《설문해자(說文解字)》의 사론(䛐論) 연구-‘사(䛐)’자 풀이에 드러난 ‘의(意)’와 ‘언(言)’의 관계-
On the theory and meaning of ‘ci(䛐)’ in Shuowenjiezi說文解字
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In his postscript敘 Shuowenjiezi說文解字, Xushen許愼 suggested character writing, Wen文, as the fundamental source in linguistic activities and emphasized the perpetuity of Wen文, being irrelevant to time and place. His idea had been basically succeeded from Han dynasty. He insisted that Wen文 would not change its essence, even though cangxie倉頡's shuxie書契, letter inscriptions, had been developed into various styles of writings which were called shuti書體, and they would change through time. Thanks to Xushen, the Chinese civilization was able to have its unique character writing system and studies of characters. However, intentions and thoughts cannot be accurately expressed merely by images, figures, and shapes. Vocal sound and speaking are also essential in the process of communication. Would a delicate and exquisite character writing system be sufficient enough to solve this problem? Xushen might have been perplexed confronting this question. We can find traces of his intellectual suffering in his book Shuowenjiezi說文解字, which focuses on explaining each and every character in detail. A typical example would be the character ‘ci䛐’ and the words that include it. By focusing on the usage of ci䛐, this article aims to explain the process in establishing Xushen’s theory.
Abstract
In his postscript敘 Shuowenjiezi說文解字, Xushen許愼 suggested character writing, Wen文, as the fundamental source in linguistic activities and emphasized the perpetuity of Wen文, being irrelevant to time and place. His idea had been basically succeeded from Han dynasty. He insisted that Wen文 would not change its essence, even though cangxie倉頡's shuxie書契, letter inscriptions, had been developed into various styles of writings which were called shuti書體, and they would change through time. Thanks to Xushen, the Chinese civilization was able to have its unique character writing system and studies of characters. However, intentions and thoughts cannot be accurately expressed merely by images, figures, and shapes. Vocal sound and speaking are also essential in the process of communication. Would a delicate and exquisite character writing system be sufficient enough to solve this problem? Xushen might have been perplexed confronting this question. We can find traces of his intellectual suffering in his book Shuowenjiezi說文解字, which focuses on explaining each and every character in detail. A typical example would be the character ‘ci䛐’ and the words that include it. By focusing on the usage of ci䛐, this article aims to explain the process in establishing Xushen’s theory.
참고문헌 (13)
- 염정삼, "象形性에 의한 중국 문자 의미 분류에 관하여 -≪說文解字≫의 예를 중심으로", 중국문학, 59, pp.297~318 (2009), 한국중국어문학회
- "중국문학", 2011, ~
- "중국문학", 2012, ~
- "중국문학", 2013, ~
- 염정삼, "說文解字注部首字譯解" (2007), 서울대출판부
- 염정삼, "문헌과 주석" (2013), 소명출판
- 묵자, "묵경." (2012), 한길사
- 김진성, "아리스토텔레스: 범주론, 명제론" (2005), 이제이북스
- 플라톤, "크라튈로스" (2007), 이제이북스
- 許愼, "說文解字"
- 段玉裁, "說文解字注"
- 古文字詁林編纂委員會, "古文字詁林" (2004), 上海敎育出版社
- 周法高, "金文詁林補" (1997), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
