본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동순위 혈족상속인 전원의 상속포기와 배우자상속 - 대법원 2015.5.14. 선고 2013다48852 판결을 중심으로 -

The Inheritance of Spouse when all the Blood Relatives in same order give up the Inheritance

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Supreme Court of Korea recently ruled that in case which all the Children of the Inheritee gave up their Inheritance, a Spouse and Grandchildren of a Inheritee should be joint heirs(2013da48852). This Conclusion was based on the Idea that the one who gave up the Inheritance are regarded as non-heir ab initio. However, it could be changed considering the letter of Korean Civil Code(KCC) Article 1043 which provides that in cases of two or more inheritors are exist and one of them has effected a renunciation of inheritance, his share of the inheritance shall revert to the other inheritors in proportion to their respective shares thereof. It is common to interpret “the other inheritors” of KCC Art.1043 as including a spouse of inheritance. Therefore, it could be read that the inheritance is provided to the Spouse solely when all the Children of an Inheritee gave up their Inheritance. The Conventional Wisdom is also in line with the Judgment. It would be reasonable because the Subject to the Renunciation of Inheritance is not just inherited property, but Position as Inheritor(Heirship). Nevertheless, This does need to be carefully considered to avoid having an undue Effect on the Inheritance Rights of Spouse. The Share of Spouse's Inheritance is closely connected to that of Blood Relative’s in Civil Law of Korea unlike to that of Japan. Therefore, if Blood Relatives abused the Renunciation System of Inheritance, Inheritance Rights of a Spouse would be significantly weakened. Furthermore, according to this Supreme court's decision, Debts are passed from generation to generation without taking into consideration of interested parties’ Intentions. In conclusion, a Spouse becomes sole inheritor when all the Blood Relatives of Inheritee in same order give up the Inheritance. In theory, it might be worth for consideration to grant Art.1043 Special Provision Status against Art.1000 or Art.1003.

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Korea recently ruled that in case which all the Children of the Inheritee gave up their Inheritance, a Spouse and Grandchildren of a Inheritee should be joint heirs(2013da48852). This Conclusion was based on the Idea that the one who gave up the Inheritance are regarded as non-heir ab initio. However, it could be changed considering the letter of Korean Civil Code(KCC) Article 1043 which provides that in cases of two or more inheritors are exist and one of them has effected a renunciation of inheritance, his share of the inheritance shall revert to the other inheritors in proportion to their respective shares thereof. It is common to interpret “the other inheritors” of KCC Art.1043 as including a spouse of inheritance. Therefore, it could be read that the inheritance is provided to the Spouse solely when all the Children of an Inheritee gave up their Inheritance. The Conventional Wisdom is also in line with the Judgment. It would be reasonable because the Subject to the Renunciation of Inheritance is not just inherited property, but Position as Inheritor(Heirship). Nevertheless, This does need to be carefully considered to avoid having an undue Effect on the Inheritance Rights of Spouse. The Share of Spouse's Inheritance is closely connected to that of Blood Relative’s in Civil Law of Korea unlike to that of Japan. Therefore, if Blood Relatives abused the Renunciation System of Inheritance, Inheritance Rights of a Spouse would be significantly weakened. Furthermore, according to this Supreme court's decision, Debts are passed from generation to generation without taking into consideration of interested parties’ Intentions. In conclusion, a Spouse becomes sole inheritor when all the Blood Relatives of Inheritee in same order give up the Inheritance. In theory, it might be worth for consideration to grant Art.1043 Special Provision Status against Art.1000 or Art.1003.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004), 박영사
  2. 權純漢, "배우자상속제도에 관한 비교법적 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.1993
  3. 김상용, "피상속인의 자녀가 모두 상속포기를 한 경우 손자녀가 상속인이 되어 상속채무를 승계하는가", 법률신문, ~ (2015)
  4. 김용한, "신친족상속법론" (2002), 박영사
  5. 김인유, "상속포기자의 특별연고자 지위에 관한 연구", 법학논고, (39), pp.227~250 (2012), 법학연구원[DOI]
  6. 김상용, "친족상속법" (2013), 법문사
  7. 류일현, "상속포기에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과 민사법전공, pp.2013
  8. 박근웅, "상속의 포기와 채권자취소권", 법학연구, 21(3), pp.349~381 (2011), 법학연구원
  9. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 박영사
  10. 박병호, "가족법" (1991), 한국방송대학교 출판부
  11. 이경희, "가족법" (2013), 法元社
  12. 이근식, "신친족상속법" (1978), 일조각
  13. 이영무, "선순위 상속인들이 상속을 포기하였을 경우 상속재산이 차순위 상속인에게 귀속되는지 여부에 관하여", 인권과 정의, (239) (1996), 대한변호사협회
  14. 이화숙, "가족, 사회와 가족법" (2012), 세창출판사
  15. 정광현, "신친족상속법요론" (1959), 법문사
  16. 최진섭, "상속포기의 법리", 가족법연구, (9) (1995), 한국가족법학회
  17. 백승흠, "가족법" (2013), 三英社
  18. 谷口知平, "新版注釈民法(27), 相続(2)" (1989), 有斐閣
  19. 金山正信, "家族法大系Ⅶ, 相續(2)" (1960), 有斐閣
  20. 內田貴, "民法Ⅵ(親族·相續)" (2009), 東京大學出版會
  21. 山主政幸, "民法の一部改正について", 法律時報, 34(7)통권 : 392 (1962), 日本評論社
  22. 星野英一, "最高裁判所民事判例硏究 52", 法学協会雑誌, 85(5) (1968), 有斐閣
  23. 我妻榮, "親族·相續法解說" (1949), 日本評論社
  24. 我妻榮, "親族法·相續法" (1961), 日本評論新社
  25. 阿川淸道, "民法の一部を改正する法律", 法律時報, 34(6)통권 : 391 (1962), 日本評論社
  26. 柚木馨, "判例相續法論" (1953), 有斐閣
  27. 有地亨, "民法939条施行当時の相続放棄者の相続分", 民商法雜誌, 57(6) (1968), 弘文堂書房
  28. 中川善之助, "註釋相續法(上)" (1955), 有斐閣
  29. 中川善之助, "相續法" (2000), 有斐閣

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)