Extraction out of overt anaphora: Korean kule(h) 'so' versus English so
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines some novel phenomena of extraction out of overt anaphora such as Korean kule(h)- 'so' and English so. These anaphora allegedly have a grammatical role of substituting for several different syntactic constituents such as VP, AP, AdvP, TP, or CP alone or together with the Korean light verb ha- 'do' or the English one do or copula be. We show that Korean kule(h)- 'so' allows for an extraction out of it when the extraction is an instance of A-movement, but the English counterpart so does not. We submit the thesis that this contrast essentially follows from the so-called multiple Spec hypothesis (cf. Kuroda (1988)). Korean allows multiple Spec's, but English does not. Specifically, the Spec position of the light verb is an exit for the extraction out of the VP to be substituted for by the VP anaphora. This position can be taken advantage of by Korean with the multiple Spec strategy, but not by English without it. Furthermore, the extraction out of the kuleh- 'so' anaphora renders support to Lasnik's (1999) proposal that A-movement, unlike A-bar movement, does not necessarily leave a trace/copy.
Abstract
This paper examines some novel phenomena of extraction out of overt anaphora such as Korean kule(h)- 'so' and English so. These anaphora allegedly have a grammatical role of substituting for several different syntactic constituents such as VP, AP, AdvP, TP, or CP alone or together with the Korean light verb ha- 'do' or the English one do or copula be. We show that Korean kule(h)- 'so' allows for an extraction out of it when the extraction is an instance of A-movement, but the English counterpart so does not. We submit the thesis that this contrast essentially follows from the so-called multiple Spec hypothesis (cf. Kuroda (1988)). Korean allows multiple Spec's, but English does not. Specifically, the Spec position of the light verb is an exit for the extraction out of the VP to be substituted for by the VP anaphora. This position can be taken advantage of by Korean with the multiple Spec strategy, but not by English without it. Furthermore, the extraction out of the kuleh- 'so' anaphora renders support to Lasnik's (1999) proposal that A-movement, unlike A-bar movement, does not necessarily leave a trace/copy.
참고문헌 (32)
- Ahn, Sung-Ho, "Korean quantification and universal grammar", PhD, pp.1990
- Baltin, Mark, "Deletion versus proforms: An overly simple dichotomy?", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30, pp.381~423 (2012)
- Chang, Suk-Jin, "An analysis of conversation: Information and Anaphora (in Korean)", Applied Linguistics, 8(2), pp.105~121 (1976), Language Institute, Seoul National University
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chung, Woo-Jin, "Elliptical predications in Korean", 석사, pp.2014
- Haddican, Bill, "The structural deficiency of verbal pro-forms", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.539~547 (2007)
- Hankamer, Jorge, "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.391~426 (1976)
- Hong, Jong-Sun, "A study of Korean anaphoric verbs(in Korean)", Korean Language and Literature, 109, pp.83~101 (1993)
- Houser, Michael J., "The syntax and semantics of do so anaphora", PhD, pp.2010
- Huddleston, Rodney, "The Cambridge grammar of the English language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Kayne, Richard, "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kim, Ki-Hyuk, "A study of Korean grammar (in Korean)" (1995), Pakiceng
- Kim, Sun-Woong, "ECM and AGRoP in Korean", A collections of humanities and sciences research papers at Kwangwoon University, 25, pp.39~49 (1996)
- 김선웅, "The X0-EPP: A Case of Head-Head Dependency", 생성문법연구, 13(2), pp.253~283 (2003), 한국생성문법학회
- Koopman, Hilda, "Syntax at sunset", pp.37~64 (1996), University of California, Los Angeles
- Kuroda, Sige-Yuki, "Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese", Linguisticae Investigationes, 12, pp.1~47 (1988)
- Landau, Idan, "Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, pp.779~813 (2011)
- A note on pseudogapping, "Lasnik, Howard", 143~163, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 27 (1995)
- Lasnik, Howard, "Minimalist analysis" (1999), Blackwell
- Lasnik, Howard, "Move-alpha: Conditions on its application and output" (1992), MIT Press
- 이정훈, "보조용언 구문의 구조와 대용 현상", 한국어학, 49, pp.319~344 (2010), 한국어학회
- Lee, Jeong-Shik, "Case alternation in Korean: Case minimality", PhD, pp.1992
- Levin, Nancy, "verb ellipsis in spoken English", PhD, pp.1986
- Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- 박명관, "The Syntax of Clausal and Verbal Pro-form", Ellipsis in Korean: Focusing on mit- 'believe' and sayngkakha- 'think' Verbs, 2013, pp.23(2), 221~242[DOI]
- 박명관, "Asymmetry Between CP and TP Ellipsis and Its Consequences on Extractability: Evidence from Korean", 어학연구, 49(2), pp.205~226 (2013), 언어교육원
- Pinkham, Jessie, "The formation of comparative clauses in French and English" (1985), Garland publishing
- Stroik, Thomas, "On the light verb hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.362~269 (2001)
- Thomson, Adrea., "Categorizing surface proforms in the typology of anaphora. A handout read in Ellipsis 2012", Universidade de Vigo, ~ (2012)
- Um, Chung-Ho, "The scope and category of verbal complements", Korean Linguistics, 33, pp.399~429 (1999)
- Yang, Myung Hi, "A study of the substitutes in the modern Korean language" (1998), Taehaksa