≪老乞大≫에 나타난 漢兒言語에 대하여
A Study on the Han’eryanyu reflected in Laoqida
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Laoqida(老乞大) were very popular Mandarin textbooks that had been in use at latest before the fifteenth century and their revised versions, each with slight revisions, were published; therefore, they also constitute very valuable historical data for the study of the Chinese language. This paper primarily attempts to investigate the Modern Chinese characteristics reflected in Laoqida(老乞大). The content of Jiulao(舊老) suggests that they have been written at the time of the Yuan Dynasty and that the language of Jiulao(舊老), Fanlao(飜老), Fanpiao(飜朴) reflect the Chinese characteristics in the period of Yuan Dynasty. In this period, groups of speakers of Chinese and Altaic languages came into contact, there were several changes in the lexical system and syntactic structure of Modern Chinese. This Chinese characteristics is called a Han’eryanyu(漢兒言語). In the other versions published in the 18th century, this characteristics had all vanished. For scholars investigating the interaction between Modern Chinese and Altaic languages, Laoqida(老乞大) provide important information about what the language was like at that time.
Abstract
Laoqida(老乞大) were very popular Mandarin textbooks that had been in use at latest before the fifteenth century and their revised versions, each with slight revisions, were published; therefore, they also constitute very valuable historical data for the study of the Chinese language. This paper primarily attempts to investigate the Modern Chinese characteristics reflected in Laoqida(老乞大). The content of Jiulao(舊老) suggests that they have been written at the time of the Yuan Dynasty and that the language of Jiulao(舊老), Fanlao(飜老), Fanpiao(飜朴) reflect the Chinese characteristics in the period of Yuan Dynasty. In this period, groups of speakers of Chinese and Altaic languages came into contact, there were several changes in the lexical system and syntactic structure of Modern Chinese. This Chinese characteristics is called a Han’eryanyu(漢兒言語). In the other versions published in the 18th century, this characteristics had all vanished. For scholars investigating the interaction between Modern Chinese and Altaic languages, Laoqida(老乞大) provide important information about what the language was like at that time.
참고문헌 (68)
- 閔泳珪, "老乞大辯疑", 人文科學, 12, pp.201~209 (1964), 延世大學校 人文科學硏究所
- 박영록, "≪元朝秘史≫ 언어특징 연구", 중국언어연구, (19), pp.273~310 (2004), 한국중국언어학회
- 신용권, "≪老乞大≫에 나타난 後置詞에 대하여", 중국어문학, (42) (2003), 영남중국어문학회
- 신용권, "<노걸대>가 반영하는 한어의 성격에 대하여", 중국어문학, 48(48), pp.537~572 (2006), 영남중국어문학회
- 愼鏞權, "老乞大,朴通事 諸刊本에 나타난 漢語 문법 변화 연구 ― 漢語의 성격 규명과 文法化 현상을 중심으로 ―", 박사, pp.2007
- 양오진, "老乞大ㆍ朴通事의 漢語文 性格에 대한 硏究", 한국어학, 8, pp.207~236 (1998), 한국어학회
- 梁伍鎭, "초기 漢學書에 보이는 몽고어성분", 중어중문학, 31, pp.75~96 (2002), 한국중어중문학회
- 李丙疇, "老朴集覽考" (1966), 進修堂
- 정광, "原本노걸대" (2004), 김영사
- 정광, "元代 漢語"老乞大", 國語學, 33, pp.3~68 (1999), 國語學會.
- 陳治文, "元代有指物名詞加"每"的說法", 中國語文, 1, pp.71~72 (1988)
- 額爾登泰, "蒙古秘史 In: 詞匯選釋" (1980), 內蒙古人民出版社
- 方齡貴, "元明戱曲中的蒙古語" (1991), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 馮春田, "近代漢語語法硏究" (2000), 山東敎育出版社
- 江藍生, "說"麽"與"們"同源", 中國語文, 3, pp.180~190 (1995)
- 江藍生, "後置詞"行"考辨", 語文硏究, 1, pp.1~10 (1998)
- 李崇興, "元代直譯體公文的 語基礎", 語言硏究, 2, pp.65~70 (2001)
- 李泰洙, "古本、諺解本≪老乞大≫裏方位詞的特殊功能", 語文硏究, 2, pp.30~38 (2000)
- 李泰洙, "古本≪老乞大≫的語助詞“有”", 語言敎學與硏究, 3, pp.77~80 (2000)
- 李泰洙, "≪老乞大≫四種版本語言硏究" (2003), 語文出版社
- 李泰洙, "≪老乞大≫語序硏究", 語言硏究, 3, pp.71~82 (2000)
- 梁伍鎭, "論元代漢語"老乞大"的語言特點", 中國言語硏究, 10, pp.145~174 (2000), 韓國中國言語學會
- 林燾, "北京官話溯源", 中國語文, 3, pp.161~169 (1987)
- 呂叔湘, "漢語語法論文集(增訂本)" (1984), 商務印書館
- 呂叔湘, "近代漢語指代詞" (1985), 學林出版社
- 梅祖麟, "從語言史看幾本元雜劇賓白的寫作時期", 言學論叢, 13, pp.111~153 (1984), 商務印書館
- 梅祖麟, "關于近代漢語指代詞―讀呂著"近代漢語指代詞"", 中國語文, 6, pp.401~412 (1986)
- 孫錫信, "元代指物名詞後加"們(每)"的由來", 中國語文, 4, pp.302~303 (1990)
- 江藍生, "太田辰夫 In: 漢語史通考(日文原版: 1988)" (1991), 重慶出版社
- 譚新生, "北京通史簡編" (2004), 南開大學出版社
- 汪化云, "漢語方言指示代詞三分現象初探", 語言硏究, 2, pp.8~14 (2002)
- 王力, "漢語語法史" (1989), 商務印書館
- 王霞, ""老乞大"四版本詞匯硏究", 박사, pp.2002
- 楊聯陞, "老乞大ㆍ 朴通事裏的語法語彙", 東方學誌, 3, pp.3~15 (1957), 延世大學校
- 楊天戈, "說"兀"", 中國語文, 5, pp.363~367 (1980)
- 兪光中, "近代漢語語法硏究" (1999), 學林出版社
- 余志鴻, "元代漢語"-行"的語法意義", 語文硏究, 2, pp.16~20 (1987)
- 余志鴻, ""蒙古秘史"的特殊語法―論元代漢語的時體制", 語言硏究, 1, pp.29~41 (1988)
- 余志鴻, ""蒙古秘史"的特殊語法―OV型和POS結構", 語言硏究, 2, pp.51~57 (1992)
- 余志鴻, "元代漢語的後置詞系統", 近代漢語硏究, 二, pp.297~313 (1999), 商務印書館
- 袁賓, "近代漢語槪論" (1992), 上海敎育出版社
- 祖生利, "元代白話碑文中方位詞的格標記作用", 語言硏究, 4, pp.62~75 (2001)
- 祖生利, "近代漢語"們"綴硏究綜述", 古漢語硏究, 4, pp.49~55 (2005)
- 小澤重男, "元朝秘史蒙古語文法講義" (1993), 風間書房
- 小澤重男, "元朝秘史" (1994), 岩波書店
- 服部四郎, "元朝秘史の蒙古語を表はす漢字の硏究" (1946), 龍文書局
- Poppe, N., "Grammar of Written Mongolian" (1954), Otto Harrassowitz
- "元朝秘史(明 洪武年間)三種" (1975), 中文出版社
- "舊刊老乞大 In: 原本老乞大" (2002), 外語敎學與硏究出版社
- "飜譯老乞大(1517年이전) 卷上, 中央大學校出版部 影印本" (1973)
- "飜譯老乞大 (1517年이전) 卷下, 仁荷大學校人文科學硏究所 影印本" (1975)
- "飜譯老乞大(1517年이전) 卷上下, 亞細亞文化社 影印本" (1980)
- "飜譯朴通事(1517年이전) 卷上, 慶北大學校大學院 影印本" (1959)
- "老乞大諺解(1670年), 서울大學校 奎章閣 影印本" (2003)
- "朴通事諺解(1677年), 서울大學校 奎章閣 影印本" (2004)
- "老乞大諺解(平安監營重刊本)1945年序, 서울大學校 奎章閣 影印本" (2003)
- "老乞大新釋(1761年序), 서울大學校 奎章閣 所藏本(奎4871)"
- "老乞大新釋諺解(1763年) 卷一(零本), 미국 컬럼비아대학 東亞圖書館 所藏本"
- "朴通事新釋諺解(1765年), 서울大學校 奎章閣 影印本" (2004)
- "重刊老乞大(1795年), 서울大學校 奎章閣 所藏本≪古3917-1≫"
- "重刊老乞大諺解(1795年이후), 서울大學校 奎章閣 所藏本≪奎2049≫"
- 譚其驤主, "中國歷史地圖集(元ㆍ明時期)" (1982), 中國地圖出版社
- 龍潜庵, "宋元語言詞典" (1985), 上海辭書出版社
- 黃伯榮主, "漢語方言語法類編" (1996), 靑島出版社
- "漢語大詞典(縮印本)" (1997), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 江藍生, "唐五代語言詞典" (1997), 上海敎育出版社
- 袁賓, "宋語言詞典" (1997), 上海敎育出版社
- 李崇興, "元語言詞典" (1998), 上海敎育出版社