민사소송에서의 의사결정능력 장애인의 법적 지위: 소송무능력자제도의 개정제안
Legal Status of Persons with Impairment to Decision Making Ability: Reform Proposal on the Incapacity of Litigation Provision
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The new adult guardianship system was introduced, instead of declaration of legal incapacity regime, to provide a legal tool for supporting decision-making for persons with impaired decision making ability. For such disabled persons, it would be best to live integrated within communities without resort to guardianship. For such a goal to materialize, members of communities should develop alternative communication tools and methods to facilitate communication with persons with impaired decision making ability; lawyers should create and prepare various kinds of trusts, advance directives to medical treatment and other activities, various types of contractual guardianship forms, delegation contract forms and representation forms in order to supplement insufficient capacity of such disabled persons for supply of goods and services. Impairment to decision making ability is not unfortune occurring to exceptional scope of person, but probable risk to all of us living in the aged society and risk producing society, which we must not overlook The least and negative measures which can be taken to guarantee human dignity of such disabled persons are to ensure that the commencement of guardianship need not incur disqualification of legal rights and power and depriviation of legal capacity of litigation. What is required is to ensure that any persons who lack sufficient capacity to make decisions, whether or not resorting to guardianship, are entitled to access to and participate in legal proceedings. This article proposes that incapacity of litigation is to be decided in accordance with individual capacity to make decision on specific matters; furthermore, it proposes that even those who lack capacity of litigation should easily access to and participate in the legal proceedings by a litigation friend.
Abstract
The new adult guardianship system was introduced, instead of declaration of legal incapacity regime, to provide a legal tool for supporting decision-making for persons with impaired decision making ability. For such disabled persons, it would be best to live integrated within communities without resort to guardianship. For such a goal to materialize, members of communities should develop alternative communication tools and methods to facilitate communication with persons with impaired decision making ability; lawyers should create and prepare various kinds of trusts, advance directives to medical treatment and other activities, various types of contractual guardianship forms, delegation contract forms and representation forms in order to supplement insufficient capacity of such disabled persons for supply of goods and services. Impairment to decision making ability is not unfortune occurring to exceptional scope of person, but probable risk to all of us living in the aged society and risk producing society, which we must not overlook The least and negative measures which can be taken to guarantee human dignity of such disabled persons are to ensure that the commencement of guardianship need not incur disqualification of legal rights and power and depriviation of legal capacity of litigation. What is required is to ensure that any persons who lack sufficient capacity to make decisions, whether or not resorting to guardianship, are entitled to access to and participate in legal proceedings. This article proposes that incapacity of litigation is to be decided in accordance with individual capacity to make decision on specific matters; furthermore, it proposes that even those who lack capacity of litigation should easily access to and participate in the legal proceedings by a litigation friend.
참고문헌 (26)
- The British Medical Association and the Law Society, "Assessment of Mental Capacity" (2010), the Law Society
- Damrau, "Betreuungsrecht" (2011), W. Kohlhammer
- Mental Disability Advocacy Centre, "Legal Capacity in Europe", 21~ (2013)
- MünchKomm, "BGB", C.H. Beck
- Musilak, "Zivil Prozessordnung Kommentar" (2011), Franz Vahlen München
- National Research Council, "Improving the Social Security Disability Decision Process" (2007), the National Academies Press
- Schauffler, "The Need for Improved Adult Guardianship Data", Caseload Highlights, 15(2) (2008)
- Staudingers, "Kommentar zum BGB Buch 4" (2006), Seiler-de Gruyter
- The White Book Service, "Civil Procedure", Thomson Reuters, 1 (2013)
- Zimmerman, "Zivilprozessordnung" (2011), ZAP Verlag
- 藤田廣美, "解析民事訴訟法", 동경대학출판회
- 新アシア家族法三國會議, "成年後見制度" (2014)
- 新アシア家族法三國會議, "成年後見制度"
- 곽윤직, "민법주해 I", 박영사
- 권오용, "성년후견제도와 장애인 인권", 2013년도 정책과 대안 포럼 제1회 토론회, 한국장애인인권포럼 발표자료집
- 김상훈, "성년후견제도의 도입과 민사소송법상의 소송능력 등― 소송능력을 중심으로 ―", 강원법학, 41, pp.253~278 (2014), 비교법학연구소
- 김형석, "피성년후견인과 피한정후견인의 소송능력 ―해석론과 입법론―", 가족법연구, 27(1), pp.41~84 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 김도훈, "성년후견제도 도입에 따른 민사소송법상 소송능력에 관한 소고", 법학연구, 22(1), pp.117~137 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김홍엽, "민사소송법", 박영사
- 배인구, "성년후견제도에 관한 실무상 쟁점- 피성년후견인 등의 행위능력과 소송능력을 중심으로-", 민사실무연구회, ~
- 정선주, "행위능력제도의 변화에 따른 소송능력의 재검토", 민사소송, 18(1), pp.41~87 (2014), 한국민사소송법학회
- 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "성년후견법의 시행준비작업상의 몇 가지 이론적, 실천적 문제", 가족법연구, 27(1), pp.1~40 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 제철웅, "개정 민법상의 후견계약의 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방향 :후견대체제도의 관점을 중심으로", 민사법학, 66, pp.99~134 (2014), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "유엔 장애인권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국 성년후견제도의 현재와 미래", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.205~244 (2014), 한국가족법학회
