번역 대본과 번역자: 『새한글성경』 유다서 1:5b 번역
Vorlage of Translation and Translator: On the Translation of NKT’s Jude 1:5b
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis deals with a theme of relationship between translator and his/her Vorlage for translation referring to the translation of Jude 1:5b of NKT. In NA28, the Vorlage of Jude 1:5b of NKT, Iesous, is mentioned as the subject in relation to the Exodus. However, in NA27, kyrios appeared as the subject, so translators could apply it literally, because it is common knowledge that “Jesus” or “Joshua” was not the guide of the Exodus. The difficulties of this Vorlage were reflected in NKT. In other words, the translator did not translate this part as “Jesus” or “Joshua” faithfully in NA28, but translated into “God made Joshua doing”. Based on the Vorlage, this translation is a complete mistranslation. Furthermore, the translation is virtually unfounded in that it does not have any variant readings. Furthermore, contrary to ECM’s suggestion, it did not follow the argument that kyrios is closer to the original reading than Iesous. This problem occurred when a text that the translator disagreed with was presented even though he/she tried to be faithful to the Vorlage. In this case, the translator has to choose one way of the two. In other words, even if the translator cannot agree with the Vorlage, he/she will faithfully translate it according to the translation principle and explain the difficulty of the Vorlage in some footnotes, or a more appropriate reading is suggested through evaluating of the Vorlage’ variant readings The translation of Jude 1:5b in NKT is a disappointing one in this regard. Nevertheless, this provides an excellent opportunity to think deeply about the relationship between the Vorlage and the translator in the future.
Abstract
This thesis deals with a theme of relationship between translator and his/her Vorlage for translation referring to the translation of Jude 1:5b of NKT. In NA28, the Vorlage of Jude 1:5b of NKT, Iesous, is mentioned as the subject in relation to the Exodus. However, in NA27, kyrios appeared as the subject, so translators could apply it literally, because it is common knowledge that “Jesus” or “Joshua” was not the guide of the Exodus. The difficulties of this Vorlage were reflected in NKT. In other words, the translator did not translate this part as “Jesus” or “Joshua” faithfully in NA28, but translated into “God made Joshua doing”. Based on the Vorlage, this translation is a complete mistranslation. Furthermore, the translation is virtually unfounded in that it does not have any variant readings. Furthermore, contrary to ECM’s suggestion, it did not follow the argument that kyrios is closer to the original reading than Iesous. This problem occurred when a text that the translator disagreed with was presented even though he/she tried to be faithful to the Vorlage. In this case, the translator has to choose one way of the two. In other words, even if the translator cannot agree with the Vorlage, he/she will faithfully translate it according to the translation principle and explain the difficulty of the Vorlage in some footnotes, or a more appropriate reading is suggested through evaluating of the Vorlage’ variant readings The translation of Jude 1:5b in NKT is a disappointing one in this regard. Nevertheless, this provides an excellent opportunity to think deeply about the relationship between the Vorlage and the translator in the future.
참고문헌 (26)
- 대한성서공회, "공동번역 성서" (1977), 대한성서공회
- 대한성서공회, "성경전서 표준새번역" (1993), 대한성서공회
- 대한성서공회, "성경전서 개역개정판" (2005), 대한성서공회
- 대한성서공회, "새한글성경 : 신약과 시편" (2021), 대한성서공회
- Aland, B, "Nestle-Aland: Novum Testamentum Graece" (1993), Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft
- Aland, B, "Nestle-Aland: Novum Testamentum Graece" (2012), Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft
- Catholic Letters, "The Institute for New Testament Textual Research. Vol. 4: Die katholischen Briefe", pp.2013, Aland, B
- 김주한, "NA28판에 대한 비평적 고찰: 공동서신을 중심으로", 성경과 신학, 80, pp.241~309 (2016), 한국복음주의신학회
- 김주한, "『새한글성경』 신약성경에 관한 고찰", 신약연구, 20(4), pp.729~768 (2021), 한국복음주의신약학회[DOI]
- 김주한, "『새한글성경』 사도행전 번역과 방향성: 헬라어 대본의 변경 가능성과 준비", 개혁논총, 60, pp.43~76 (2022), 개혁신학회
- 민현식, "『새한글성경 신약과 시편』의 국어학적 의의", 성경원문연구, (51), pp.353~384 (2022), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
- 안창선, "『새한글성경 신약과 시편』 번역에 관한 제언 — 요한복음에 나타나는 독특한 표현들을 중심으로 —", 성경원문연구, (51), pp.304~326 (2022), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
- 양기찬, "번역, 현상과 실제: 번역의 실질적 가치", 인문언어, 22(1), pp.35~54 (2020), 국제언어인문학회[DOI]
- 이두희, "『새한글성경』의 번역 배경과 주요 특징 — 신약을 중심으로 —", 성경원문연구, (51), pp.224~251 (2022), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
- 장동수, "『세계성서공회연합회 그리스어 신약전서』 5판의 본문 변화들에 대한 연구", 성경원문연구, (39), pp.266~287 (2016), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
- 조재천, "『새한글성경 신약과 시편』은 원문에 얼마나 가까워졌는가? — 누가복음을 중심으로 —", 성경원문연구, (51), pp.280~303 (2022), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
- 조재천, "새로운 사도행전 본문 - 네스틀레-알란트 28판과 대비평본의 차이점들", 신약논단, 29(2), pp.113~156 (2022), 한국신약학회[DOI]
- Bauckham, Richard J., "유다서·베드로후서" (2010), 솔로몬
- Comfort, Philip W., "New Testament Text and Translation Commentary" (2008), Tyndale House Publishers
- Comfort, Philip W, "A Commentary on the Manuscript and Text of the New Testament" (2015), Kregel
- Elliott, J. Keith, "A New Edition offNestle-Aland, Greek New Testament", JTS, 64(1), pp.47~65 (2012)
- Frey, Jörg, "The Letter of Jude and the Second Letter of Peter" (2018), Baylor University Press
- Metzger, Bruce M, "A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament" (1998), Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft
- Trobisch, David, "네스틀레-알란트 28판 헬라어 신약성경 사용자 가이드" (2016), 솔로몬
- Wasserman, Tommy, "A New Approach to Textual Criticism: An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method" (2017), Deutsche Biblegesellschaft