본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어와 한국어의 논항구조 구문 대조 연구

A Contrastive Study of English and Korean Argument Structure Constructions

정병철
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2020.12|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제95호|pp. 281-309

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

구문(construction)논항구조 구문(Argument Structure Construction)구문문법(Construction Grammar)논항구조(Argument Structure)끼워 맞추기(Coercion)
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper aims to propose a contrastive analysis of English and Korean argument structure constructions (ASCs) in the framework of Construction Grammar. Although Construction Grammar is best known for its thesis that ASCs can exist independently of argument taking verbs in English, it has yet to be investigated whether the equivalent patterns of argument structures or ASCs are available in Korean. In order to find the equivalent patterns, the present paper examined 7 types of English ASCs (of Goldberg(1995, 2019)) and their Korean counterparts. As a result, it turned out that Korean equivalents of English examples of ASCs with coercion effects do not involve coercion effects. However, this does not indicate that Korean ASCs can not exist independently of argument taking verbs because it is observed that transitive construction exceptionally produces coercion effects, and case marking postpositions and verb endings are playing a pivotal role in the emergence of ASCs and other constructions in Korean.

Abstract

This paper aims to propose a contrastive analysis of English and Korean argument structure constructions (ASCs) in the framework of Construction Grammar. Although Construction Grammar is best known for its thesis that ASCs can exist independently of argument taking verbs in English, it has yet to be investigated whether the equivalent patterns of argument structures or ASCs are available in Korean. In order to find the equivalent patterns, the present paper examined 7 types of English ASCs (of Goldberg(1995, 2019)) and their Korean counterparts. As a result, it turned out that Korean equivalents of English examples of ASCs with coercion effects do not involve coercion effects. However, this does not indicate that Korean ASCs can not exist independently of argument taking verbs because it is observed that transitive construction exceptionally produces coercion effects, and case marking postpositions and verb endings are playing a pivotal role in the emergence of ASCs and other constructions in Korean.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 양현권, "주요 문장 유형으로서의 영어 자동구동사 구문: 영어 학습과 교육에의 함의", The SNU Journal of Education Research, 27(3), pp.97~115 (2018), 교육종합연구원
  2. 정병철, "경험적 상관성에 기반한 동사의 의미 확장", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.209~239 (2007), 한국어의미학회
  3. 정병철, "한국어 동사와 문장 패턴의 상호작용", 언어과학연구, (69), pp.285~314 (2014), 언어과학회
  4. 정주리, "구성문법적 접근에 의한 문장 의미 연구", 한국어학, 12, pp.279~307 (2000)
  5. 정주리, "'가다' 동사의 의미와 구문에 대한 구문문법적 접근", 한국어 의미학, 17, pp.267~294 (2005), 한국어의미학회
  6. Behrens, Heike, "Usage-Based and Emergentist Approaches to Language Acquisition", Linguistics, 47(2), pp.383~411 (2009)
  7. Bencini, Giulia M. L., "The Contribution of Argument Structure Constructions to Sentence Meaning", Journal of Memory and Language, 43(4), pp.640~651 (2000)
  8. Broccias, Cristiano, "The English Change Network" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  11. Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of Language : Its Nature, Origin, and Use" (1986), Praeger Publishers
  12. Croft, William, "Radical Construction Grammar" (2001), Oxford University Press
  13. Dirven, René, "Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics" (2004), John Benjamins
  14. Elman, Jeffrey L., "Rethinking Innateness : A Connectionist Perspective on Development" (1996), MIT Press
  15. Fillmore, Charles, "Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions : The Case of Let Alone", Language, 64, pp.501~538 (1988)
  16. Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  17. Goldberg, Adele E, "Constructions at Work : The Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  18. Goldberg, Adele E, "The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar", pp.15~31 (2013), Oxford University Press
  19. Goldberg, Adele E, "Argument Structure Constructions vs. Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates", Mind and Language, 28(4), pp.435~450 (2013)
  20. Goldberg, Adele E, "Explain Me This" (2019), Princeton University Press
  21. Goldberg, Adele E., "The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions", Language, 80, pp.532~568 (2004)
  22. Gries, Stefan Th., "Do Foreign Language Learners Also Have Constructions? Evidence from Priming, Sorting and Corpora", Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, pp.182~200 (2005)
  23. Hilpert, Martin, "Construction Grammar and its Application to English" (2019), Edinburgh University Press
  24. Horita, Yuko, "A Cognitive Study of Resultative Constructions in English", English Linguistics, 12, pp.147~172 (1995)
  25. Horrocks, Geoffrey, "Generative Grammar" (1986), Longman
  26. Huddleston, Rodney, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  27. Langacker, Ronald, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1 and 2" (1987), Stanford University Press
  28. Levin, Beth, "English Verb Classes and Alternations : A Preliminary Investigation" (1993), The University of Chicago Press
  29. Lieven, Elena, "Constructions, Collocations, Patters", pp.1~24 (2014), de Gruyter Mouton
  30. Macwhinney, Brian, "The Emergence of Language", Annual Review of Psychology, 49, pp.199~227 (1998)
  31. Matthews, Peter H, "Syntax" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  32. Michaelis, Laura A, "Cognitive Perspectives on Lexical Semantics", pp.163~209 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  33. O’Grady, William D, "The Derived Intransitive Construction in English", Lingua, 52, pp.57~72 (1980)
  34. Onions, Charles T, "An Advanced English Syntax, Based on the Principles and Requirements of the Grammatical Society" (1904), Swan Sonnenschein and Co
  35. Pinker, Steven, "Learnability and Cognition : The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
  36. Shin, Gyu-ho, "On the Effectiveness of Argument Structure Constructions and Basic Verbs on Adult Korean Learners of English", Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Construction Grammar (2012)
  37. Sung, Min-Chang, "Applied Construction Grammar", pp.89~114 (2016), De Gruyter Mouton
  38. Tomasello, Michael, "Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition" (2003), Harvard University Press

관련 논문AI추천

영어와 한국어 삼항 술어 구문 비교 분석박기성한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2009 · 제16권 제3호국어와 영어 결과문탁기현대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2012 · 제54권 제2호Two Types of Korean Light Verb Constructions조윤경21세기영어영문학회 · 영어영문학212018 · 제31권 제1호Korean Serial Verb Constructions: A Construction-Based Approach정찬, 김종복한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2008 · 제18권 제4호Intransitive ca-verbs in Korean are Unergatives정현경, 최재훈한국언어학회 · 언어2021 · 제46권 제3호한국어 타동성 처소교체 구문에 대한 중국인 학습자의 논항 구조 인식 연구박선희한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2014 · 제21권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)

스마트폰 어휘 앱을 활용한 어휘학습과 토익향상과의 관계길인숙pp. 1-20Effects of Writing Anxiety and Grammatical Complexity on Raising L2 Written Accuracy through Corrective Feedback장성수pp. 21-46한국에서의 성별 스테레오타입의 역동성 인식 양상권영수pp. 47-67A Corpus-Based Study on Figure Precedence in English Complex Sentence이미경pp. 69-86영어 제외의미 표현 but과 but for의 비교 분석안병길, 김대영pp. 87-109
원문 보기