1980년대 이후 한국 법철학에 관한 연구 -이론과 쟁점을 중심으로-
A Study on the Korean Law & Philosophy After 1980
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines the accomplishment and assignment of the Korean law & philosopy(KLP) after 1980, especially its theoris and issues. To the mid 1980's, KLP hadn't developed excellently under a military dictatorship. Since 1987's democracy movement, KLP has fostered very quickly. Korean Association of Legal Philosophy, Korean Law & Society Association and Democratic Legal Studies Association have contributed to the KLP's development. They have studied the legal positivism, the theory of natural law, law & society, the legal culture studis, the radical theoy of law, the applied legal philosophy, the legal theoy, the postmodernism jurispudence, Luman's system theory and so on. Through these researches, they have wanted to realize a society of justice. They have strived for the solution to the recent social problem, for example, the medical-pharmaceutical dispute, the various NIMBI insistences, the female equality, the foreign workers problem, the environmental issues, the intellectual property law disputes as well as the democratic issues. And for the reflection to these hard cases, they have accomodated the theoris of Hart, Dworkin, Fuller, Radbruch, Habermas, Alexy and so on. They have been disposed to intergrate the inclusive legal positivism, Dworkin's legal principle theory, Radbruch's latter theory, and Alexy's optimum theory. Although KLP has meeted with many difficulties since 1980's, KLP has expanded the KLP's discoursive places. They have made efforts to discuss with lawyers, professors, and specialists. And they must persevere in their endeavors to the reproduction of law and philosophical discourses in Korean legal culture.
Abstract
This article examines the accomplishment and assignment of the Korean law & philosopy(KLP) after 1980, especially its theoris and issues. To the mid 1980's, KLP hadn't developed excellently under a military dictatorship. Since 1987's democracy movement, KLP has fostered very quickly. Korean Association of Legal Philosophy, Korean Law & Society Association and Democratic Legal Studies Association have contributed to the KLP's development. They have studied the legal positivism, the theory of natural law, law & society, the legal culture studis, the radical theoy of law, the applied legal philosophy, the legal theoy, the postmodernism jurispudence, Luman's system theory and so on. Through these researches, they have wanted to realize a society of justice. They have strived for the solution to the recent social problem, for example, the medical-pharmaceutical dispute, the various NIMBI insistences, the female equality, the foreign workers problem, the environmental issues, the intellectual property law disputes as well as the democratic issues. And for the reflection to these hard cases, they have accomodated the theoris of Hart, Dworkin, Fuller, Radbruch, Habermas, Alexy and so on. They have been disposed to intergrate the inclusive legal positivism, Dworkin's legal principle theory, Radbruch's latter theory, and Alexy's optimum theory. Although KLP has meeted with many difficulties since 1980's, KLP has expanded the KLP's discoursive places. They have made efforts to discuss with lawyers, professors, and specialists. And they must persevere in their endeavors to the reproduction of law and philosophical discourses in Korean legal culture.
참고문헌 (26)
- 심헌섭, "법철학", pp.17~ (1982), 법문사
- 김정오, "법과 철학의 교차로에서", 철학과 현실, 35, pp.255~ (1997)
- 박은정, "한국 법철학의 반성과 과제", 법과사회, pp.197~ (1994)
- 심헌섭, "법철학", pp.173~175 (1996), 방송통신대학출판부
- 강진철, "서평: 5․18, 이 시대 법과 역사의 화두", 법과사회, 13, pp.308~ (1996)
- 심헌섭, "켈젠법이론 선집", pp.10~ (1990), 법문사
- 심재우, "법치주의와 계몽적 자연법", 법철학연구, 1, pp.27~28 (2002)
- 박은정, "자연법사상", pp.272~284 (1987), 민음사
- 민주주의법학연구회, "연구회 발족선언문", 민주법학, (창간), pp.159~ (1989)
- 강경선, "해석과 변혁", 민주법학, (3), pp.17~21 (1989)
- 강경선, "진보법학의 개념정립을 위한 몇 가지 질문들", 민주법학, (6), pp.295~296 (1993)
- Pyong-choon Hahm, "The Traditional Patterns of Authoritative Symbols and the Judicial Process in Korea: A Study in Legal Culture and Legal Development", pp.174~177 (1983), Yonsei University Press
- 양건, "한국에서의 ‘법과 사회’ 연구", 법과 사회, (창간) (1998)
- 양건, "한국과 일본간 의 비교법문화론을 위한 서설: 함병춘과 가아시마 다케요시를 넘어서", 저스티스, 34(1) (2001)
- 이철우, "법문화의 담론적 생산: 방법론적 비판", 법철학연구, 4(1) (2001)
- 김정오, "한국의 법문화: 인식, 구조, 변화" (2006), 나남
- 함재봉, "탈근대와 유교: 한국정치담론의 모색" (1998), 나남출판
- 최종고, "동아시아보통법론―한, 중, 일 법사의 기본과제", 법학, 40(2) (2000), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 한국법철학회, "응용법철학", pp.7~8 (2002), 아카넷
- 박은정, "5․18. 법적 책임과 역사적 책임" (1995), 이화여대 출판부
- 한국법철학회, "법치국가와 시민불복종" (2001), 법문사
- 박은정, "사법적 법실천과 법개념", 법철학연구, 3(1), pp.59~ (2000)
- 김도균, "자연법론적 승인률 모델의 가능성", 법철학연구, 3(1) (2000)
- 김도균, "자연법론적 승인율의 필연성에 대하여", 법철학연구, 4(1) (2001)
- 오병선, "제도적 자연법과 법의 해석", 법철학연구, 5(1), pp.83~114 (2002), 한국법철학회
- 오병선, "특별좌담: 20세기의 법철학, 회고와 전망", 법철학연구, 3(1), pp.18~20 (2000)