Do So Anaphora in English and Korean: With Respect to Depictives, Temporal Adjuncts and ECM Constructions
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Do so anaphora and its Korean counterpart kuleh may be adjoined to VP or vP in the light verb construction (Chomsky 1995). Depictive predicates are secondary predicative adjuncts associated with a verbal projection. Depictive predicates have two varieties: object depictives (ODs) and subject depictives (SDs). Unlike ODs, SDs can be remnants within the context of do so anaphora: SDs are vP adjuncts and ODs are VP adjuncts (Kim 2011). TAs such as on Tuesday adjoin either inside or outside VP. However, the TAs must be adjoined to vP when discourse effects such as contrastiveness or intonation highlighting are given to TAs. Thus, the contrasting TAs are stranded in vP when do so anaphora undergoes VP-anaphorization. The supposed position of the ECMed nominal is the outer spec of vP. There are further paradigms which are explicable only on the assumption that an ECMed element in Korean must be in the upper clause. A sentential adverb adjoined to the matrix vP can be interposed between the ECMed element and the lower predicate, but not between a nominative subject and the lower VP. This testifies that the ECMed element occupies the matrix vP. Kuleh may replace the vP including the ECMed one. It may also replace the matrix non-ECMed VP.
Abstract
Do so anaphora and its Korean counterpart kuleh may be adjoined to VP or vP in the light verb construction (Chomsky 1995). Depictive predicates are secondary predicative adjuncts associated with a verbal projection. Depictive predicates have two varieties: object depictives (ODs) and subject depictives (SDs). Unlike ODs, SDs can be remnants within the context of do so anaphora: SDs are vP adjuncts and ODs are VP adjuncts (Kim 2011). TAs such as on Tuesday adjoin either inside or outside VP. However, the TAs must be adjoined to vP when discourse effects such as contrastiveness or intonation highlighting are given to TAs. Thus, the contrasting TAs are stranded in vP when do so anaphora undergoes VP-anaphorization. The supposed position of the ECMed nominal is the outer spec of vP. There are further paradigms which are explicable only on the assumption that an ECMed element in Korean must be in the upper clause. A sentential adverb adjoined to the matrix vP can be interposed between the ECMed element and the lower predicate, but not between a nominative subject and the lower VP. This testifies that the ECMed element occupies the matrix vP. Kuleh may replace the vP including the ECMed one. It may also replace the matrix non-ECMed VP.
참고문헌 (31)
- Baltine, M., "Deletion vs. pro-forms: an overly simple dichotomy?", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30 (2012)
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries, In Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation By Phase, In Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chung, W., "The derivation of kuleh and its phasehood", Proceedings of the 15th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, pp.71~89 (2013)
- Culicover, P., "Natural Language Syntax" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Déchaine, R. -M., "Predicates across categories: Towards a category-neutral syntax", 박사, pp.1993
- Déchaine, R. -M., "Ellipsis and the position of subjects", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 24, pp.47~63 (1994)
- Depiante, M. A., "The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping", bare argument ellipsis, University of Connecticut at Storrs, 2000
- Elbourne, P, "Ellipsis sites as definite descriptions", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.191~220 (2008)
- Fu, J., "The VP within process nominals: Evident from adverbs and the VP anaphor do-so", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, pp.549~582 (2001)
- 하승완, "Re-binding Puzzles in Korean VP-anaphora: Evidence for the PF-LF Interface", 언어, 35(2), pp.471~487 (2010), 한국언어학회
- Hankamer, J., "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.391~428 (1976)
- Hornstein, N., "Predication and PRO", Language, 63, pp.23~52 (1987)
- Houser, M. J., "On the anaphoric status of do so", 석사, pp.2008
- Isac, Dana, "Depictives: Syntactic and interpretive asymmetries, In UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation", pp.3~26 (2005), John Benjamin
- Jung, Y.-J., "Decomposing Ditransitive Verbs", Proceedings of SICGG, Summer 2004, pp.101~120 (2004)
- Kehler, A., "Event reference and semantic transparency", Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, 37, pp.115~127 (2007)
- 김정석, "Depictives in VP Anaphora", 언어, 36(4), pp.843~862 (2011), 한국언어학회
- Ko, H., "Predication and Edge Effects", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, pp.725~778 (2011)
- Koizumi, M., "Secondary predicates", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.25~79 (1994)
- Kuno. S., "Conditions for verb phrase deletion", Foundations of Language, 13, pp.161~175 (1975)
- Lasnik, H., "Minimalist analysis" (1999), Blackwell
- 이두원, "Structural Case-driven Object Shift of ECMed Nominals out of the CP", 언어학, 15(1), pp.39~63 (2007), 대한언어학회
- 이두원, "Janusian Idioms: with Reference to Them + Null Postposition vs. Theme + Lexical Verb", 현대문법연구, 49(49), pp.21~47 (2007), 현대문법학회
- 이두원, "Cancellation of Intervention Effects in the Modal External Negation Context", 영어영문학연구, 54(2), pp.173~194 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- McNulty, E., "The syntax of adjunct predicates", 박사, pp.1988
- Park, M., "The Syntax of VP Ellipsis in Korean", Language Research, 33, pp.629~648 (1997)
- Radford, A., "Minimalist Syntax" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Ward, G., "A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands", Language, 67, pp.439~474 (1991)
- Yoon, J. H.-S., "Ambiguity of Government and the Chain Condition", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, pp.105~162 (1996)