전도서 5장의 신학적 읽기: 주석과 메시지
The Theological Reading of Ecclesiastes 5: Exegesis and Message
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 글은 신학교의 교단과 교회의 강단 사이에의 괴리 문제의 실마리를 성서에 대한 신학적 주석에서 찾으려고 시도한다. 신학적 주석은 본문의 형성과정보다는 최종형태에 주목하고, 당시(최종편집자)의 의미를 규명하고 더불어 오늘의 메시지를 도출하려는 해석학적 시도이다. 이 글은 특히 이해하기 어려운 개념과 단락들로 채워져 있는 전도서 5장을 주석하고, 설교의 현장에서 활용할 수 있는 메시지를 도출하는 것을 목적으로 삼는다.
Abstract
It is not new that there is a gap between the theological education at school or seminary and the teaching in church. Now, biblical scholars at seminary should avoid pedantic studies of the Scripture. Also, pastors in church, who close their mind to the teachings from theological schools have to stay away from subjective and arbitrary misinterpretation of the Scripture. Mutual respect and understanding between theology(academic field) and the teaching of pious life(church) are the most urgent tasks to achieve. This essay will try to find a clue of this problem in the theological exegesis of the Scripture. Theological exegesis is a hermeneutic attempt not only to investigate and reveal the original meaning of the text(the final editor) at the historical time, but also to draw messages for today, focusing on the final form of the text rather than its formation process. This essay will interpret Ecclesiastes Chapter 5 which includes particularly incomprehensible concepts and paragraphs. Furthermore, this essay will derive a message that can be used for preaching in church. The contents of Ecc 5: 1-7 is about 'the criticism of the existing religious reality.' Verse 2 stresses on the absolute sovereignty of God rather than indifference of God. Verse 6 is interpreted as the prohibition on the abuse of 'mistake (Schegaga) of worship.' The word, 'fear of God,' in verse 7 acknowledges that God is not controlled by human beings. Ecc 5:8-9 is notorious for its barely understandable text (crux interpretum). The essay interprets verse 8a as 'Qoheleth's observation,' and verses 8b-9 as 'a response of a supporter of the established order.' Particularly, verse 9 is regarded as a slogan for supporting legitimacy of the government structure at that time. This paragraph, especially, is analyzed as the criticism of social reality, pointing to the mechanism of concealment that can be found in the leadership. Ecc 5:10-12 deals with 'the double-sided wealth' or 'dangerousness of wealth.' This verses show a concept different from 'the concept of the joy of idleness'(dolce far niente). This means that 'wealth without labor' is no value to seek. Ecc 5:13-17 concerns 'the sudden loss of wealth.' The word, "to their hurt,"(leraato) in verse 13 is interpreted as 'for their hurt'(the preparation for unhappiness) and "to their hurt"(the loss of wealth). Also, as many scholars insist, verse 15 is analyzed as 'the loss of one's whole fortune' rather than 'the sudden death of the rich.'Ecc 5:18-20 deals with 'the present of God and enjoyment' in response. "Enjoyment" (happiness) in verse 18 is not in 'possession of property,' but in 'enjoying property.' "Their lot" in verse 19 does not mean 'acquisition of property,' rather 'the experience of enjoyment.' Also, 'God's response' in verse 20 is regarded as 'God's revelation.' The four times mentioning of God's name in this paragraph could reveal the characters of God: First, God is the giver of limited life(Ecc 5:18). Second, God is the granter of property and wealth(Ecc 5:19a). Third, God is the one who can enable enjoyment(Ecc 5:19b). God is the one who works in certain ways for the sake of human beings' experience of enjoyment(Ecc 5:20).
참고문헌 (41)
- 게제니우스, "히브리어 아람어 사전" (2007), 생명의말씀사
- 김영진, "삶의 의미를 찾아서" (2008), 이레서원
- 전도서(국제성서주석, "잠언", pp.1992, 링그렌
- 머피, "전도서(WBC 성경주석)" (2008), 솔로몬
- 아가(대한기독교서회 창립 100주년기념 성서주석, "전도서", pp.2009, 민영진
- 박준서, "고대 이스라엘의 지혜운동", 구약논단, 8, pp.133~149 (2000)
- 브라운, "전도서(현대성서주석" (2006), 한국장로교출판사
- 유윤종, "전도서 안의 창세기", 구약논단, 7, pp.95~118 (1999)
- 이성훈, "전도서 어떻게 설교할 것인가(두란노 HOW주석" (2009), 두란노아카데미
- 천사무엘, "잠언 연구의 주요 해석학적 과제들", 구약논단, 14(4), pp.147~166 (2008), 한국구약학회
- Backhaus, F. J, "Denn Zeit und Zufall trifft sie alle: Studien zur Komposition und zum Gottesbild im Buch Qohelet", Anton Hain (1993), Anton Hain
- Bonora, A, "Guide Spirituali all`Antico Testamento" (1992), Città Nuova
- Buhlman, A, "The Difficulty of Thinking in Greek and Speaking in Hebrew (Qoheleth 3: 18; 4: 13-16; 5: 8)", JSOT, 90, pp.101~108 (2000)
- Crenshaw, J. L, "Ecclesiastes, A Commentary" (1987), Westminster
- Fox,M.V, "Ecclesiastes", The Jewish Publication Society (2004), The Jewish Publication Society
- Fredericks, D. C, "Chiasm and Parallel Structure in Qoheleth 5:9-6:9", JBL, (108), pp.17~35 (1989)
- Galling, K, "Der Prediger: Die Fünf Megilloth", pp.73~125
- Garrett, D. A, "Qoheleth on the Use and Abuse of Political Power", Trinity Journal, 8, pp.159~177 (1987)
- Gordis, R, "Koheleth-The Man and his World. A Study of Ecclesiastes", Schocken (1968)
- Hieke, T, "Wie hast Du`s mit der Relegion?: Sprechhandlungen und Wirkintentionen in Kohelet 4,17-5,6", pp.319~338 (1998), Leuven Unversity Press
- Knohl, I, "Betweem Voice and Silence: The Relationship between Prayer and Temple Cult", JBL, 115, pp.17~30 (1996)
- Krüger, T, "Das Gute und die Güter: Erwägungen zu Bedeutung von בוט und הבוט im Qoheletbuch", ThZ, 53, pp.53~63 (1997)
- Krüger, T, "Kohelet", Biblischer Kommentar Altes Testament (2000), Neukirchener Verlag
- Kugel, J. L, "Qohelet and Money", CBQ, 51, pp.32~49 (1989)
- Lauha, A, "Kohelet" (1978), Neukirchener Verlag
- Lohfink, N, "Warum ist der Tor unfähig, böse zu handeln? (Koh 4,17)", ZDMG.S, 5, pp.113~120 (1983)
- Lohfink, N, "Kohelet und die Banken: Zur Übersetzung von Kohelet 5,12-16", VT, 39, pp.488~495 (1989)
- Lohfink, N, "Qoheleth 5:17-19: Revelation by Joy", CBQ, 52, pp.625~635 (1990)
- Lohfink, N, "Kohelet", Echter Verlag
- Lohfink,N, "Qoheleth.A Continental Commentary.Translated by Sean McEvenue" (2003), Fortress Press
- Longman III,T, "The Book of Ecclesiastes(The New International Commen-tary on the Old Testament)" (1998), Eerdmans
- Michel,D, "Untersuchungen zur Eigenart des Buches Qohelet.Mit einem Anhang von Reinhard G.Lehmann:Bibliographie zu Qohelet(BZAW 183)" (1989), de Gruyter
- Ogden, G. S, "Translation Problems in Ecclesiastes 5.13-17", BiTr, 39, pp.423~428 (1989)
- Otto,R, "The Idea of the Holy" (1969), Oxford University Press
- Rostovtzeff, M, "Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte der hellenistischen Welt, Band 1" (1955), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
- Rüdiger, L, "‘Denn es ist kein Mensch so gerecht auf Erden, daß er nur Gutes tue ...’: Recht und Gerechtigkeit aus der Sicht des Predigers Salomo", ZThK, 94, pp.263~287 (1997)
- Schwienhorst-Schönberger,L, "Kohelet" (2004), Verlag Herder
- Seow,C.-L, "Ecclesiastes.A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary(AB 18C)" (1997), Doubleday
- Tita, H, "Ist die thematische Einheit Koh 4,17-5,6 eine Anspielung auf die Salomoerzählung? Aporien der religionskritischen Interpretation", BN, 85, pp.87~102 (1996)
- Vonach,A, "Nähere Dich um zu hören: Gottesvorstellungen und Glaubens- vermittlung im Koheletbuch" (1999), Philo
- Whybray,R.N, "Ecclesiastes" (1989), Eerdmans