본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Hybrid Approach to Depictive Secondary Predicates in Korean

이성용
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2021.05|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제28권 제2호|pp. 197-217|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2021.28.2.197

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

복합술어manner adverbs양태부사complex predicates연쇄동사depictive secondary predicatessubject-oriented depictives묘사이차술어주어-지향 묘사술어VP-adjunctsserial verbsVP-부가어
주제분류언어학

초록

Depictive secondary predicates have been a central topic of discussion in the vast literature for a long time, providing a lot of challenges for syntactic and semantic theory. There have been many syntactic analyses of depictive secondary predicates: small clause/control analysis, flat ternary analysis, adjunction analysis and complex predicate analysis. This paper discusses depictive secondary predicates in Korean and proposes a hybrid approach to Korean depictives in order to account for the different properties of subject-oriented depictives(SOD) and object-oriented depictives(OOD). In this paper, we make three main claims: (i) Korean –key depictives are not adjectival predicates, but adverbs, (ii) Korean SODs are similar to manner adverbs, and adjoined to VP, and (iii) Korean OODs are adjoined to V and form a complex predicate with the following verb, just like serial verbs.

Abstract

Depictive secondary predicates have been a central topic of discussion in the vast literature for a long time, providing a lot of challenges for syntactic and semantic theory. There have been many syntactic analyses of depictive secondary predicates: small clause/control analysis, flat ternary analysis, adjunction analysis and complex predicate analysis. This paper discusses depictive secondary predicates in Korean and proposes a hybrid approach to Korean depictives in order to account for the different properties of subject-oriented depictives(SOD) and object-oriented depictives(OOD). In this paper, we make three main claims: (i) Korean –key depictives are not adjectival predicates, but adverbs, (ii) Korean SODs are similar to manner adverbs, and adjoined to VP, and (iii) Korean OODs are adjoined to V and form a complex predicate with the following verb, just like serial verbs.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Andrews, A., "A Note on the Constituent Structure of Adverbials and Auxiliaries", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.313~317 (1982)
  2. Bailyn, J., "Configurational Case Assignment in Russian Syntax", The Linguistic Review, 12, pp.315~360 (1995)
  3. Baker, M., "Object Sharing and Projection in Serial Verb Constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.513~554 (1989)
  4. Baker, M., "A Serial Verb Construction without Constructions", Rutgerts, ~ (2002)
  5. Bowers, J., "The Syntax of Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.591~657 (1993)
  6. 정찬, "Korean Serial Verb Constructions: A Construction-Based Approach", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.559~582 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  7. Chung, T., "Argument Structure and Serial Verbs in Korean", 박사, pp.1993
  8. Cinque, G., "A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.239~298 (1993)
  9. Cinque, G., "Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective" (1999), Oxford University Press
  10. Collins, C., "Argument Sharing in Serial Verb Constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, 28(3), pp.461~497 (1997)
  11. Why Are Depictives Different from Resultatives?, "Cormack, A.", UCL, 251~284, pp.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11 (1999)
  12. Dechaine, R., "Predicates across Categories: Towards a Category-Neutral Syntax", 박사, pp.1993
  13. Dechaine, R, "Ellipsis and the Position of Subjects", NELS, 23, pp.47~63 (1994)
  14. Dolling, J., "Modifying Adjuncts", pp.586~621 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  15. Ernst, T., "The Syntax of Adjuncts" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  16. Himmelmann, N. P., "Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification", pp.1~67 (2005), Oxford University Press
  17. Hoekstra, T., "Small Clause Results", Lingua, 74, pp.101~139 (1988)
  18. Isac, D., "UG and External Systems: Language, Brain and Computation", pp.3~26 (2005), John Benjamins
  19. Scrambling and Its Interaction with Stress and Focus, "Ishihara, S.", MIT, 95~110, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 38 (2000)
  20. Jang, Y., "The Syntax and Semantics of Predication (Texas Linguistic Forum 38)", pp.149~159 (1997), University of Texas, Department of Linguistics
  21. 김종복, "Argument Composition in Korean Serial Verb Constructions", 현대문법연구, (61), pp.1~24 (2010), 현대문법학회
  22. Kim, J. Y., "Complex Verbs and Argument Structure in Korean", 박사, pp.1998
  23. Koizumi, M., "Secondary Predicates", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.24~79 (1994)
  24. Kuno, S., "Remarks on Unaccusativity and Unergativity in Japanese and Korean", Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 12, pp.280~294 (2003)
  25. Light Predicate Raising, "Larson, R.", MIT Center for Cognitive Science, 1~80, pp.Lexicon Project Working Papers 27 (1988)
  26. Larson, R., "Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches", pp.185~210 (1991), John Benjamins
  27. Lee, S., "The Syntax and Semantics of Serial Verb Constructions", 박사, pp.1992
  28. 이성용, "Cyclic Computation of Focus Intonation in Numeral Quantifier Floating Constructions in Korean", 언어과학, 23(4), pp.281~306 (2016), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  29. McNulty, E., "The Syntax of Adjunct Predicates", 박사, pp.1988
  30. Progovac, L., "Structure for Coordination (Part 1)", GLOT International, 3(7), pp.3~6 (1998)
  31. Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
  32. Roberts, I., "Predicative APs", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.703~710 (1988)
  33. Rothstein, S., "The Syntactic Forms of Predication", 박사, pp.1983
  34. Rothstein, S., "Papers on Predicate Constructions", pp.139~157 (2001), Kluwer
  35. Rothstein, S., "Modifying adjuncts", pp.553~590 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  36. Sells, P., "Structural Relationships Within Complex Predicates", The 11th International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp.115~147 (1998), Hankwuk Publishing
  37. Speas, M., "Phrase Structure in Natural Language", 석사, pp.1988
  38. Stewart, O. T., "The Serial Verb Construction Parameter" (2001), Garland Publishing
  39. Stowell, T., "Subjects across Categories", The Linguistic Review, 2, pp.285~312 (1983)
  40. Suh, Y., "A Study of the Auxiliary Verb Construction and Verb Serialization in Korean", 박사, pp.2000
  41. Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
  42. Winkler, S., "Focus and Secondary Predication" (1997), Mouton de Gruyter
  43. Wyner, A. Z., "Events and Grammar", pp.333~348 (1998), Kluwer
  44. Zhang, N., "Coordination in Syntax" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  45. Zubizarreta, M. L., "Linguistic Inquiry Monographs" (2007), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

A Comparative Analysis of Depictive Secondary Predicates between English and Korean이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2022 · 제29권 제3호Serial Verb Constructions and Object-Oriented Depictive Secondary Predicates in Agglutinative Languages이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2025 · 제32권 제1호Notes on Depictive Secondary Predicates홍수민한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2012 · 제19권 제1호Korean Serial Verb Constructions: A Construction-Based Approach정찬, 김종복한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2008 · 제18권 제4호Manner/Result Complemetarity in Korean Directed Motion Events홍수민한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2018 · 제25권 제3호A Comparative Analysis of Resultative Constructions in English and Korean이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2018 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

외국인을 위한 고유어와 한자어의 유의어 교육 방안 연구 -상황 맥락을 바탕으로-권연진, 김남정pp. 1-21중학교 영어 형태초점 수업의 활동 양상 분석김영희, 김정렬pp. 23-47신문 사설의 코로나19 사태 관련 은유적 표현에 의한 부각과 은폐에 관한 연구김철규pp. 49-78한국어 복합동사 구문의 사건 구조와 의미 합성:‘-어 놓다’와 ‘-어 두다’의 경우김효진pp. 79-114자음과 전이음 간 영어 설단폐쇄음 약화 양상: 단어 경계를 중심으로신승훈pp. 115-138
원문 보기