본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대계몽기 ‘국문론’의 레퍼런스에 대하여

References of ‘Korean alphabet theory’ in modern enlightenment period

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The core of the various discussions on ‘Korean alphabet’ conducted during the modern enlightenment period was that Korean alphabet should be used instead of Chinese character when entering a new era. In the process, the reasons generally presented to support the merits of Korean alphabet over Chinese character were that Korean alphabet is a phonetic symbol unlike Chinese character and that phonogram had been more advantageous for universalization of knowledge and achievement of national prosperity and military power as it was proved by Western alphabets. However, actually the Korean alphabet during that time was not read so easily and various proposals were made for solution of such problems. The focus was shifted from the issue of ‘what kind of alphabet’ to ‘how to use it’. The question raised from this was the ‘original form, principle, system, etc. of Korean alphabet’. This, too, was the reason why various references were quoted or referred to for ‘Korean Alphabet Theory’. This study aims to investigate the references referred to in the process of the development of Korean Alphabet Theory in modern enlightenment period and their influence on the discussions conducted during that time.

Abstract

The core of the various discussions on ‘Korean alphabet’ conducted during the modern enlightenment period was that Korean alphabet should be used instead of Chinese character when entering a new era. In the process, the reasons generally presented to support the merits of Korean alphabet over Chinese character were that Korean alphabet is a phonetic symbol unlike Chinese character and that phonogram had been more advantageous for universalization of knowledge and achievement of national prosperity and military power as it was proved by Western alphabets. However, actually the Korean alphabet during that time was not read so easily and various proposals were made for solution of such problems. The focus was shifted from the issue of ‘what kind of alphabet’ to ‘how to use it’. The question raised from this was the ‘original form, principle, system, etc. of Korean alphabet’. This, too, was the reason why various references were quoted or referred to for ‘Korean Alphabet Theory’. This study aims to investigate the references referred to in the process of the development of Korean Alphabet Theory in modern enlightenment period and their influence on the discussions conducted during that time.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 지석영, "국문론", 대조선독립협회보 (1896)
  2. 주시경, "국문론", 독립신문 134호, ~ (1897)
  3. 주시경, "국문론", 독립신문 47호, ~ (1897)
  4. 미상, "국문원류", 황성신문 97호, ~ (1899)
  5. 주시경, "주시경전서 1" (1992), 탑출판사
  6. 주시경, "주시경전서 1" (1992), 탑출판사
  7. 미상, "국문원류", 소년한반도 1호, ~ (1905)
  8. 주시경, "주시경전서 1" (1992), 탑출판사
  9. 국문연구소, "역대한국문법대계 제3부 6책" (2008), 박이정
  10. 어윤적, "玄妙한 原 則을 保守하라 - 諺文綴字法에 就하야", 매일신보, ~ (1921)
  11. 오구라 신페이, "문자와 발음을 동일하게 하난것이 타당하다", 매일신보, ~ (1921)
  12. 김민수, "신정국문”에 관한 연구 ― 특히“이으” 합음과 아래아를 문제로 하여", 아세아연구, 6(1), pp.205~247 (1963)
  13. 김병문, "들리지 않는 소리, 혹은 발설되지 않는 말과 ‘국어’의 구상 — 근대계몽기 국문 담론 분석 —", 개념과 소통, (15), pp.155~188 (2015), 한림과학원[DOI]
  14. 김병문, "언어적 근대의 기획 ― 주시경과 그의 시대" (2013), 소명출판
  15. 김병문, "「한글 마춤법 통일안」(1933) 총론의 ‘소리대로 적되 어법에 맞도록 한다’는 규정의 역사적 의미 검토 - 당대의 논의를 중심으로 -", 언어사실과 관점, 44, pp.169~203 (2018), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
  16. 김정주, "惠齋 魚允迪의 國語學的 業績에 대한 再照明", 진단학보, (128), pp.99~124 (2017), 진단학회
  17. 김주원, "훈민정음 언해본의 정본 제작에 관한 연구", 국어사연구, 7, pp.7~40 (2007)
  18. 심경호, "한국의 운서와 운서 활용 방식", 한자한문연구, 5, pp.137~180 (2009)
  19. 오영섭, "朝鮮光文會 硏究", 韓國史學史學報, (3), pp.79~140 (2001), 한국사학사학회
  20. 개화기의 국문연구, "이기문", 한국문화연구소, ~ (1970)
  21. 정경일, "조선시대의 운서이용 양상", 한국어학, 7, pp.259~281 (1998)
  22. 정구복, "『문헌비고』의 자료적 성격과 사학사적 의미", 진단학보, (106), pp.167~190 (2008), 진단학회
  23. 한동완, "국문연구의정안" (2006), 신구문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)