본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparative Analysis of Depictive Secondary Predicates between English and Korean

이성용
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2022.08|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제29권 제3호|pp. 161-184|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2022.29.3.161

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

복합술어hybrid approachmanner adverbs양태부사complex predicateserial verb constructiondepictive secondary predicatessubject-oriented depictivesobject-oriented depictives묘사이차술어주어-지향 묘사술어목적어-지향 묘사술어연쇄동사구문혼합분석
주제분류언어학

초록

Depictive secondary predicates in English are usually realized as AP, PP, or DP, while depictives in Korean are normally realized as AdvP('-key') or PP('-(u)lo'). Therefore, some previous analyses for English depictives such as small clause analysis, flat ternary analysis, adjunction analysis and complex predicate analysis are not adequate enough to accurately account for the syntactic properties of Korean depictives. This paper discusses some similarities and differences in syntactic and semantic properties of depictives between English and Korean, and shows that these similarities and differences can be naturally accounted for under Lee's(2021) hybrid approach, where the Korean subject-oriented depictive is analyzed as a VP-adjunct, such as the manner adverb, while the Korean object-oriented depictive and the following V form a complex predicate, such as serial verb constructions.

Abstract

Depictive secondary predicates in English are usually realized as AP, PP, or DP, while depictives in Korean are normally realized as AdvP('-key') or PP('-(u)lo'). Therefore, some previous analyses for English depictives such as small clause analysis, flat ternary analysis, adjunction analysis and complex predicate analysis are not adequate enough to accurately account for the syntactic properties of Korean depictives. This paper discusses some similarities and differences in syntactic and semantic properties of depictives between English and Korean, and shows that these similarities and differences can be naturally accounted for under Lee's(2021) hybrid approach, where the Korean subject-oriented depictive is analyzed as a VP-adjunct, such as the manner adverb, while the Korean object-oriented depictive and the following V form a complex predicate, such as serial verb constructions.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Korean Linguistics Ⅵ, "Japanese", pp.1990, Ahn, H. D.
  2. Andrews, A, "A Note on the Constituent Structure of Adverbials and Auxiliaries", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.313~317 (1982)
  3. Bailyn, J, "Configurational Case Assignment in Russian Syntax", The Linguistic Review, 12(4), pp.315~360 (1995)
  4. Bak, J. H., "The Light Verb Construction in Korean", Ph. D., pp.2011
  5. Baker, M. C, "Object Sharing and Projection in Serial Verb Constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, 20(4), pp.513~553 (1989)
  6. Bowers, J, "The Syntax of Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4), pp.591~656 (1993)
  7. Choi, I. C., "Mixed Categories and Argument Transfer in the Korean Light Verb Construction", Proceedings of HPSG 2001, pp.103~120 (2001), CSLI Publications
  8. Chomsky, N., "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  9. 정찬, "Korean Serial Verb Constructions: A Construction-Based Approach", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.559~582 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  10. Collins, C, "Argument Sharing in Serial Verb Constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, 28(3), pp.461~497 (1997)
  11. Why are Depictives Different from Resultatives?, "Cormack, A.", 251~284, pp.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11 (1999)
  12. Dechaine, R., "Predicates across Categories: Towards a Category-Neutral Syntax", Ph. D., pp.1993
  13. Dechaine, R, "Ellipsis and the Position of Subjects", NELS, 23, pp.47~63 (1994)
  14. Ernst, T., "The Syntax of Adjuncts" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  15. Himmelmann, N. P., "Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification", pp.1~67 (2005), Oxford University Press
  16. On Extraction of Secondary Predicates in English, "Ike-uchi, M.", 125~162, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13 (1990)
  17. Isac, D., "UG and External Systems: Language, Brain and Computation", pp.3~26 (2005), Benjamins Publishing Company
  18. Kim, L., "On the Ditransitive Construction in Korean", Proceedings of ConSOLE ⅩⅤ, pp.111~133 (2008)
  19. Double Nominative Constructions in Korean, "Kim, Y. K.", 297~321, pp.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7 (1996)
  20. Ko, H. J, "Predication and Edge Effects", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(3), pp.725~778 (2011)
  21. Koizumi, M, "Secondary Predicates", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.25~79 (1994)
  22. Kuno, S., "Remarks on Unaccusativity and Unergativity in Japanese and Korean", Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 12, pp.280~294 (2003)
  23. Light Predicate Raising, "Larson, R.", MIT Center for Cognitive Science, ~, pp.Lexicon Project Working Papers 27 (1988)
  24. 이성용, "A Hybrid Approach to Depictive Secondary Predicates in Korean", 언어과학, 28(2), pp.197~217 (2021), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  25. Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
  26. Maling, J., "Dative: The Heterogeneity of the Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions, and Thematic Roles", Lingua, 111(4), pp.419~464 (2001)[DOI]
  27. McNulty, E., "The Syntax of Adjunct Predicates", Ph. D., pp.1988
  28. Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
  29. Radford, A., "Transformational Grammar: A First Course" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  30. Rapopport, T. R., "Syntax and Semantics 25", pp.159~187 (1991), Academic Press
  31. Richards, N., "Movement in Language" (2001), Oxford University Press
  32. Roberts, I, "Predicative APs", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(4), pp.703~710 (1988)
  33. Rothstein, S., "The Syntactic Forms of Predication", Ph. D., pp.1983
  34. Secondary Predication and Aspectual Structure, "Rothstein, S", 241~264, pp.ZAS Papers in Linguistics 17 (2000)
  35. Rothstein, S., "Predicates and Their Subject" (2000), Kluwer
  36. What are Incremental Themes?, "Rothstein, S.", 139~157, pp.ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22 (2001)
  37. Schultze-Berndt, E., "Depictive Secondary Predicates in Crosslinguistic Perspective", Linguistic Typology, 8, pp.59~131 (2004)[DOI]
  38. Speas, M., "Phrase Structure in Natural Language" (1990), Kluwer
  39. Stowell, T., "Subjects Across Categories", The Linguistic Review, 2(3), pp.285~312 (1983)
  40. The Syntax of Korean Multiple Nominative Constructions, "Suh, S. K.", 105~120, pp.University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 1 (1993)
  41. Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11(1), pp.203~238 (1980)
  42. Winkler, S., "Focus and Secondary Predication" (1997), Mouton de Gruyter
  43. Wyner, A. Z., "Events and Grammar", pp.333~348 (1998), Kluwer
  44. 여승주, "What is it LIke Being an Adjective in Korean?", 어학연구, 40(4), pp.1013~1033 (2004), 언어교육원
  45. Yoo, H. K., "A Study on Korean Adjectives" (1998), Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
  46. Zubizarreta, M. L., "On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion" (2007), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

A Hybrid Approach to Depictive Secondary Predicates in Korean이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2021 · 제28권 제2호A Comparative Analysis of Resultative Constructions in English and Korean이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2018 · 제25권 제2호Notes on Depictive Secondary Predicates홍수민한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2012 · 제19권 제1호Serial Verb Constructions and Object-Oriented Depictive Secondary Predicates in Agglutinative Languages이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2025 · 제32권 제1호Manner-Result Complementarity and the Serial Verb Construction in Korean강상구사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2019 · 제27권 제2호On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives고희정한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

중국인 한국어 학습자의 명사 유생성 제약에 따른 한국어 복수 표지 습득김소영pp. 1-24플립 러닝을 활용한 영어교육 전공수업에 대한 예비 영어교사의 인식과 만족도 연구남정미pp. 25-46한국어 공간어 대립 어휘쌍의 무표성과 의미확장의 비대칭성에 관한 연구박기성pp. 47-65거절의 화행에 대한 한국-네덜란드 성인 화자 간 대조 분석신효정pp. 67-87코로나19 이후 실시간 온라인 수업에 대한 한국어 학습자의 인식 연구이정화pp. 89-110
원문 보기