strike suit. To solve this problem, it is explained in detail above. In addition, to cultivate excellent talents for the company with the solution of preventing economic crisis should be studied.
참고문헌 (51)
- 李時潤, "新民事訴訟法(第3版)" (2006), 博英社
- 李哲松, "會社法講義(第13版)" (2006), 博英社
- 鄭東潤, "會社法(第7版)" (2001), 法文社
- 鄭燦亨, "商法講義(上)(第10版)" (2007), 博英社
- 崔基元, "商法學新論(上)(第16版)" (2006), 博英社
- 崔埈璿, "會社法(第3版)" (2007), 三英社
- 周劍龍, "株主代表訴訟制度論" (1996), 信山社
- 小林秀之, "株主代表訴訟大系" (1996), 弘文堂
- 山田泰弘, "株主代表訴訟の法理" (2000), 信山社
- 松田二郞, "會社法槪論" (1968), 岩波書店
- 北澤正啓, "會社法(第6版)" (2001), 靑林書院
- 中?政法大?出版社, "李哲松", 2000
- ?俊海, "新公司法的制度?新:立法?点?解??点" (2006), 法律出版社
- 施天?, "公司法?(第二版)" (2006), 法律出版社
- 施天?, "商法?（第三版)" (2006), 法律出版
- 沈四?(??), "最新美??准公司法" (2006), 法律出版社
- 王保?, "中?公司法原理" (2006), 社?科?文?出版社
- 王保? 于敏, "最新日本公司法" (2006), 法律出版社
- 奚?明, "最高人民法院?于公司法解?(一)（二）理解?适用" (2008), 人民法院出版社
- ?旭?, "新公司法??" (2006), 人民法院出版社
- ?旭?, "新公司法制度??" (2006), 法律出版社
- Romano,Roberta, "Foundations of Corporate Law" (1993), Oxford Univ.Press
- 姜熙甲, "商法上 株主의 代表訴訟,” 도암 김교창변호사 華甲記念論文集?企業과 法" (1997), 司法行政學會
- 고동수, "株主代表訴訟과 經營判斷의 原則,” 月刊KIET 産業經濟, 通卷43號, 産業經濟硏究院", ~ (2002)
- 權載烈, "經營判斷의 原則", 比較私法, 6(1) (1999)
- 金建植, "株主代表訴訟의 活性化와 關聯된 몇 가지 問題點?―日本의 經驗을 參考로 하여― 서울大 法學", 서울大學校 法學硏究所, 37(2) (1996)
- 金大淵, "株主代表訴訟에서의 原告適格", 比較私法, 5(1) (1998), 韓國比較私法學會
- 金大淵, "株主代表訴訟과 經營判斷의 原則", 商事法硏究, 17(3) (1999), 韓國商事法學會
- 김석연, "經營者 支配와 株主代表訴訟의 役割", 韓國法學院報, (80) (1998)
- 김영곤, "株主의 代表訴訟에 관한 小考", 企業法硏究, 11 (2002), 韓國企業法學會
- 梁東錫, "企業의 支配構造改善을 위한 株主의 代表訴訟", 商事法硏究, 19(2) (2000)
- 梁東錫, "代表訴訟의 活性化와 理事의 責任輕減", 比較私法, 9(4) (2002)
- 梁東錫, "經營判斷의 原則과 株主代表訴訟,” 朝鮮大學校 法學論集, 朝鮮大學校 統一問題硏究所", ~ (2001)
- 이봉의(BongEui Lee)ㆍ이의영(EuiYoung Lee)ㆍ김재구(JaeGu Kim)ㆍ양덕순(DeokSoon Yang), "企業支配構造改善을 위한 株主代表訴訟制度의 國際比較", 商事判例硏究, 19(1) (2006), 韓國商事判例學會
- 이정표(JeongPyo Lee, "中國 改正 會社法 硏究" (2006), 法制處
- 李泰鐘, "株主의 代表訴訟에 관한 硏究?―死文化와 濫訴의 防止를 위한 節次를 中心으로―", 박사, pp.1997
- 林在淵, "代表訴訟과 代位訴訟에 관한 比較 硏究", 法曹, 44(8) (1995), 法曹協會
- 林泓根, ""企業支配構造改善에 관한 公聽會 資料" (2000), "法務部
- 차종선, "株主代表訴訟制度의 改善方案에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.2001
- 江平, "完善公司治理??的基本法律??", ~ (2002)
- 史?春,"?于公司ㆍ企?的若干考整和辨析,"法?家, "?于公司ㆍ企?的若干考整和辨析, 法?家" (1996), 中?人民大?出版社
- 胡枚玲ㆍ??,"?新公司法股?代表??法律适用及完善,"?西政法管理干部?院?? 第22卷 第1期, "?新公司法股?代表??法律适用及完善", 西政法管理干部院, 22(1) (2007)
- 孔??, "我?股?代表??制度的完善" (2007), 成人高??刊
- 石桐?, "?我?新 ≪公司法≫ 中的股?派生??制度, ??公安司法管理干部?院??", ~ (2007)
- 糖?, "海??岸公司股?代表??制度比?,”" (2007), ?岸法苑
- 章?洪, "“股?派生???究,” 西南政法大?" (2006), 博士?位?文
- "日本通商産業省 産業政策局 産業資金課 編, “株主代表訴訟の現象と課題", ~ (1995)
- Cox, "Compensation, Deterrence and the Market as Boundaries for Derivative Suit Procedure, 52 Geo, Wash. L. Rev. 745", ~ (1984)
- R. Franklin Balotti, "The Delaware Law of Corporations and Business Organization: Text, Forms Law ?4.6", ~ (1997)
- Scot, "Corporation Law and the American Law Institute Corporation Governance Project, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 927, 940", ~ (1980)
- "The American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance; Analysis and Recommendation", ~ (1992)