본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토

A Study on the new adult guardianship system in the proposed amendment of the Korean Civil Code

0

조회

0

다운로드

53

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The judicial interdiction or judicial limited interdiction of the Korea Civil Code has been criticized for the neglect of the possibility for self-determination of the intellectually disabled and the defectiveness in protecting them about their personal affairs. The new adult guardianship system with the three types of judicial protection(guardianship for adults, limited guardianship, specific guardianship) and contract of the guardianship for amendment of the Korean Civil Code has been proposed by government, in order to help the intellectually disabled for self-determination and to support them about the personal affairs, such as the consent for the intellectually disabled to be operated, which might be the cause for death or serious damage. The purpose of this study is to examine the construction and the practical problems of the new adult guardianship system that would be effective in the near future. This study results in several main conclusions. First, it is desired for the supervisor of the adult guardian to be appointed all the time in judicial protection system. Second, the guardian in the contract of guardianship may be granted not only the representative authority but also the right to consent and revoke the legal act by the intellectually disabled. also the judicial protection and the contract of the guardianship may have an effect simultaneously.

Abstract

The judicial interdiction or judicial limited interdiction of the Korea Civil Code has been criticized for the neglect of the possibility for self-determination of the intellectually disabled and the defectiveness in protecting them about their personal affairs. The new adult guardianship system with the three types of judicial protection(guardianship for adults, limited guardianship, specific guardianship) and contract of the guardianship for amendment of the Korean Civil Code has been proposed by government, in order to help the intellectually disabled for self-determination and to support them about the personal affairs, such as the consent for the intellectually disabled to be operated, which might be the cause for death or serious damage. The purpose of this study is to examine the construction and the practical problems of the new adult guardianship system that would be effective in the near future. This study results in several main conclusions. First, it is desired for the supervisor of the adult guardian to be appointed all the time in judicial protection system. Second, the guardian in the contract of guardianship may be granted not only the representative authority but also the right to consent and revoke the legal act by the intellectually disabled. also the judicial protection and the contract of the guardianship may have an effect simultaneously.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김주수, "민법총칙(제5판)" (2005), 법문사
  2. 이영준, "민법총칙(한국민법론Ⅰ)" (2005), 박영사
  3. 성년후견제도 연구, "성년후견제도연구회", 사법연구재단, ~ (2007)
  4. 김동호, "성년후견제를 위한 민법개정안에 대하여", 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안공청회 자료집, pp.85~ (2009), 법무부
  5. 김형석, "민법개정안 해설", 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료집, pp.1~ (2009), 법무부
  6. 민유숙, "후견공시제도와 예산지원", 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료집(법무부), pp.101~ (2009)
  7. 백승흠, "민법개정안의 성년후견법제가 갖는 특징", 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료집, pp.59~ (2009), 법무부
  8. 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 입법방향", 민사법학, (18), pp.156~ (2000)
  9. 백승흠, "현행 성년자보호를 위한 제도의 문제점과 대안으로서의 성년후견제도", 민사법학, (24), pp.407~ (2003), 한국민사법학회
  10. 신영호, "고령사회에 있어서의 후견제도", 가족법연구, (11), pp.366~ (1997)
  11. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  12. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 도입논의와 영국의 정신능력법의 시사점", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.275~310 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  13. 二宮周平, "家族法" (2009), 新世社
  14. 佐久間毅, "民法の基礎1" (2009), 有斐閣
  15. 新井 誠, "成年後見制度" (2009), 有斐閣
  16. 小林昭彦, "新成年後見制度の解說" (2000), 金融財政事情硏究會
  17. 最高裁判所事務總局家政局, "成年後見關係事件の槪況 ― 平成 20年1月~12月"
  18. 岡部 喜代子, "日本における成年後見制度の問題点", 한림법학 FORUM, 통권 : 20 (2009)
  19. 岡孝, "日本任意後見法의 槪要와 問題點", 한림법학 FORUM, 통권 : 21 (2010)
  20. 多田宏治, "日本任意後見制度の現狀と課題", 學習院大學 東洋文化硏究所 東アジア比較民法硏究會 (2009)
  21. "任意後見制度に関する改善提言"[URL]
  22. "任意後見制 度の改善提言と司法書士の任意後見執務に対する提案"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)