한국어와 영어 능격동사 비교
A Comparative Study of Ergative Verbs of Korean and English
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explains the difference and similarity of ergativity of Korean and English verbs. This study critically reviews Korean ergative verbs of Ko, K.J. (2001), Lee, E.J. (2014), Burzio (1996) and Korean middle verbs of Yeon, J.H. (1989, 2008). And we found out some problems in their explanations. For example, Ko, K.J. (2001) explains that an ergative verb or an unaccusative verb of Korean includes an adjective or an intransitive verb which is nonagentive, whereas an unergative verb includes an intransitive verb which is agentive. It is because some unaccusative verbs can’t be ergative verbs that Ko’s explanations are not always correct. We need to use the affectedness of the object noun (Levin 1993, Haspelath 1993 Dixon 1991, 2005), the change of state (Levin 1993), causer–causee (Fagan 1988), and spontaneous occurrence (Haspelmath 1993, Dixon 1991, 2005) to investigate Korean ergative verbs. We found out some differences between Korean and English ergative verbs. In Korean ergative constructions, the causer can appear within an adverbial phrase, whereas it can’t appear in English. And Korean ergative verbs have many onomatopoeic words but English counterparts don’t.
Abstract
This paper explains the difference and similarity of ergativity of Korean and English verbs. This study critically reviews Korean ergative verbs of Ko, K.J. (2001), Lee, E.J. (2014), Burzio (1996) and Korean middle verbs of Yeon, J.H. (1989, 2008). And we found out some problems in their explanations. For example, Ko, K.J. (2001) explains that an ergative verb or an unaccusative verb of Korean includes an adjective or an intransitive verb which is nonagentive, whereas an unergative verb includes an intransitive verb which is agentive. It is because some unaccusative verbs can’t be ergative verbs that Ko’s explanations are not always correct. We need to use the affectedness of the object noun (Levin 1993, Haspelath 1993 Dixon 1991, 2005), the change of state (Levin 1993), causer–causee (Fagan 1988), and spontaneous occurrence (Haspelmath 1993, Dixon 1991, 2005) to investigate Korean ergative verbs. We found out some differences between Korean and English ergative verbs. In Korean ergative constructions, the causer can appear within an adverbial phrase, whereas it can’t appear in English. And Korean ergative verbs have many onomatopoeic words but English counterparts don’t.
참고문헌 (24)
- 강은국, "조선어 문형 연구" (1993), 서광학술자료사
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2001
- 고영근, "능격성과 통사구조", 한글, 192, pp.43~76 (1986)
- 김두식, "영어문법론", pp.111~170 (2009), 종합출판
- 김문오, "자", 타동 양용동사의 범주와 문형, 1996, pp.57, 1~19
- 박승윤, "‘시작하다’ 동사의 타동성 예외", 언어, 9(2) (1984)
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 뿌리 깊은 나무
- 연재훈, "국어 중립동사 구문에 대한 연구", 한글, 203, pp.165~188 (1989)
- 연재훈, "한국어에 능격성이 존재하는가 -능격의 개념과 그 오용 -", 한글, (282), pp.125~154 (2008), 한글학회
- 우형식, "국어 타동구문 연구" (1996), 도서출판 박이정
- 이상억, "동사의 특성에 대한 이해: 사동 피동성을 중심으로", 어학연구, 8(2) (1972)
- 이은지, "Ergativity in Korean", 언어, 39(4), pp.945~969 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 윤만근, "생성통사론" (1996), 한국문화사
- 최동주, "국어 ‘능격성’ 논의의 문제점", 주시경학보, 3, pp.154~159 (1989)
- Burzio, Luigi., "Italian syntax" (1986), D. Reidel Publishing Company
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Dixon, R. M. W., "A semantic approach to English grammar" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Fagan, Sarah. M. B., "The English middle", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.181~203 (1988)
- Haspelmath, Martin., "Causatives and transitivity", pp.87~120 (1993), John Benjamins Publishing Co
- Keyser, Samuel J., "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.381~416 (1984)
- Kosofsky, David., "Common problems in Korean English" (2008), Foreign Language Company
- Levin, Beth., "English verb classes and alterations: A preliminary investigation" (1993), The University of Chicago Press
- Perlmutter, David M., "Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis", Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp.157~189 (1978)
- Shibatini, M., "Toward an understanding of the typology and function of case-marking", The Proceedings of the VIIIth International Congress of Linguistics, pp.42~58 (1982), CIPL