중국어 문장 부호 ‘파절호’ 연구
A Punctuation Mark Study on the Chinese Sentence: With Reference to ‘em dash’
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research explores the appropriate use of ‘em-dash’ or ‘long dash’ among Chinese to Korean or Korean to Chinese learners. As an indicator of punctuation use, it has a few roles in sentence. The main function is to indicate annotations, supplementary explanations, or word meaning changes. Dependent on the perspective, this research also analyzes its appropriate functions in use. The analysis demonstrates that the ‘em-dash’ is one of the most error-prone punctuation marks in translation. The misuses or errors can be classified into two cases: One is that translators do not put the mark wherein it should be employed or vice versa. There were many errors in using brackets where brackets should be used to indicate annotations or supplementary explanations. Basically, the functions of the two are similar; however, they differ in usage. This implies that translators should pay attention to the accurate usage in translation. In addition, Chinese learners should fully understand the classification of usage for ‘em-dash’, ‘colon’ and the ‘ellipse. Due to these differences, they should employ an appropriate translation strategy in translation between Korean and Chinese. For example, the low frequency of ‘em-dash’ in Korean should be appropriately employed of the fulfillment for naturalness in translation. Conversely, the mark should be appropriately inserted when transferring Chinese to Korean. The findings put forward that Korean Chinese learners should be aware of the function and usage of the mark for more accurate natural translation.
Abstract
This research explores the appropriate use of ‘em-dash’ or ‘long dash’ among Chinese to Korean or Korean to Chinese learners. As an indicator of punctuation use, it has a few roles in sentence. The main function is to indicate annotations, supplementary explanations, or word meaning changes. Dependent on the perspective, this research also analyzes its appropriate functions in use. The analysis demonstrates that the ‘em-dash’ is one of the most error-prone punctuation marks in translation. The misuses or errors can be classified into two cases: One is that translators do not put the mark wherein it should be employed or vice versa. There were many errors in using brackets where brackets should be used to indicate annotations or supplementary explanations. Basically, the functions of the two are similar; however, they differ in usage. This implies that translators should pay attention to the accurate usage in translation. In addition, Chinese learners should fully understand the classification of usage for ‘em-dash’, ‘colon’ and the ‘ellipse. Due to these differences, they should employ an appropriate translation strategy in translation between Korean and Chinese. For example, the low frequency of ‘em-dash’ in Korean should be appropriately employed of the fulfillment for naturalness in translation. Conversely, the mark should be appropriately inserted when transferring Chinese to Korean. The findings put forward that Korean Chinese learners should be aware of the function and usage of the mark for more accurate natural translation.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김도훈, "영어와 한국어 문장부호의 비교 연구—Colon(쌍점)과 Dash(줄표)를 중심으로", 영어영문학21, 23(1), pp.147~176 (2010), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "중국어와 한국어의 문장 부호 비교 - 모호와 쌍점을 중심으로", 인문학연구, 59(3), pp.269~297 (2020), 인문과학연구소
- 김미경, "중국어와 한국어의 문장 부호 규정 비교 - 두호와 돈호 vs 쉼표", 인문언어, 22(2), pp.101~134 (2020), 국제언어인문학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "중국과 타이완의 문장 부호 비교 - 문장 부호 규정의 성립 과정과 분화", 인문언어, 23(2), pp.145~176 (2021), 국제언어인문학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "중국과 대만의 인호 비교 연구", 人文科學硏究, 45, pp.289~318 (2022), 인문과학연구소
- 김아영, "한국어 기사문의 인용부호 사용과 중국어 번역 고찰", 중국학, (70), pp.233~256 (2020), 대한중국학회[DOI]
- 유준방, "中韩标点符号对比", 중국학연구, (74), pp.119~144 (2015), 중국학연구회
- 장기, "한중 문장부호 대조 및 번역 전략 고찰", 통번역교육연구, 9(2), pp.179~219 (2011), 한국통번역교육학회
- 장림, "한중 신문기사 번역텍스트에 나타난 문제점 : 〈조선일보〉 포털사이트 중문판을 중심으로", 석사, 통번역학과, pp.2014
- 전기정, "한중 문장부호 대조 분석", 중국어문학논집, (46), pp.353~375 (2007), 중국어문학연구회
- 진현, "마침표와 쉼표의 한중 대조 분석", 통번역학연구, 17(1), pp.307~334 (2013), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 진현, "쌍점(:)과 쌍반점(;)의 한중 대조분석", 통번역학연구, 17(4), pp.197~215 (2013), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 진현, "중국어문학 논문 문장 부호 오류 분석 －따옴표, 쉼표, 낫표, 화살괄호를 중심으로－", 중국어문학, (75), pp.205~223 (2017), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
- 황은하, "말뭉치에 기반한 한중 뉴스표제의 문장부호 번역 연구", 번역학연구, 14(2), pp.283~311 (2013), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 教育部语言文字信息管理司, "标点符号用法 解读" (2012), 语文出版社
- 兰宾汉, "新国标标点符号使用手册" (2014), 中华书局
- 吕朝阳, "破折号与冒号的区别", 中学语文教学参考, (07), pp.57~ (1999)
- 李弗不, "同是解说或总结 冒号、破折号有区别——谈冒号与破折号的区分", 作文与考试, (06), pp.48~49 (2018)
- 李正莉, "破折号用法简化研究", 新闻研究导刊, (22), pp.199~202 (2021)
- 林穗芳, "标点符号学习与应用" (2000), 人民出版社
- 马烽, "结婚", 人民日报, ~ (1951)
- 薛一德, "破折号和括号同为标示注释或补充说明有何区别", 咬文嚼字, (02), pp.52~53 (2013)
- 邵敬敏, "标点符号要诀" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 苏培成, "怎样使用标点符号" (2017), 北京出版社
- 苏培成, "破折号与连接号的分野", 语文建设, (02), pp.21~22 (2000)
- 杨权, "出版物标点符号用法规范" (2007), 重庆出版社
- 于建波, "破折号和省略号的“摹声”功能", 语文教学与研究, (17), pp.50~ (2002)
- 郁达夫, "徐瀛插图郁达夫小说全集" (2015), 春风文艺出版社
- 游艳茜, "高中生作文标点符号使用情况调查研究", 硕士, pp.2022
- 曹雪芹, "红楼梦" (2000), 时代文艺出版社
- 曹禺, "雷雨" (1994), 人民文学出版社
- 左英, "括号”与“破折号", 语文天地, (22), pp.21~ (2002)
- 彭静雯, "基于语料库的中高级汉语水平韩国学生标点符号使用偏误分析", 硕士, pp.2014
- 好作文编辑部, "破折号与冒号的区别", 好作文, (10), pp.57~58 (2020)
- 胡萩梣, "戰後跨語壹代詩人作品之標點符號研究", 碩士, pp.2012
- "标点符号用法 (GB", T 15834-2011), 中国国家标准化管理委员会, pp.2011, ~
- "한글 맞춤법 . 문화체육관광부고시 제2017-12호", ~ (2017)
- "문장 부호 해설", 국립국어원(2014-01-44), ~ (2014)