Long-distance anaphora and the blocking effect
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims at giving a principled account of long-distance anaphora including the blocking effect under the LF movement analysis of LD reflexives in the Minimalist Inquiries framework. I have shown that the absence of the blocking effect for Korean LD anaphora does not follow from the Feature Percolation Principles put forward by Cole, Hermon & Huang (2006). Thus I put forth the Feature Percolation Principle to properly handle the blocking effect for Chinese LD anaphora and the absence of the blocking effect for LD anaphora in Italian, Icelandic, and Korean. The Chinese LD reflexive with no inherent ϕ-features gets and checks its ϕ-features in terms of the Feature Percolation Principle at LF. Overall, it is shown that the blocking effect exhibited by the Chinese LD anaphor follows from its lack of inherent ϕ-featuress and the Feature Percolation Principle, and that the absence of the blocking effect for the LD reflexives in Korean, Italian, and Icelandic is due to the fact that they have inherent ϕ-features.
Abstract
This paper aims at giving a principled account of long-distance anaphora including the blocking effect under the LF movement analysis of LD reflexives in the Minimalist Inquiries framework. I have shown that the absence of the blocking effect for Korean LD anaphora does not follow from the Feature Percolation Principles put forward by Cole, Hermon & Huang (2006). Thus I put forth the Feature Percolation Principle to properly handle the blocking effect for Chinese LD anaphora and the absence of the blocking effect for LD anaphora in Italian, Icelandic, and Korean. The Chinese LD reflexive with no inherent ϕ-features gets and checks its ϕ-features in terms of the Feature Percolation Principle at LF. Overall, it is shown that the blocking effect exhibited by the Chinese LD anaphor follows from its lack of inherent ϕ-featuress and the Feature Percolation Principle, and that the absence of the blocking effect for the LD reflexives in Korean, Italian, and Icelandic is due to the fact that they have inherent ϕ-features.
참고문헌 (37)
- Aarts, Bas, "Small clauses in English: The non-verbal types" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Arnold, Jennifer E, "Reference form and discourse patterns", PhD, pp.1998
- Battistella, Edwin, "Chinese reflexivization : A movement to infl approach", Linguistics, 27, pp.987~1012 (1989)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Semantics and contextual expression", pp.1989, Kluwer
- Cho, Sook-Whan, "The syntactic and semantic ambiguity of caki ‘self’ in Korean", Korean Linguistics, 13(1), pp.149~165 (2006)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), Cambridge
- Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky, Noam, "Principles and parameters in comparative grammar", pp.417~454 (1991), MIT Press
- Minimalist inquiries: The framework, "Chomsky, Noam", MIT, ~, pp.MIT occasional papers in linguistics 15 (1998)
- Derivation by phase, "Chomsky, Noam", MIT, ~, pp.MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 (1999)
- Cole, Peter, "The Blackwell companion to syntax I", pp.21~84 (2006), Blackwell Publisher
- Cole, Peter, "Head movement and long-distance reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.355~406 (1994)
- Cole, Peter, "Antecedents and blockers of long distance reflexives : The case of Chinese ziji", Linguistic Inquiry, 27, pp.357~390 (1996)
- Han, Chung-hye, "Semantic binding of long-distance anaphor caki in Korean", Language, 88(4), pp.764~790 (2012)
- Huang, C.-T. James, "Long-distance anaphora", pp.263~282 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Kaiser, Elsi, "Effects of topic and focus on salience", Proceedings of sinn und bedeutung, 10, pp.139~154 (2006)
- Kang, Beom-Mo, "Unbounded reflexives", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, pp.415~456 (1988)
- Katada, Fusa, "The LF representation of anaphors", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.287~313 (1991)
- 김일규, "On Blocking Effects in Chinese: Syntactic, Pragmatic, or Both?", 언어, 38(2), pp.305~325 (2013), 한국언어학회
- Kim, Soo-Yeon, "Acceptability and preference in the interpretation of anaphors", Linguistics, 38, pp.315~353 (2000)
- Kim, Yong-Suk, "Minimalist Grammar of Reflexives" (1999), Hankuk Publishers
- Lebeaux, David, "A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.723~730 (1983)
- Lee, Chungmin, "Abstract syntax and Korean with reference to English", PhD, pp.1973
- Lee, Hye-Ran, "A feature-based account of long-distance anaphora", Korean Linguistics, 9, pp.133~150 (1998), Hankuk Publishers
- Lee, Hye-Ran, "How anaphors recover their references", Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 14, pp.629~649 (2001)
- O’grady, William, "The interpretation of Korean anaphora : The role and representation of grammatical relations", Language, 63, pp.251~277 (1987)
- Pica, Pierre, "Grammatical representation", pp.259~291 (1984), Foris
- Pollard, Carl, "Syntax and semantics, Vol. 33", pp.317~342 (2001), Academic Press
- Pollock, Jean-Yves, "Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Progovac, Ljiljana, "Long-distance reflexives : Movement-to-Infl versus relativized SUBJECT", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.755~772 (1993)
- Reinhart, Tanya, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
- Sells, Peter, "Aspects of logophoricity", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.445~479 (1987)
- Wexler, Kenneth, "Parameters, binding theory, and learnability", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.413~444 (1987)
- Xu, Liejiong, "Long distance binding of ziji", Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 21, pp.123~141 (1993)
- Yu, X.-F. William, "Logophoricity in Chinese", Paper presented at the Third North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (1991), Cornell University