본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Depictives in VP Anaphora

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Kim, Jeong-Seok. 2011. Depictives in VP Anaphora. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36-4, 843-862. The issue of predication enters the syntactic research through the seminal work of Halliday (1967), who draws attention to secondary predicates, which express properties of local subjects. Setting resultative predicates aside, this paper examines the structural height of depictive predicates in relation to VP anaphora such as do ellipsis and do so proverbalization. It is argued that the stranding paradox of depictives results from the adjunction height: subject depictives are adjoined to vP, and object depictives to VP. Given the light verb structure (Chomsky 1995), VP ellipsis elides the VP containing object depictives, thus stranding subject depictives, whereas vP ellipsis elides the vP containing subject depictives. (Korea University)

Abstract

Kim, Jeong-Seok. 2011. Depictives in VP Anaphora. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36-4, 843-862. The issue of predication enters the syntactic research through the seminal work of Halliday (1967), who draws attention to secondary predicates, which express properties of local subjects. Setting resultative predicates aside, this paper examines the structural height of depictive predicates in relation to VP anaphora such as do ellipsis and do so proverbalization. It is argued that the stranding paradox of depictives results from the adjunction height: subject depictives are adjoined to vP, and object depictives to VP. Given the light verb structure (Chomsky 1995), VP ellipsis elides the VP containing object depictives, thus stranding subject depictives, whereas vP ellipsis elides the vP containing subject depictives. (Korea University)

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Andrews, Avery, "A note on the constituent structure of adverbials and auxiliaries", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.313~317 (1982)
  2. Bowers, John, "The syntax of predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.591~656 (1993)
  3. Bowers, John, "Predication, In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.299~333 (2001), Blackwell Publishing
  4. Carrier, Jill, "The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.173~234 (1992)
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  7. Déchaine, Rose-Marie, "Predicates across categories: Towards a category-neutral syntax", 박사, pp.1993
  8. Déchaine, Rose-Marie, "Ellipsis and the position of subjects", In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 통권 : 24, pp.47~63 (1994)
  9. Diesing, Molly, "Indefinites" (1992), MIT Press
  10. Haegeman, Liliane, "Introduction to government and binding theory" (1994), Blackwell Publishing
  11. Halliday, Michael, "Notes on transitivity (Part I)", Journal of Linguistics, 3, pp.37~81 (1967)
  12. Hankamer, Jorge, "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.391~428 (1976)
  13. Hornstein, Norbert, "Predication and PRO", Language, 63, pp.23~52 (1987)
  14. Huang, C.-T. James, "Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.103~138 (1993)
  15. Isac, Dana, "Depictives: Syntactic and interpretive asymmetries, In UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation", pp.3~26 (2005), Benjamins Publishing Company
  16. Kayne, Richard, "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
  17. Keenan, Edward L., "Towards a universal definition of subject, In Subject and topic", pp.303~333 (1976), Academic Press
  18. in pseudogapping, "Korean Journal of Linguistics", 2000, 545~563
  19. Koopman, Hilda, "The position of subjects", Lingua, 85, pp.211~258 (1991)
  20. Kuno, Susumu, "Conditions for verb phrase deletion", Foundations of Language, 13, pp.161~175 (1975)
  21. Larson, Richard, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
  22. Lasnik, Howard, "Minimalist analysis" (1999), Blackwell Publishing
  23. Marantz, Alec, "On the nature of grammatical relations" (1984), MIT Press
  24. McNulty, Elaine, "The syntax of adjunct predicates", 박사, pp.1988
  25. Rapoport, Tova R., "Adjunct predicate licensing and D-structure, In Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing, Syntax and Semantics", pp.159~188 (1991), Academic Press
  26. Roberts, Ian, "Predicative APs", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.703~710 (1988)
  27. Rochemont, Michael S., "English focus constructions and the theory of grammar" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  28. Rothstein, Susan, "The syntactic forms of predication", 박사, pp.1983
  29. Rothstein, Susan, "Small clauses and copular constructions, In Small clauses", pp.27~48 (1995), Academic Press
  30. Rothstein, Susan, "Predicates and their subjects" (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  31. Rothstein, Susan, "Secondary predication, In The Blackwell companion to syntax IV", pp.209~233 (2006), Blackwell Publishing
  32. Schein, Barry, "Predication, In Small clauses", pp.49~76 (1995), Academic Press
  33. Speas, Margaret, "Phrase structure in natural language" (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  34. Stowell, Tim, "Subjects across categories", Linguistic Review, 2, pp.285~312 (1983)
  35. Williams, Edwin, "Discourse and logical form", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.101~139 (1977)
  36. Williams, Edwin, "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
  37. Williams, Edwin, "Against small clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.287~308 (1983)
  38. Winkler, Susanne, "Focus and secondary predication" (1997), Mouton de Gruyter
  39. Wunderlich, Dieter, "Argument extension by lexical adjunction", Journal of Semantics, 14, pp.95~142 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)