중국의 근대시기 표음화 논쟁에 관한 소고 - 언문일치 운동에 대한 고찰을 중심으로 -
A study on the arguments about phoneticism in China’s Modern Era
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is about the arguments about phoneticism in China's modern Era. In the past, many Chinese intellectuals insisted on abolishing Chinese characters, since they are too difficult for common people to learn, write, and remember. They thought that the difficult Chinese characters caused the downfall of China. Thus, there were several steps of movements for the identity of the written and spoken language. However, Chinese characters are still kept as the only formal letter in China, because it survived through the arguments of repealing Chinese characters. Probably, Chinese characters will not be abolished in the future. However, problematic situations often happen, because Chinese characters are used to transcribe foreign sounds such as phonetic symbols, even though they are ideograms. The most important part of the characters as an ideogram is the meaning, but sometimes the meaning is ignored for the phonetic representation of foreign sounds. Chinese phonetic loans show this situation well.
Abstract
This study is about the arguments about phoneticism in China's modern Era. In the past, many Chinese intellectuals insisted on abolishing Chinese characters, since they are too difficult for common people to learn, write, and remember. They thought that the difficult Chinese characters caused the downfall of China. Thus, there were several steps of movements for the identity of the written and spoken language. However, Chinese characters are still kept as the only formal letter in China, because it survived through the arguments of repealing Chinese characters. Probably, Chinese characters will not be abolished in the future. However, problematic situations often happen, because Chinese characters are used to transcribe foreign sounds such as phonetic symbols, even though they are ideograms. The most important part of the characters as an ideogram is the meaning, but sometimes the meaning is ignored for the phonetic representation of foreign sounds. Chinese phonetic loans show this situation well.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김상원, "文體의 統一과 ‘國語’의 建立", 중국문학연구, (30), pp.33~62 (2005), 한국중문학회
- 류준필, "‘文言ㆍ白話’를 넘어서 ―근대 중국에서 ‘국어’ 문제", 중국현대문학, (36), pp.163~207 (2006), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 문승용, "新文化運動 시기 語文改革論의 연원 고찰 - 梁啓超를 중심으로 -", 중국어교육과 연구, (11), pp.1~19 (2010), 한국중국어교육학회
- 백지운, "근대 중국 언어운동의 스펙트럼", 역사비평, (70), pp.346~365 (2005), 역사문제연구소
- 양세욱, "근대 이행기 중국의 자국어 인식", 한국학연구, (30), pp.93~121 (2013), 한국학연구소
- 전형준, "' 신문학운동 ' 시기의 언문일치론에 대한 검토", 중국어문학지, (4), pp.29~50 (1997), 중국어문학회
- 조현국, "瞿秋白의 ‘漢字 라틴화’論에 대한 재고찰", 중국어문학논집, (73), pp.301~324 (2012), 중국어문학연구회
- 차태근, "한자형상과 중국의 “각성” ― 한자 페시미즘에서 세계어로", 중국현대문학, (36), pp.1~27 (2006), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 한용수, "중국 근대언어정책과 정치배경", 중국인문학회 학술대회 발표논문집, pp.185~201 (2003)
- 關甲, "重新論證文字改革的方向", 語文建設, 5, pp.25~ (1985)
- 胡錦賢, "年漢字改革運動的反思", 湖北大學學報(社會科學版), 1, pp.5~8 (2007)
- 黃曉蕾, "吳稚暉和中國現代語言規劃", 語言文字應用, 2, pp.29~134 (2005)
- 劉春, "淸末至五四時期漢字改革的現代性訴求", 江漢論壇, 1, pp.84~88 (2011)
- 劉曉明, "淸末至新中國成立(1892-1949)漢字改革史論", 博士, pp.2012
- 羅常培, "語言與文化" (1989), 語文出版社
- 倪海曙, "淸末漢語拼音運動編年史" (1959), 文字改革出版社
- 莫志斌, "“五四”新文化運動:推動中國語言文化發展的努力", 湖南師範大學社會科學學報, 1, pp.123~127 (2010)
- 王寧, "二十世紀漢字問題的爭論與跨世紀的漢字硏究", 中國社會科學, 1, pp.153~167 (1997)
- 吳悅, "淸末切音字運動淺探", 復旦學報, 4, pp.57~61 (1987)
- 張文淸, "語言規劃視覺下的中國漢字改革", 高等函授學報, 10, pp.45~52 (2010)
- 周有光, "切音字運動百年祭", 語文建設, 5, pp.34~35 (1992)
- 鄒德文, "談漢字改革的緣起—對百年文字改革運動的反思", 長春師範學院學報, 12, pp.53~56 (2001)