조부모와 계부모 기타 친족의 면접교섭권: 해석론과 입법론
Visitation Rights of Grandparent, Step-parent and Other Relatives: Through Interpretation or Legislation?
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Every person has a right to contact and hold a social intercourse with whom he/she want to. Especially a right to access and communicate with a member of family is guaranteed by the Constitution. But it is not easy to continue the relationship when the family is broken up on divorce or death. Ironically it is the very and urgent time that children need an intimate relationship, so that visitation of grandparents, step-parents, brothers and sisters and other relatives is useful for the children who are in emotionally vulnerable states due to a loss of parents. Nevertheless, the Korean Civil Law does not have any provisions on the visitation right of the person other than parents. Some argue the visitation rights of grandparent etc. can be recognized by the interpretation of the existing provisions, but such a theory is inevitable to face a limitation because it results to infringe the parental rights. Therefore I suggest a new legislation about visitation rights of grandparent etc. should be enacted, and review some relevant issues in this article, for example, who can allege the rights, under what requisition the rights are established and when it should be excluded or limited.
Abstract
Every person has a right to contact and hold a social intercourse with whom he/she want to. Especially a right to access and communicate with a member of family is guaranteed by the Constitution. But it is not easy to continue the relationship when the family is broken up on divorce or death. Ironically it is the very and urgent time that children need an intimate relationship, so that visitation of grandparents, step-parents, brothers and sisters and other relatives is useful for the children who are in emotionally vulnerable states due to a loss of parents. Nevertheless, the Korean Civil Law does not have any provisions on the visitation right of the person other than parents. Some argue the visitation rights of grandparent etc. can be recognized by the interpretation of the existing provisions, but such a theory is inevitable to face a limitation because it results to infringe the parental rights. Therefore I suggest a new legislation about visitation rights of grandparent etc. should be enacted, and review some relevant issues in this article, for example, who can allege the rights, under what requisition the rights are established and when it should be excluded or limited.
참고문헌 (27)
- 權純漢, "親族·相續法" (2013), 도서출판 피데스
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2013), 法文社
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 博英社
- 申榮鎬, "로스쿨 가족법강의" (2013), 세창출판사
- 양수산, "親族相續法" (1998), 韓國外國語大學校 出版部
- 오시영, "親族相續法" (2011), 학현사
- 이영규, "(새로운)가족법 강의" (2008), 大明出版社
- 석광현, "주해친족법 제1권과 제2권" (2015), 박영사
- 곽민희, "프랑스법상 조부모의 방문권(droit de visite)", 가족법연구, 27(3), pp.177~208 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 具然昌, "親權制度의 再照明", 家族法硏究, (4) (1990)
- 金相瑢, "面接交涉權", 釜山大學校 法學硏究, 40(1) (1999)
- 김수정, "자녀의 최선의 이익과 면접교섭권", 가족법연구, 19(1), pp.309~347 (2005), 한국가족법학회
- 김은아, "재혼가족의 친족법적 과제", 가족법연구, 24(3), pp.75~98 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 閔裕淑, "離婚한 夫婦사이의 子에 대한 面接交涉權의 考", 法曹, 47(7) (1992)
- 魚寅義, "面接交涉權에 관한 考察", 청주법학, 7 (1993)
- 윤부찬, "조부모의 면접교섭권에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (38), pp.499~538 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 이현재, "의붓부모의 방문권과 당사자 적격-미국을 중심으로-", 民事法硏究, 12(1) (2004)
- 진민희, "조부모의 면접교섭권", 사법, 1(10), pp.131~167 (2009), 사법발전재단
- 崔達坤, "離婚 後의 子女保護", 家族法硏究, (10) (1996)
- 최진섭, "형제자매관계의 민법상 의의", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.373~398 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- Fernández, Patricia S., "Grandparent Access: A Model Statute", Yale L. & Pol’y Rev, 6, pp.109~ (1988)
- Goldberg, Michael K., "A Survey of the Fifty States’ Grandparent Visitation Statutes", Marq. Elder’s Advisor, 10, pp.248~ (2009)
- Henry Sapp, Terra L., "Comment, Grandparent Visitation Statutes In the Aftermath of Troxel v. Granville", J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law, 17, pp.121~ (2001)
- Dethloff, Nina, "Familienrecht" (2012)
- Gernhuber, "Familienrecht" (2006)
- Muscheler, Karlheinz, "Familienrecht" (2013)
- Schwab, Dieter, "Familienrecht" (2013)