본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대계몽기 국어 교과서에 드러나는 종성에 대한 인식과 표기 양상

Recognition and aspects of writing about a final consonant Korean textbook in Enlightenment period.

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this article is examining the recognition and aspects of writing about a final consonant which is one of the linguistic features appeared in Korean textbook in Enlightenment period. In Enlightenment period, 7 consonants, which are ‘ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅇ’, were used in the space of a final consonant. However, Korean textbook proposes 8~9 phonemes as a final consonant. Each textbooks showed different kind and number of consonants. The phonemes ‘ㄷ’ and ‘ㅣ’ showed a difference to others. In the case of ‘ㄷ’, it is the result of following the explanation of traditional orthography. Although ‘ㅣ’ is a vowel, it is sorted as a final consonant in several textbooks. The compiler of the textbook may recognize a final consonant as the sound that united thirdly. In this period, the standard orthography was not established. Therefore, the orthography of a continual spelling, a separate spelling, a double spelling, and a double phonemic writing was mixed. In a declension, a separate spelling mainly used and there was no continual spelling in the declension in some textbooks. In an inflection, there was not a big difference in the frequency of words that used a continual spelling, a separate spelling, and a double spelling. Most of verb stem final ‘ㄹ’ was written in a continual spelling in the inflection. Consonants which showed excessive syllabication in a morpheme are ‘ㄱ, ㄴ, ㅁ, ㅂ’. They were mostly syllabicated in both declension and inflection. In the case of double final consonants, only ‘ㄺ’ and ‘ㄼ’ used maintained form. Other than that, a continual spelling or a simplification of a consonant cluster occurred.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is examining the recognition and aspects of writing about a final consonant which is one of the linguistic features appeared in Korean textbook in Enlightenment period. In Enlightenment period, 7 consonants, which are ‘ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅇ’, were used in the space of a final consonant. However, Korean textbook proposes 8~9 phonemes as a final consonant. Each textbooks showed different kind and number of consonants. The phonemes ‘ㄷ’ and ‘ㅣ’ showed a difference to others. In the case of ‘ㄷ’, it is the result of following the explanation of traditional orthography. Although ‘ㅣ’ is a vowel, it is sorted as a final consonant in several textbooks. The compiler of the textbook may recognize a final consonant as the sound that united thirdly. In this period, the standard orthography was not established. Therefore, the orthography of a continual spelling, a separate spelling, a double spelling, and a double phonemic writing was mixed. In a declension, a separate spelling mainly used and there was no continual spelling in the declension in some textbooks. In an inflection, there was not a big difference in the frequency of words that used a continual spelling, a separate spelling, and a double spelling. Most of verb stem final ‘ㄹ’ was written in a continual spelling in the inflection. Consonants which showed excessive syllabication in a morpheme are ‘ㄱ, ㄴ, ㅁ, ㅂ’. They were mostly syllabicated in both declension and inflection. In the case of double final consonants, only ‘ㄺ’ and ‘ㄼ’ used maintained form. Other than that, a continual spelling or a simplification of a consonant cluster occurred.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김은솔, "근대계몽기 한글 학습서의 표기와 음운 현상 - 『초학언문』의 세 가지 이본을 중심으로", 인문과학, 120, pp.51~86 (2020), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  2. 김억수, "개화기의 국어교과서 고찰", 어문론집, 14, pp.7~14 (1979), 중앙어문학회
  3. 김중진, "국어표기사연구" (1999), 태학사
  4. 남영주, "개화기 국어 표기법 연구 : 개화기 국어 교과서를 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.2001
  5. 송미영, "개화기 국어과 교과서의 표기와 음운 연구", 박사, pp.2017
  6. 신성철, "음절말 'ㅅ'과 'ㄷ'의 표기 변화에 대한 연구 : 16·17세기 국어를 중심으로", 박사, 국어학, pp.2005
  7. 이기동, "개화기 교과서의 표기와 음운현상", 한국학연구, 6, pp.157~179 (1994), 고려대 한국학연구소
  8. 이기문, "국어사개설" (1998), 태학사
  9. 이동석, "팔종성법의 실현 양상과 음운론적인 해석", 국어사연구, (31), pp.63~135 (2020), 국어사학회[DOI]
  10. 이익섭, "국어표기법연구" (1992), 서울대학교출판부
  11. 이준환, "개화기 교과서의 표기와 음운의 연구 성과 및 전망", 국어사연구, (26), pp.7~57 (2018), 국어사학회[DOI]
  12. 정길남, "개화기 교과서의 우리말 연구" (1997), 박이정
  13. 정승철, "국어의 시대별 변천 연구 4" (1999), 국립국어연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)