Agree-based Construal: With Reference to Narrowest C-command Relation
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relation between anaphor and antecedent based on agree and to suggest more flexible one by employing the narrowest c-command. The antecedent of an anaphor must be found within the local clause through feature sharing. The features for them to share are Φ features, which are interpretable valued for antecedents, but which are interpretable unvalued for anaphors. Thus, these features can explain the relation between them. This agree-based approach is closely related to the two kinds of c-command relations. One is a sister-contain relation where probe with unvalued features must search its goals down with valued features and get values. The other is a sister relation made by merging two constituents. Upon merging the two from the numeration, they should c-command each other and share with each other. This paper suggests that the latter relation called the narrowest c-command be more efficient than the former one. This agree-mechanism can be useful: (i) faster syntactic derivational process, (ii) more powerful phase heads, and (iii) more flexible probe- goal relation. This paper claims that the narrowest c-command enables most structures to make the strong derivational process.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relation between anaphor and antecedent based on agree and to suggest more flexible one by employing the narrowest c-command. The antecedent of an anaphor must be found within the local clause through feature sharing. The features for them to share are Φ features, which are interpretable valued for antecedents, but which are interpretable unvalued for anaphors. Thus, these features can explain the relation between them. This agree-based approach is closely related to the two kinds of c-command relations. One is a sister-contain relation where probe with unvalued features must search its goals down with valued features and get values. The other is a sister relation made by merging two constituents. Upon merging the two from the numeration, they should c-command each other and share with each other. This paper suggests that the latter relation called the narrowest c-command be more efficient than the former one. This agree-mechanism can be useful: (i) faster syntactic derivational process, (ii) more powerful phase heads, and (iii) more flexible probe- goal relation. This paper claims that the narrowest c-command enables most structures to make the strong derivational process.
참고문헌 (25)
- Adger,David, "Core Syntax: A minimalist approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Adger,David, "A Minimalist Theory of Feature Structure, In Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Adger, David, "Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies revisited", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.161~193 (2005)
- Chomsky,Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky,Noam, "Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin and use" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky,Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), IT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist Inquiries: the framework, In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Derivation by Phase, In Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy, In Structures and Beyond", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Frampton, John, "Agreement is feature sharing", 석사, pp.2000
- Heinat,F, "Probes, Pronouns and Binding in the Minimalist Program", 박사, pp.2008
- Hicks,Glyn, "The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations Linguistik Aktuell" (2009), John Benjmins
- Hornstein,N, "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- 김성해, "PRO vs. Equi-DP", 영어영문학연구, 52(4), pp.115~132 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Legate, J. A, "Some interface properties of the phase", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.506~516 (2003)
- Pesetsky, David, "The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features" (2004), MIT Press
- Pesetsky, David, "Features, case and syntactic categories", Lecture Hand-out, Lund University, ~ (2005)
- Pesetsky, David, "The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features, In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture", pp.262~294 (2007)
- Reinhart, T, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
- Reuland,Eric, "Primitives of binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.439~492 (2001)
- Reuland, Eric, "Binding Conditions : How are they Derived?", HPSG05 Conference (2005), CSLI Publications
- Reuland,Eric, "Agreeing to Bind, In Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Reimsdijk", pp.505~513 (2005), Walter de Gruyter
- Reuland,Eric, "Minimal versus not so minimal pronouns, In The Linguistics Enterprise" (2010), John Benjamins
- "2007", ~
- Rezac,Milan, "Elements of cyclic syntax : Agree and Merge", 박사, pp.2004