자기공명영상에서 ACR 팬텀을 이용한 잡음전력스펙트럼 평가
Evaluation of the Noise Power Spectrum by Using American College of Radiology Phantom for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was purpose to quantitative evaluation of comparison of the image intensity uniformity and noise power spectrum (NPS) by using American college of radiology (ACR) phantom for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI was used achiva 3.0T MRI and discovery MR 750, 3.0T, the head and neck matrix shim SENSE head coil were 32 channels receive MR coil. The MRI was used parameters of image sequence for ACR standard and general hospital. NPS value of the ACR standard T2 vertical image in GE equipment was 7.65E-06 when the frequency was 1.0 mm-1. And the NPS value of the ACR hospital T1 region of interest (ROI) 9 over all vertical image in Philips equipment was 9E-08 when the frequency was 1.0 mm-1 and the NPS value of the hospital T2 ROI 9 over all vertical image in Philips equipment was 1.06E-07 when the frequency was 1.0 mm-1. NPS was used efficiently by using a general hospital vertical sequence more than the standard vertical sequence method by using the ACR phantom. Furthermore NPS was the quantitative quality assurance (QA) assessment method for noise and image intensity uniformity characteristics was applied mutatis mutandis, and the results values of the physical imaging NPS of the 3.0T MRI and ACR phantom were presented.
Abstract
This study was purpose to quantitative evaluation of comparison of the image intensity uniformity and noise power spectrum (NPS) by using American college of radiology (ACR) phantom for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI was used achiva 3.0T MRI and discovery MR 750, 3.0T, the head and neck matrix shim SENSE head coil were 32 channels receive MR coil. The MRI was used parameters of image sequence for ACR standard and general hospital. NPS value of the ACR standard T2 vertical image in GE equipment was 7.65E-06 when the frequency was 1.0 mm-1. And the NPS value of the ACR hospital T1 region of interest (ROI) 9 over all vertical image in Philips equipment was 9E-08 when the frequency was 1.0 mm-1 and the NPS value of the hospital T2 ROI 9 over all vertical image in Philips equipment was 1.06E-07 when the frequency was 1.0 mm-1. NPS was used efficiently by using a general hospital vertical sequence more than the standard vertical sequence method by using the ACR phantom. Furthermore NPS was the quantitative quality assurance (QA) assessment method for noise and image intensity uniformity characteristics was applied mutatis mutandis, and the results values of the physical imaging NPS of the 3.0T MRI and ACR phantom were presented.
참고문헌 (20)
- Miyati T, "Measurements of MTF and SNR(f)using a subtraction method im MRI", Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47, pp.2961~2972 (2002)
- Hahm HK, "The study on the subject development of MRI image quality evaluation", Department of Radiology, pp.2008
- Lee JW, "Usefulness of ACR MRI phantom for quality assurance of MRI instruments", Journal Korean Society Radiology, 54(1), pp.47~55 (2006)
- "Phantom test guidance for the ACR MRI accreditation program" (2000)[URL]
- "MRI quality control manual" (2004)[URL]
- Min JW, "Study on the resolution characteristics by using magnetic resonance imaging 3. 0T", Journal of Radiological Science and Tec hnology, 43(4), pp.251~257 (2020)
- Min JW, "Evaluation of noise power spectrum characteristics by using magnetic resonance imaging 3. 0T", Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 44(1), pp.279~288 (2021)
- Min JW, "Evaluation of the resolution characteristics by using American college of radiology phantom for magnetic resonance imaging", Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 45(1), pp.11~17 (2022)[DOI]
- Jeong HW, "Performance characteristic of a CsI(Tl)flat panel detector radiography system", Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 35(2), pp.109~117 (2012)
- Min JW, "Evaluation of the resolution characteristics by using ATS 535H phantom for ultrasound medical imaging", Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 46(1), pp.15~21 (2023)[DOI]
- Kim KW, "Measurement of image quality according to the time of computed radiography system", Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 38(4), pp.365~374 (2015)
- Min JW, "Comparison of noise power spectrum in measurements by using international electrotechnical commission standard devices in indirect digital radiography", Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 41(5), pp.457~462 (2018)
- "IEC(International Electrotechnical Commission)62220-1. Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices Part 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency" (2003)[URL]
- Och JG, "Acceptance testing of magnetic resonance imaging systems : Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group No. 6", Med Phys, 19, pp.217~229 (1992)
- Choi YJ, "Evaluation of TOF MR anagiography and imaging for the half scan factor of cerebral artery", Journal of the Korean Magnetics Society, 26(3), pp.92~98 (2016)
- Mohapatra SM, "Transfer function measurement and analysis for magnetic resonance imager", Med. Phys, 18(6), pp.1141~1144 (1991)
- Fujita H, "A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 11(1), pp.34~39 (1992)
- Samei E, "A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device", Medical Physics, 25(1), pp.102~113 (1998)
- Greer PB, "Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method", Medical Physics, 27(9), pp.2048~2059 (2000)
- Steckner MC, "Computing the modulation transfer function of a magnetic resonance imager", Med. Phys, 21(3), pp.483~489 (1994)