본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

<노걸대>와 <박통사>

Laoqita and Piaotongshi

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Both Laoqita and Piaotongshi were originally published as textbooks for teaching Hànéryányŭ (漢兒言語), the official language of the Yuán (元) Empire. Each of these textbooks, however, underwent several revision processes as the official language of China changed when a new dynasty came in to rule the empire. During the Ming (明) dynasty, each of them was published as Revised Version to accommodate its official language Nánjīng Guānhuà (南京官話) and then for the Qīnɡ (淸) dynasty as New Annotated Version to suit the Beijing Mandarin. This version of Laoquita was also published as Reprinted Version for teaching standard Běijīng Guānhuà (北京官話). This paper makes claims concerning (1) the date of publication of the original Laoqita and Piaotongshi and (2) their authorship. We first claim that they were published almost the same time around the year of Bingxū (丙戌, 1346) during the period Zhìzhèng (至正) of Yuán. This claim is based on at least two passages in the texts, as follows: (1) Piaotongshi mentions in Lesson 39, entitled “The Goryeo Monk”, that Monk Boheo (步虛) of the Goryeo dynasty gave a sermon in the capital city of Yuán in the year of Bingxū (丙戌) and (2) in Story 105, entitled “Auspicious Day for Returning Home?” (筭卦), Laoqita also has a passage “May you have good fortune in this year of Bingxū (今年交大運丙 戌) that refers to the year of Bingxū (丙戌, 1346). The Original Laqoita also mentions about bǎochāo (寶鈔), a paper money used during the Yuan dynasty, reflecting the market price of Zhìzhèng (至正, 1341-1367) period, especially that of 1355-1368. Second, we claim that both Laoqita and Piaotongshi were written by some official government translators/interpreters of the Goryeo dynasty who were dispatched to the captial city of Yuán and stayed around there for a good portion of time. This claim is simply based on frequent references to persons and affairs related to Goryeo in the texts. Both Laogits and Piaotougshi were, however, textbooks for reading Hànyǔ (漢語), complementing and closely related to each other with interesting contents. Since both of them were used as textbooks for reading Hànyǔ texts, the contents mostly focused on learning Hànyǔ with their main topics covering from the names of Chinese dishes, proverbs, and idiomatic expressions to the ways of finding directions to a hospital, selling and buying things for trade or other daily affairs that might easily occur while living in a foreign city. They were textbooks for learning Hànyǔ as a living language. Laogits and Piaotougshi each aimed at different levels of difficulty in learning Hànyǔ. Laoqita aimed at the elementary level, whereas Piaotongshi was written for the intermediate level. For those who were taking the highest-level state examination for recruiting official interpreters (譯科), for instance, Laoqita provided the material for practicing on primary tests. Piaotongshi, on the other hand, provided intermediate-level practice materials that required more specicialized skills. They were, however, both Hànyǔ (漢語) textbooks for understanding daily life.

Abstract

Both Laoqita and Piaotongshi were originally published as textbooks for teaching Hànéryányŭ (漢兒言語), the official language of the Yuán (元) Empire. Each of these textbooks, however, underwent several revision processes as the official language of China changed when a new dynasty came in to rule the empire. During the Ming (明) dynasty, each of them was published as Revised Version to accommodate its official language Nánjīng Guānhuà (南京官話) and then for the Qīnɡ (淸) dynasty as New Annotated Version to suit the Beijing Mandarin. This version of Laoquita was also published as Reprinted Version for teaching standard Běijīng Guānhuà (北京官話). This paper makes claims concerning (1) the date of publication of the original Laoqita and Piaotongshi and (2) their authorship. We first claim that they were published almost the same time around the year of Bingxū (丙戌, 1346) during the period Zhìzhèng (至正) of Yuán. This claim is based on at least two passages in the texts, as follows: (1) Piaotongshi mentions in Lesson 39, entitled “The Goryeo Monk”, that Monk Boheo (步虛) of the Goryeo dynasty gave a sermon in the capital city of Yuán in the year of Bingxū (丙戌) and (2) in Story 105, entitled “Auspicious Day for Returning Home?” (筭卦), Laoqita also has a passage “May you have good fortune in this year of Bingxū (今年交大運丙 戌) that refers to the year of Bingxū (丙戌, 1346). The Original Laqoita also mentions about bǎochāo (寶鈔), a paper money used during the Yuan dynasty, reflecting the market price of Zhìzhèng (至正, 1341-1367) period, especially that of 1355-1368. Second, we claim that both Laoqita and Piaotongshi were written by some official government translators/interpreters of the Goryeo dynasty who were dispatched to the captial city of Yuán and stayed around there for a good portion of time. This claim is simply based on frequent references to persons and affairs related to Goryeo in the texts. Both Laogits and Piaotougshi were, however, textbooks for reading Hànyǔ (漢語), complementing and closely related to each other with interesting contents. Since both of them were used as textbooks for reading Hànyǔ texts, the contents mostly focused on learning Hànyǔ with their main topics covering from the names of Chinese dishes, proverbs, and idiomatic expressions to the ways of finding directions to a hospital, selling and buying things for trade or other daily affairs that might easily occur while living in a foreign city. They were textbooks for learning Hànyǔ as a living language. Laogits and Piaotougshi each aimed at different levels of difficulty in learning Hànyǔ. Laoqita aimed at the elementary level, whereas Piaotongshi was written for the intermediate level. For those who were taking the highest-level state examination for recruiting official interpreters (譯科), for instance, Laoqita provided the material for practicing on primary tests. Piaotongshi, on the other hand, provided intermediate-level practice materials that required more specicialized skills. They were, however, both Hànyǔ (漢語) textbooks for understanding daily life.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. "原本<老乞大>", ~
  2. "刪改<老乞大>", ~
  3. "老乞大新釋", ~
  4. "重刊老乞大", ~
  5. "刪改<朴通事>", ~
  6. "朴通事新釋", ~
  7. "飜譯<老乞大>", ~
  8. "老乞大諺解", ~
  9. "新釋老乞大諺解 上", ~
  10. "重刊老乞大諺解", ~
  11. "飜譯<朴通事> 上", ~
  12. "朴通事諺解", ~
  13. "新釋朴通事諺解", ~
  14. "通文館志", ~
  15. "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
  16. 朴在淵, "交點 <老乞大><박통사> 原文諺解 比較 資料" (2003), 鮮文大學校 中韓飜譯文獻 硏究所
  17. 梁伍鎭, "朴通事 製作年代 小攷", 한국어학, 2 (1995)
  18. 梁伍鎭, "老乞大 朴通事 研究-漢語文에 보이는 語彙와 文法의 特徴을 中心으로-", 박사, pp.1998
  19. 劉昌惇, "朴通事考究", 인문과학, 5 (1960)
  20. 鄭光, "原刊老乞大硏究" (1998), 外語敎學与硏究出版社
  21. 鄭光, "元代 漢語 <老乞大>--신발굴 역학서 자료 <구본노걸대>의한어를 중심으로--", 국어학, 33 (1999)
  22. 鄭光, "老朴集覽譯註" (2011), 태학사
  23. 정승혜, "≪朴通事≫에 반영된 물가와 경제 -刪改本의 화폐 단위를 중심으로-", 어문논집, (60), pp.156~187 (2009), 민족어문학회
  24. 정광, "최세진 연구 1-老乞大ㆍ朴通事의 飜訳을 중심으로-", 덕성여대논문집, 10 (1977)
  25. 정광, "朝鮮朝訳科漢学과 漢学書 -英ㆍ正祖代 訳科漢学試券을 중심으로", 震檀 学報, 63 (1987)
  26. 정광, "訳学書의 刊板에 대하여", 周時経学報, 4 (1989)
  27. 정광, "元代漢語の<旧本老乞大>", 中国語研究 開篇, 19, pp.1~23 (1999)
  28. 정광, "訳学書研究の諸問題", 朝鮮学報, 170 (1999)
  29. 정광, "新発見<老乞大>について", 日本大阪市立大学文学部 中国学ㆍ朝鮮学教室 招請 講演 (1999)
  30. 정광, "최세진 生涯의 研究에 대한 再考와 反省", 語文研究, 28(1)통권 : 105, pp.49~61 (2000)
  31. 정광, "<老朴集覧>과 <老乞大>ㆍ<朴通事>의 旧本", 震檀学報, pp.89~ (2000)
  32. 鄭光, "山氣文庫 소장 {刪改}<老乞大>에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 35(1), pp.7~30 (2007), 한국어문교육연구회
  33. 정광, "漢語 敎材 ≪노걸대≫의 장면 분석", 國語學, (49), pp.225~252 (2007), 국어학회
  34. 정광, "고려본 <용감수경>에 대하여", <龍龕手鏡>에 대한 국제워크숍 (2012)
  35. 정광, "<월인석보>의 舊卷과 훈민정음의 언해본-正統 12년 佛日寺板 <월인석보> 玉冊을 중심으로-", 國語學, (68), pp.3~49 (2013), 국어학회
  36. 정광, "司訳院 倭学 研究" (1988), 太学社
  37. 정광, "朝鮮朝 訳科 試券 研究" (1990), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
  38. 정광, "原刊老乞大硏究" (2000), 外語敎學与硏究出版社
  39. 정광, "譯學書 硏究" (2002), J & C
  40. 정광, "역주 原本老乞大" (2004), 김영사
  41. 정광, "역주 번역노걸대와 노걸대언해" (2006), 신구문화사
  42. 정광, "역주 원본노걸대" (2010), 박문사
  43. 小倉進平, "增訂朝鮮語學史" (1940), 刀江書院
  44. 金文京, "老乞大-朝鮮中世の中國語會話讀本-" (2002), 平凡社
  45. 船田善之, "元代史料としての舊本<老乞大> -鈔と物價の記載を中心として-", 東 洋學報, 83(1), pp.1~30 (2001)
  46. 古屋昭弘, "「官話」と「南京」についてのメモ-「近代官話音系國際學術硏討會」に參加し て-", 中國語學硏究 開篇, 25, pp.119~123 (2006)
  47. 前田直典, "元朝史の硏究" (1973), 東京大學出版會
  48. Courant, M., "Bibliographie Corèenne; Tableau littèraire de la Corèe contenant la nomenclature des ouvrages publiès dans ce pays jusqu'en 1890, ainsi que la description et l'annalyse dètaillèes des principaux d'entre ces ouvrages. 3 vols" (1894)
  49. Courant, M., "Supplèment à la bibliographie Corèenne.(Jusqu'en 1899). 1 vol" (1901)
  50. Dyer, Svetlana Rimsky-Korsakoffr, "Structural Analysis of Lao Ch'i-ta", Ph. D., pp.1979
  51. Dyer, Svetlana Rimsky-Korsakoffr, "Grammatical Analysis of the Lao Ch'i-ta" (1983), Australian National University
  52. Dyer, Svetlana Rimsky-Korsakoffr, "Pak the Interpreter - an annotated translation and literary-cultural evaluation of the Piao Tongshi of 1677" (2005), Pandanus Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)