The Internet of Things : A New Paradigm for Regulation?
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
IoT is highly diverse and open to different application field. Consequently, it cannot be reduced to one specific technology. Rather, it encompasses various technical solutions which enable the identification of objects and which collect, store, process and transfer data not only in physical environments but also between physical contexts and virtual worlds. Interoperability between the all the components’ systems creates a great deal of complexity. The major concern is thus how to improve and better connect and integrate existing technologies. These generic features naturally weigh on the characteristics to be expected from regulation of the IoT. They include, first, the identification of some major guidelines requested by. Secondly, they address specific decisions related to more general technological regulation (spectrum management or FttH architecture, for instance). From a more general perspective, the process assumes a shift from ‘reactive’ regulation (whether ex ante or ex post, symmetric or asymmetric) to ‘proactive’ one. It is less about defining the architecture of the rollout of settled technologies (and the corresponding competitive issues between incumbents), than anticipating the emergence of a massive deep-emerging sector with significant impacts on the economy of electronic communications. In this context of rapid technological progress, opening markets to competition acted as a clear driving force. Far from impeding innovation development, regulating the sector actually served as something of a neutral arbitrator for technological developments, if not actually a breeding ground for them.
Abstract
IoT is highly diverse and open to different application field. Consequently, it cannot be reduced to one specific technology. Rather, it encompasses various technical solutions which enable the identification of objects and which collect, store, process and transfer data not only in physical environments but also between physical contexts and virtual worlds. Interoperability between the all the components’ systems creates a great deal of complexity. The major concern is thus how to improve and better connect and integrate existing technologies. These generic features naturally weigh on the characteristics to be expected from regulation of the IoT. They include, first, the identification of some major guidelines requested by. Secondly, they address specific decisions related to more general technological regulation (spectrum management or FttH architecture, for instance). From a more general perspective, the process assumes a shift from ‘reactive’ regulation (whether ex ante or ex post, symmetric or asymmetric) to ‘proactive’ one. It is less about defining the architecture of the rollout of settled technologies (and the corresponding competitive issues between incumbents), than anticipating the emergence of a massive deep-emerging sector with significant impacts on the economy of electronic communications. In this context of rapid technological progress, opening markets to competition acted as a clear driving force. Far from impeding innovation development, regulating the sector actually served as something of a neutral arbitrator for technological developments, if not actually a breeding ground for them.
참고문헌 (45)
- ARCEP, "Utilisation de fréquences sur des « bandes libres » et projet de décision de l’ARCEP relatif aux dispositifs à courte portée", Synthèse de la consultation publique, ~ (2014)
- "Réguler pour connecter, Annual Report" (2015)[URL]
- "Revue Stratégique, Janvier" (2016)[URL]
- Atzori, L., "The Internet of Things: A survey", Computer Networks, 54(15), pp.2787~2805 (2010)
- "Big Business Fail: Makers and Startups are The Ones Shaping the Internet of Things" (2014)[URL]
- "The Internet of Things: What challenges for Europe?" (2009)[URL]
- Project Advanced connectivity of devices, systems and services (M2M), "BEREC", ~, pp.Draft Report on Enabling the Internet of Things BoR (15) 141 (2015)
- Ubiquitous, secure internet-of-things with location and context-awareness, "Butler", ~ (2014)
- "IP for Smart Objects, Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, White Paper #1" (2008)[URL]
- Eeten, M. Van, "Emerging Threats to Internet Security: Incentives, Externalities and Policy Implications", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(4), pp.221~232 (2009)
- "Recent Developments on the Internet of Things, Opinion 8/2014, Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party Adopted on 16 September 2014, 14/EN WP 223" (2014)[URL]
- "Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive" (2015)[URL]
- "Internet of Things, Privacy & Security in a Connected World, Staff Report" (2015)[URL]
- Gawer, A., "Platforms, Markets, and Innovation", pp.416~ (2009), Edward Elgar Publishing
- Gershenfeld N., "The internet of things", Scientific American, 291(4), pp.76~81 (2004)
- Gershenfeld, N., "As Objects Go Online: The Promise (and pitfalls) of the Internet of Things", Foreign Affairs, 93(2), pp.60~67 (2014)
- Gomez, J., "Interaction System Based on Internet of Things as Support for Education", Procedia Computer Science, 21, pp.132~139 (2013)
- Gubbia, J., "Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions", Future Generation Computer Systems, 29, pp.1645~1660 (2013)
- The Internet of Things is already here, but who bears the risks? A model to explain coverage disputes in a world of interconnected, autonomous devices, "Haas, A.", World Risk and Insurance Economics Congress, ~ (2015)
- Hagel, J., "The Power of Pull: How Small Moves, Smartly Made, Can Set Big Things in Motion", pp.288~ (2009), Basic Books
- Hofmann, A., "Interdependent risk networks: the threat of cyber-attack", International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 11(5, pp.6) (2011), 312~323
- "Big data et objets connectés : Faire de la France un champion de la révolution numérique Report" (2015)[URL]
- Regulation and the Internet of Things, "ITU", GSR, ~ (2015)
- lansiti, M., "Digital Ubiquity: How Connections, Sensors, and Data Are Revolutionizing Business", Harvard Business Review (2014)
- Leminen, S., "Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networking - Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7469", pp.15~26 (2012), Springer
- Madakam, S., "Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review", Journal of Computer and Communications, 3, pp.164~173 (2015)[DOI]
- Mazhelis, O., "Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networking - Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7469", pp.1~14 (2012), Springer
- Ngai, E., "RFID research: An academic literature review (1995-2005) and future research directions", International Journal of Production Economics, 112, pp.510~520 (2008)
- Nokia, "Optimizing LTE for the Internet of Things, Nokia LTE M2M White paper" (2015)
- OFCOM, "More Radio Spectrum for the Internet of Things, Consultation", ~ (2015)
- OFCOM, "Promoting investment and innovation in the Internet of Things", Summary of responses and next steps Statement, ~ (2015)
- "The Internet of Things : Disrupting Traditional Business Models" (2015)[URL]
- "The Internet of Things Will Thrive by 2025" (2014)[URL]
- Porter, M.E., "How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition", Harvard Business Review (2014)
- Presser, M., "The Internet of Things: Connecting the Real World with the Digital World", The Magazine for Telecom Insiders, 2 (2009)
- Preuverneers, D., "The Internet of Things. From RFID to the Next- Generation Pervasive Networked Systems", pp.287~307 (2008), Auerbach Publications
- Rochet, J.C., "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets", Journal of the European Economic Association (2003)
- Santucci, G., "From Internet of Data to Internet of Things", International Conference on Future Trends of the Internet (2009)
- Stiglitz, J., "Austrian Ministry for Economic Affairs and Labour" (2002), Economic policy Center
- Internet of Things: The Complete Reimaginative Force, "TCS", Global Trend Study, ~ (2015)
- Uckelmann, D., "Architecting the Internet of Things", pp.1~24 (2011), Springer
- Weber, R., "Internet of things-Need for a new legal environment?", Computer Law & Security Review, 25, pp.522~527 (2009)
- Westerlund, M., "Designing Business Models for the Internet of Things", Technology Innovation Management Review (2014)
- World Economic Forum, "Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected Products and Services", ~ (2015)
- A Survey of the Internet of Things, "Yang, F. -L.", ~ (2010)