한국어 유동양화사의 부사어적 성격으로 인한 의미·화용적 영향에 관한 연구
A Study on the Semantic and Pragmatic Consequences of the Adverbial Nature of Floating Quantifiers in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the semantic and pragmatic consequences of the adverbial nature carried by floating quantifiers in Korean. It is assumed in this paper that floating quantifiers in Korean carry the adverbial nature rather than the stranding one which relates the floating quantifiers with their head nouns in syntactic analysis. The adverbial nature of Korean floating quantifiers produces some semantic and pragmatic consequences. In other words, the adverbials in Korean often contribute to the production of semantic ambiguities and pragmatic ‘focus’ and ‘presentative’ function in the sentence information structures. The semantic consequences relate to the semantic ambiguity caused by floating quantifiers. The use of floating quantifiers causes the preferences for the partitive and/or distributive reading rather than exhaustive and/or collective reading, respectively. The pragmatic consequences of Korean floating quantifiers, however, relate to focus and presentative function. The focus function of floating quantifiers in Korean derives from preverbal focus universal hypothesis(Kim, 1985) in that the floating quantifiers stand close to verbs in the sentence-final position. The presentative function of floating quantifiers in turn derives from their usual preverbal positionings and their resultant focus status.
Abstract
This paper investigates the semantic and pragmatic consequences of the adverbial nature carried by floating quantifiers in Korean. It is assumed in this paper that floating quantifiers in Korean carry the adverbial nature rather than the stranding one which relates the floating quantifiers with their head nouns in syntactic analysis. The adverbial nature of Korean floating quantifiers produces some semantic and pragmatic consequences. In other words, the adverbials in Korean often contribute to the production of semantic ambiguities and pragmatic ‘focus’ and ‘presentative’ function in the sentence information structures. The semantic consequences relate to the semantic ambiguity caused by floating quantifiers. The use of floating quantifiers causes the preferences for the partitive and/or distributive reading rather than exhaustive and/or collective reading, respectively. The pragmatic consequences of Korean floating quantifiers, however, relate to focus and presentative function. The focus function of floating quantifiers in Korean derives from preverbal focus universal hypothesis(Kim, 1985) in that the floating quantifiers stand close to verbs in the sentence-final position. The presentative function of floating quantifiers in turn derives from their usual preverbal positionings and their resultant focus status.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강범모, "유동 양화사의 의미와 화용", 언어학, (26), pp.3~41 (2000), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 김용하, "한국어 유동 양화사의 통사론", 시학과 언어학, (15), pp.241~275 (2008), 시학과언어학회
- 김태인, "‘-은", 는’이 결합하는 일부 한국어 부사어의 정보 구조에 대하여, 2019, pp.80(3), 465~500[DOI]
- 문숙영, "한국어의 부사 및 부사절의 언어유형적 특징", 국어국문학, (187), pp.5~53 (2019), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 박선옥, "양화사의 위치와 담화적 기능", 영미어문학, 50, pp.245~266 (1997)
- 엄정호, "전칭 양화 부사의 의미", 배달말, 21, pp.1~28 (1996)
- 한정한, "수량사 유동 구문의 정보구조", 한국어 의미학, 6, pp.233~247 (2000)
- Cinque, G., "Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Downing, P, "Noun Classes and Categorization", pp.344~375 (1986), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Jung, Y., "Interpretation of Noun Phrases and Its Syntactic and Semantic Implication", 박사, pp.1997
- Kang, B, "Categories and Meanings of Korean Floating Quantifiers -With Some Reference to Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.375~398 (2002)
- Kayne, R., "French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle" (1975), MIT Press
- Kim, A., "Grammar of Focus in Korean Syntax and Its Typological Implications", 박사, pp.1985
- Kobuchi-Philip, M, "Floating Numerals and Floating Quantifiers", Lingua, 117, pp.814~831 (2007)
- 이용훈, "유동양화사와 매핑 가설", 현대문법연구, (35), pp.203~222 (2004), 현대문법학회
- Li, C, "Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
- Li, W, "The Pragmatics of Existential-presentative Constructions in Chinese: A Discourse-based Study", International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1(2), pp.244~274 (2014)
- Miyagawa, S., "Structure and Case Marking in Japanese" (1989), Academic Press
- Nakanishi, K., "Domains of Measurement: Formal Properties of Non-split", Split Quantifier Constructions, University of Pennsylvania, 2004
- Porhiel, S, "The Presentative Voici", Voilà: Towards a Pragmatic Definition, 2012, pp.44(4), 435~452
- Sawyer, J, "Existential Sentences: A Linguistic Universal", American Speech, 48(3-4), pp.239~245 (1973)
- Sportiche, D, "A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.425~449 (1988)