부사 ‘다’의 의미와 기능
Meanings and Functions of Korean adverb ‘da'
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to study meanings and functions of Korean qualifier ‘da’. ‘da’ is classifiedd into two categories; quantifying expressions and non-quantifiying expressions. There are some syntactic restrictions and semantic characteristics which distinguish adverb ‘da’ from noun ‘da’. Adverb ‘da’ usually modifies preceding elements in a sentence and is regarded to make them focus of the sentence. ‘da’ should be studied in semantic/pragmatic level in that ‘da’ fucntions as modal adverb. Especially, non-qualifying expression ‘da’ shows very peculiar semantic characteristics. Using non-qualifying ‘da’, speaker expresses unexpectedness and value judgment in their recogntion category. Moreover, ‘da’ indicates and modifies pragmatic situations. Sometimes it collocates with some modal propositions or is replaced by them. ‘da’ is used as modaliy expression in spoken language and discourse but it is not enough to define it as discourse marker.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to study meanings and functions of Korean qualifier ‘da’. ‘da’ is classifiedd into two categories; quantifying expressions and non-quantifiying expressions. There are some syntactic restrictions and semantic characteristics which distinguish adverb ‘da’ from noun ‘da’. Adverb ‘da’ usually modifies preceding elements in a sentence and is regarded to make them focus of the sentence. ‘da’ should be studied in semantic/pragmatic level in that ‘da’ fucntions as modal adverb. Especially, non-qualifying expression ‘da’ shows very peculiar semantic characteristics. Using non-qualifying ‘da’, speaker expresses unexpectedness and value judgment in their recogntion category. Moreover, ‘da’ indicates and modifies pragmatic situations. Sometimes it collocates with some modal propositions or is replaced by them. ‘da’ is used as modaliy expression in spoken language and discourse but it is not enough to define it as discourse marker.
참고문헌 (17)
- 고영근, "우리말문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 구일민, "양화사 ‘다’의 의미와 과장법 기제로서의 화용론적 해석 가능성", 한국어 의미학, 23, pp.1~20 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 구종남, "화용표지 ‘좀’에 대하여", 한국언어문학, 41, pp.1~434 (1998), 한국언어문학회
- 구종남, "담화표지 ‘다’에 대하여", 한국언어문학, (67), pp.37~59 (2008), 한국언어문학회
- 김명희, "국어 의문사의 담화표지화", 담화와 인지, 12(2), pp.41~64 (2005), 담화·인지언어학회
- 김현주, "양화사 ‘다’의 형성과 의미 확장", Journal of korean Culture, 16, pp.1~29 (2011), 한국언어문화학술확산연구소
- 심란희, "담화표지 ‘그냥’의 기능 연구", 어문론총, (59), pp.155~186 (2013), 한국문학언어학회[DOI]
- 안주호, "축약형 담화표지 “좀", 막”에 대한 연구, 2009, pp.(14), 199~223[DOI]
- 양해승, "한국어의 주관량(主觀量, Subjective Quantity) 표현 연구", 國語學, (71), pp.127~188 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이은령, "‘결국’의 의미와 화용적 기능", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (64), pp.5~36 (2013), 한민족어문학회
- 임규흥, "국어 정도 부사의 화용화", 언어과학연구, 24, pp.283~302 (2003), 언어과학회
- 장경현, "‘좀’의 의미와 담화 기능", 국어문학, 61(61), pp.77~102 (2016), 국어문학회[DOI]
- 정대호, "‘-이나’와 ‘-도’의 의미론: 분류사구와 결합하는 경우를 중심으로", 어학연구, 38(1), pp.319~338 (2002), 언어교육원
- 정상희, "‘씩’의 기능과 의미 확장", 한국어 의미학, 49, pp.33~57 (2015), 한국어의미학회
- 채옥자, "한국어 주관적 수량 표현에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 46, pp.351~377 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 최재희, "한국어 전칭양화사 구문의구조와 의미 해석", 한글, (267), pp.89~118 (2005), 한글학회
- 황병순, "양태조사 연구―문법화를 통해―", 한글, (290), pp.203~230 (2010), 한글학회