번역학은 설명의 과학인가? - 체스터먼(Chesterman)에 대한 비판적 논의를 중심으로 -
Should the Study of Translation be the Science of Explanation?
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Translation Studies seems to be in the pursuit of its rightful destination. Should it be a branch of empirical human science, based upon accurate hypothesis and verification? Or rather should it be a science of philosophical, speculative and interpretative descriptions? Several attempts have been made to explicate this matter in more concrete and undeniably persuasive manners with relevant theories and procedures learned from neighboring academic disciplines. Still, however, one can rarely find the very solutions that can encompass, or rather guide all the conflicting discussions witnessed in Translation Studies into the ultimate direction. Taking this situation into account, it is worthwhile to take note of Andrew Chesterman, a scholar from Finland who takes an meta-theoretical approach in Translation Studies. This paper gives an overview of major arguments made by Chesterman, whose basic idea is that Translation Studies can establish itself as a discipline of empirical human science based upon hypothesis and explanation. It then moves on to look at their implications and limitations. Concurrently, this paper intends to look into other points hardly noticed by Chesterman. That is, how, more interpretative and non essentialist discussions can be applicable to the area of Translation Studies.
Abstract
Translation Studies seems to be in the pursuit of its rightful destination. Should it be a branch of empirical human science, based upon accurate hypothesis and verification? Or rather should it be a science of philosophical, speculative and interpretative descriptions? Several attempts have been made to explicate this matter in more concrete and undeniably persuasive manners with relevant theories and procedures learned from neighboring academic disciplines. Still, however, one can rarely find the very solutions that can encompass, or rather guide all the conflicting discussions witnessed in Translation Studies into the ultimate direction. Taking this situation into account, it is worthwhile to take note of Andrew Chesterman, a scholar from Finland who takes an meta-theoretical approach in Translation Studies. This paper gives an overview of major arguments made by Chesterman, whose basic idea is that Translation Studies can establish itself as a discipline of empirical human science based upon hypothesis and explanation. It then moves on to look at their implications and limitations. Concurrently, this paper intends to look into other points hardly noticed by Chesterman. That is, how, more interpretative and non essentialist discussions can be applicable to the area of Translation Studies.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김지원, "번역 연구의 발전과 번역학의 현황", 번역학 연구, 1, pp.9~29 (2000)
- 앙트완 베르만, "낯선 것으로부터 오는 시련" (2009), 철학과현실사
- 유명우, "한국의 번역과 번역학", 번역학 연구, 1, pp.229~247 (2000)
- 이향, "Snell-Hornby를 중심으로 살펴본 번역학에서의 학제성 개념 고찰", 국제회의통역과번역, 9(1), pp.55~72 (2007), 한국통역번역학회
- 이향, "해석이론의 특징과 한계", 번역학연구, 10(1), pp.121~140 (2009), 한국번역학회
- 제니 윌리엄스, "번역학 연구의 길잡이" (2006), 이지북스
- 크리스챤 노드, "번역행위의 목적성" (2005), 한국외국어대학교출판부
- 포르투나토 이스라엘, "통번역과 등가 - 번역적 관계이론", pp.33~56 (2004), 한국문화사
- 폰 리히트, G. H., "설명과 이해" (1995), 서광사
- 폴 리쾨르, "시간과 이야기, 2" (2000), 문학과지성사
- 헴펠, C. G., "自然科學哲學" (1981), 양영각
- Cherterman, A., "Shared ground in translation studies", Target, 12(1), pp.151~160 (2000)
- Chesterman, A., "Memes of translation: The spread of ideas in translatin theory" (1997), John Benjamins Publishing company
- Chesterman, A., "What constitutes “progress” in Translation Studies? in : Birgitta Englund Dimitrova", pp.5~6 (2000), Rapport från ASLA:s höstsymposium
- Chesterman, A., "Empirical research methods in Translation Studies", Erikoiskielet ja käännösteoria, 27, pp.9~22 (2001)
- Holmes, J.S., "The name and nature of translation studies in : The translation studies reader", pp.172~185 (2000), 3rd International Congress of Applied Linguistics
- Israel, F., "Identité, Altérité, Equivalence La traduction comme relation" (2002), Lettres modernes minard
- Lederer, M., "La traduction aujourd'hui" (1994), Hachette
- Pym, A., "Pour une éthique du traducteur" (1997), Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa & Artois