본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주주대표소송의 활성화를 위한 소고

A Legal Study On the Activation of Shareholder's Derivative Suit

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Shareholder's derivative suit is generally defined as the class action, in which minority shareholders, on their corporation's behalf, can enforce corporate rights against the corporate directors who committed illegal acts or wrongful acts on the corporation, in case those in control of the corporation refuse to have the corporation sues directly. For the activation of the shareholder's derivative suit, first of all, the requirement of the plaintiff shareholders qualified to file a lawsuit needs to be more mitigated than status quo, depending on the size or type of the company concerned. Second, in order to file derivative suit, it is required to verify the information on the illegal act or misconduct of directors. Such verification could be effectively done through the inspection on accounting books and records. However, under the current commercial law, the right of inspection on accounting books and records is not that easy, in a way, it is even more stringent than the requirement of the derivative suit. Third, through the derivative suit, minority shareholders are given rights to accuse liability of directors on behalf of the company, which is not for the benefit of the plaintiff shareholders themselves but for the benefit of the company itself. Thus, there should be corresponding compensations for the substantial attorney's fees, the commitment of time, effort and mental stress of the minority shareholders who file the suit. Finally, derivative suit performs important functions to prevent illegal acts or misconduct of directors. Therefore, for the protection of minority shareholders and the activation of derivative suit, it is required for investor protection agencies to support the minority shareholders who prepare a derivative suit. Thus, these investor protection agencies will be able to advise the minority shareholders of the pertinent procedures and provide them with a variety of information and knowledge about derivative suit. And, the existence of such agencies will also have the effect to prevent the abuse of derivative suit and to suppress the illegal acts or misconduct of directors itself.

Abstract

Shareholder's derivative suit is generally defined as the class action, in which minority shareholders, on their corporation's behalf, can enforce corporate rights against the corporate directors who committed illegal acts or wrongful acts on the corporation, in case those in control of the corporation refuse to have the corporation sues directly. For the activation of the shareholder's derivative suit, first of all, the requirement of the plaintiff shareholders qualified to file a lawsuit needs to be more mitigated than status quo, depending on the size or type of the company concerned. Second, in order to file derivative suit, it is required to verify the information on the illegal act or misconduct of directors. Such verification could be effectively done through the inspection on accounting books and records. However, under the current commercial law, the right of inspection on accounting books and records is not that easy, in a way, it is even more stringent than the requirement of the derivative suit. Third, through the derivative suit, minority shareholders are given rights to accuse liability of directors on behalf of the company, which is not for the benefit of the plaintiff shareholders themselves but for the benefit of the company itself. Thus, there should be corresponding compensations for the substantial attorney's fees, the commitment of time, effort and mental stress of the minority shareholders who file the suit. Finally, derivative suit performs important functions to prevent illegal acts or misconduct of directors. Therefore, for the protection of minority shareholders and the activation of derivative suit, it is required for investor protection agencies to support the minority shareholders who prepare a derivative suit. Thus, these investor protection agencies will be able to advise the minority shareholders of the pertinent procedures and provide them with a variety of information and knowledge about derivative suit. And, the existence of such agencies will also have the effect to prevent the abuse of derivative suit and to suppress the illegal acts or misconduct of directors itself.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 권재열, "미국의 주주대표소송제도에 있어서 이사회에 대한 제소청구요건", 상사법연구, 16(1) (1997), 한국상사법학회
  2. 강희갑, "주주의 권리 강화를 위한 회사지배구조의 개선", 상사법연구, 19(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  3. 김대연, "株主代表訴訟에서의 擔保提供命令制度 -日本 法制의 現況을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 21(2), pp.9~396 (2002), 한국상사법학회
  4. 김병연, "한국 상법상 이사의 의무와 책임추궁", 상사법연구, 28(1), pp.93~130 (2009), 한국상사법학회
  5. 김상규, "주주의 대표소송에 관한 소고 -당사자를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 25(3), pp.177~196 (2008), 법학연구소
  6. 김영균, "주주대표소송에 있어서 담보제공제도에 관한 소고, In 상법학의 전망(평성 임홍근 교수 정년퇴임기념논문집" (2003), 법문사
  7. 김영곤, "株主의 代表訴訟에 관한 小考", 기업법연구, 11, pp.9~31 (2002), 한국기업법학회
  8. 나승성, "기업지배구조개선 권고안에 대한 의견", 고시연구 (2000)
  9. 양동석, "중소규모회사와 주주대표소송", 기업법연구, 6 (2000), 한국기업법학회
  10. 양만식, "최근 일본 회사법의 개정동향-이사의 회사에 대한 책임과 주주대표소송의 개정을 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 19(3), pp.55~82 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  11. 오성근, "주주대표소송에 관한 소고-상법과 영국의 회사법제와의 비교를 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 29(2), pp.247~283 (2010), 한국상사법학회
  12. 주주대표소송의 변호사보수 부담에 관한 연구, "윤영신", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2000)
  13. 윤영신, "주주대표소송의 변호사 보수 등 소송관련비용의 부담", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  14. 이봉의, "企業支配構造改編을 위한 株主代表訴訟 制度의 國際比較", 상사판례연구, 19(1), pp.457~500 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
  15. 李太鍾, "株主의 代表訴訟에 관한 연구 : 死文化와 濫訴의 防止를 위한 節次를 중심으로", 박사, 상사법, pp.1997
  16. 이철송, "회사법강의(제19판)" (2011), 박영사
  17. 임중호, "주식회사 감사제도의 변천과정", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  18. 임재연, "미국기업법" (2009), 박영사
  19. 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2008), 법문사
  20. 정준우, "주주대표소송의 원고적격에 관한 쟁점사항 검토", 기업법연구, 19(2), pp.129~154 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  21. 증권집단소송과 투자자보호, "정윤모", 한국증권연구원, ~ (2001)
  22. 정찬형, "2000년 정부의 상법개정안에 대한 검토의견", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  23. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
  24. 정쾌영, "대표소송의 단독주주권화와 남소 제한에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  25. 최병규, "소수주주의 권리강화를 위한 제도 개선방안 -회계장부열람청구권을 중심으로-", 경영법률, 20(2), pp.297~324 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
  26. 최현주, "株主代表訴訟의 活性化 方案에 관한 考察", 경영법률, 18(2), pp.275~297 (2008), 한국경영법률학회
  27. Deborah A. DeMott, "Shareholder Derivative Actions- Law and Practice-" (2000), west group
  28. Harry G. Henn, "Laws of Corporations" (1983), Westing Publishing Co
  29. John C. Coffee, Jr, "The Survival of The Derivative Suit : An Evaluation and a Proposal for Legislative Reform", Columbia Law Review, 81, pp.216~316 (1981)
  30. John P. Dawson, "Lawyer and Involuntary Clients in Public Interest Litigation", Harvard Law Review, 88 (1975)
  31. Robert C. Clark, "Corporate Law", ~ (1986)
  32. 近蘇光男, "取締役の 損害賠償責任" (1996), 中央經濟社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)