본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피성년후견인과 피한정후견인의 소송능력 ―해석론과 입법론―

The capacity to sue and to be sued of vulnerable adults under legal protection

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

On July 1, 2013, the reformed law regarding protection for vulnerable adults will come into force. The new law abolishes the judicial interdiction with its limited form and instead introduces the new types of protective measures, i.e. guardianship for adults, limited guardinaship, specific guardianship and guardianship contract. Among them, the former two measures usually involve the effect limiting the legal capacity of adults under protection. Here questions arise subsequently whether and how far they retain the capacity to sue and to be sued, namely to assert their rights and defend them in civil procedures. The author strives to give solutions de lege lata and de lege ferenda. For this purpose, he surveys the foreign laws, above all German, French and Japanese law. Then he submits his own interpretive suggestions concerning the transitional provisions which govern this matter for 5 years. He at last proposes a draft de lege ferenda, which he hopes would be accepted into the Code of Civil Procedure.

Abstract

On July 1, 2013, the reformed law regarding protection for vulnerable adults will come into force. The new law abolishes the judicial interdiction with its limited form and instead introduces the new types of protective measures, i.e. guardianship for adults, limited guardinaship, specific guardianship and guardianship contract. Among them, the former two measures usually involve the effect limiting the legal capacity of adults under protection. Here questions arise subsequently whether and how far they retain the capacity to sue and to be sued, namely to assert their rights and defend them in civil procedures. The author strives to give solutions de lege lata and de lege ferenda. For this purpose, he surveys the foreign laws, above all German, French and Japanese law. Then he submits his own interpretive suggestions concerning the transitional provisions which govern this matter for 5 years. He at last proposes a draft de lege ferenda, which he hopes would be accepted into the Code of Civil Procedure.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004)
  2. 곽윤직, (1992)
  3. 구상엽, "개정민법상 성년후견제도에 대한 연구 : 입법배경, 입법자의 의사 및 향후 과제를 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
  4. 김능환, "주석 민사소송법(Ⅰ)" (2012)
  5. 김현진, "프랑스의 성년후견제도 —장래보호위임계약을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 26(1), pp.71~126 (2012), 한국가족법학회
  6. 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  7. 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 입법방향", 민사법학, (18) (2000)
  8. , 2010
  9. 양창수, "성년자부조제도, In 민법산고" (1998)
  10. 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2012)
  11. 임종률, "노동법" (2012)
  12. 행위무능력제도의 재검토―성년후견 도입을 중심으로―, "제철웅", 법무부, ~ (2007)
  13. 호문혁, "민사소송법" (2010)
  14. Bienwald, "Betreuungsrecht" (2005)
  15. Bork, "Die Prozeßfähigkeit nach neuem Recht", Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht, 97 (1991)
  16. Bumiller, "FamFG. Freiwillige Gerichtsbarkeit" (2011)
  17. Cadiet, "Droit judiciare privé" (2006)
  18. Delfosse, "La réforme du droit des majeurs protégés" (2009)
  19. Erman, "Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Band 2" (2011)
  20. Goubeaux, "Traité de droit civil. Les personnes" (1989)
  21. Guinchard, "Droit et pratique de la procédure civie" (2006)
  22. Héron, "Droit judiciare privé" (2006), par Le Bars
  23. Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht" (2010)
  24. Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht kompakt" (2011)
  25. Kramer, "Juristische Methodenlehre" (2010)
  26. Marty, "Droit civil. Les personnes" (1976)
  27. Massip, "Tutelle des mineurs et protection juridique des majeurs" (2009)
  28. "Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Band 8" (2002)
  29. Musielak, "Zivilprozessordnung" (2005)
  30. Peterka, "Droit des tutelles" (2012)
  31. Rosenberg, "Zivilprozessrecht" (2004)
  32. von Sachsen-Gessaphe, "Der Betreuer als gesetzlicher Vertreter für eingeschränkt Selbstbestimmungsfähige" (1999)
  33. Stein, "Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung" (2004)
  34. Terré, "Droit. Civil. Les personnes. La famille. Les incapacités" (2005)
  35. Thomas, "Zivilprozessordnung" (2002)
  36. 伊藤眞, "民事訴訟法" (2006)
  37. 新堂幸司, "新民事訴訟法" (2008)
  38. 梶村太市, "家事事件手續法" (2007)
  39. 金子修, "一問一答 家事事件手續法" (2012)
  40. 秋武憲一, "家事事件手續法" (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)