A Syntactic Derivational Process w.r.t. Anaphoric Relations
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is designed to illustrate how the anaphoric relations are processed in the syntactic derivation under the C-command condition. Binding Theory has depended on the C-command condition, in that an antecedent must C-command a reflexive pronoun. However, the Minimalist perspectives claim that once entering into the syntax course, all lexical items should be processed via Agree and Merge. Especially, Agree mechanism demands that a probe with unvalued features should locate its potential goals all in its C-command area. Instead of indexing, the φ features specified on lexical items can show the reference identification between a reflexive/pronoun and its antecedent via syntactic operations. I propose that the modified φ feature specifications on each DP are more useful to reveal the relation between a reflexive and its antecedent than indexing. There is a remaining problem as to what makes a reflexive related to its antecedents. There is no probe-goal relation between an antecedent and a reflexive. It may be possible that a head T probes for both the two DPs. For this purpose, we should find out the way for a head T to probe the two multiply.
Abstract
This paper is designed to illustrate how the anaphoric relations are processed in the syntactic derivation under the C-command condition. Binding Theory has depended on the C-command condition, in that an antecedent must C-command a reflexive pronoun. However, the Minimalist perspectives claim that once entering into the syntax course, all lexical items should be processed via Agree and Merge. Especially, Agree mechanism demands that a probe with unvalued features should locate its potential goals all in its C-command area. Instead of indexing, the φ features specified on lexical items can show the reference identification between a reflexive/pronoun and its antecedent via syntactic operations. I propose that the modified φ feature specifications on each DP are more useful to reveal the relation between a reflexive and its antecedent than indexing. There is a remaining problem as to what makes a reflexive related to its antecedents. There is no probe-goal relation between an antecedent and a reflexive. It may be possible that a head T probes for both the two DPs. For this purpose, we should find out the way for a head T to probe the two multiply.
참고문헌 (12)
- Brody, Michael, "Elements of grammar", pp.193~ (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Heinat, Fredrik, "Reflexives in a Phase based Syntax", Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 75, pp.37~54 (2006)
- 이경화, "Modified Feature Specifications w.r.t. Anaphoric Dependency", 영어영문학연구, 57(4), pp.283~303 (2015), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 이경화, "Minimalist Approach to How to Encode Anaphoric Relations", 영어영문학연구, 58(2), pp.283~302 (2016), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Pesetsky, David, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.355~426 (2001), MIT Press
- Pesetsky, David, "The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features", pp.2004, MIT and UMass
- Reuland, Eric, "Binding conditions: How are they derived?", The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp.578~293 (2006), CLSI Publications
- Reuland, Eric, "Anaphora and language design" (2011), MIT Press
- Svenonius, Peter, "A few from building E39: working papers in syntax, semantics, and their interface, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics", pp.267~289 (2001), MITWPL