Modified Feature Specifications w.r.t. Anaphoric Dependency
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze existing Agree-based mechanisms such as feature checking by Chomsky (2001) and feature sharing by P&T (2004, 2007) and to find out the solutions about the anaphoric dependencies, which have long been regarded as a study on semantic, not syntax. As known in (1), anaphor himself must share values with subject DP Tom/he within a given clause whereas pronoun he can be interpreted by meeting matrix subject Tom with identical values. Two types of dependents, anaphor and pronoun depend on which position their antecedents lie in respectively. Besides they have distinguished feature specifications about (un)interpretable or (un)valued features. The former features can make their semantically interpretation possible through their agree relation whereas the latter features allow syntactical derivation to be performed via. feature sharing, or valuation. Noticeably, no features can be deleted throughout the derivation. This paper introduces the modified feature specifications about nominal DPs in the way that P&T (2004, 2007) assign T-/Q-features to Tns and C respectively. Also, anaphoric dependencies can be solved within the syntax, not handing over to LF or PF by adopting Brody (1997), Legate (2003), Zeijlstra (2010) and others.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze existing Agree-based mechanisms such as feature checking by Chomsky (2001) and feature sharing by P&T (2004, 2007) and to find out the solutions about the anaphoric dependencies, which have long been regarded as a study on semantic, not syntax. As known in (1), anaphor himself must share values with subject DP Tom/he within a given clause whereas pronoun he can be interpreted by meeting matrix subject Tom with identical values. Two types of dependents, anaphor and pronoun depend on which position their antecedents lie in respectively. Besides they have distinguished feature specifications about (un)interpretable or (un)valued features. The former features can make their semantically interpretation possible through their agree relation whereas the latter features allow syntactical derivation to be performed via. feature sharing, or valuation. Noticeably, no features can be deleted throughout the derivation. This paper introduces the modified feature specifications about nominal DPs in the way that P&T (2004, 2007) assign T-/Q-features to Tns and C respectively. Also, anaphoric dependencies can be solved within the syntax, not handing over to LF or PF by adopting Brody (1997), Legate (2003), Zeijlstra (2010) and others.
참고문헌 (19)
- Brody, M., "Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax", pp.139~167 (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Frampton, J., "Agreement is Feature-Sharing" (2000), Northeastern University, Boston
- Hicks, G., "The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations" (2009), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Hiraiwa, K., "Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese", Proceedings of the MIT-Haward Joint Conference (HUMIT 2000), pp.67~80 (2001)
- 김성해, "PRO vs. Equi-DP", 영어영문학연구, 52(4), pp.115~132 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 구자혁, "Pronouns and Their Referential Dependencies", 영어영문학연구, 55(1), pp.1~23 (2013), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Landau, I., "Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions" (2000), Kluwer
- 이경화, "Agree-based Construal: With Reference to Narrowest C-command Relation", 영어영문학연구, 54(4), pp.347~368 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Legate, J. A., "Phases in “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy”", Ms, pp.2002
- Legate, J. A, "Some Interface Properties of the Phase", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.506~616 (2003)
- Nunes, J., "The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the minimalist program", PhD, pp.1995
- Nunes, J., "Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement" (2004), IT Press, Cambridge, MA
- Pesetsky, D, "The syntax of valuation and interpretability of features" (2004), MIT Press
- Pesetsky, D, "phrasal and Clausal Architecture", pp.262~294 (2007)
- Sundaresan, S, "To Appear. A phase-based account of the pro", anaphor distinction, ~
- Svenonius, P., "Peripheries: Syntactic Edge and their Effect" (2004), Kluwer
- Zeijlstra, H., "There is only one way to Agree", Talk given at GLOW, 33 (2010), Wroclaw, Poland