What is the appropriate Policy Direction to developInternet of Things?
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to make a research on the basic direction of development in IOT. For this purpose, the concept, the prospect, and the importance of IoT are analyzed. The three important sectors for IoT diffusion are human, factories and cities. Among them, factories are found to be a most important one, indicating rapid innovation of manufacturing. Finally, considering value chain structure of IoT and convergence of technologies in the digital economy, the following policy recommendations are proposed. First, it is better for economic actors to focus on the hardware sector of IoT in the initial stage, but focus on the software sector such as services based on big data, later. Second, it is desirable to promote and take advantage of the phenomenon of convergence in the digital economy. When considering the time horizon, the first recommendation can be regarded as an advice based on short time period, but the second one on the long time. In the initial stage of IoT, policies of Korean government has been evaluated as good, but need to pay more attention to the areas of software and convergence technology.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to make a research on the basic direction of development in IOT. For this purpose, the concept, the prospect, and the importance of IoT are analyzed. The three important sectors for IoT diffusion are human, factories and cities. Among them, factories are found to be a most important one, indicating rapid innovation of manufacturing. Finally, considering value chain structure of IoT and convergence of technologies in the digital economy, the following policy recommendations are proposed. First, it is better for economic actors to focus on the hardware sector of IoT in the initial stage, but focus on the software sector such as services based on big data, later. Second, it is desirable to promote and take advantage of the phenomenon of convergence in the digital economy. When considering the time horizon, the first recommendation can be regarded as an advice based on short time period, but the second one on the long time. In the initial stage of IoT, policies of Korean government has been evaluated as good, but need to pay more attention to the areas of software and convergence technology.
참고문헌 (14)
- ITU Internet Reports 2005: The Internet of Things, "ITU", ITU, ~ (2005)
- KISDI, "2015 ICT Industry Outlook of Korea", ~ (2014)
- OECD, "OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015", OECD, ~ (2015)
- Gartner, "Forecast: Internet of Things, Endpoints and Associated Services Worldwide", Gartner, ~ (2014)
- Mckinsey & Company, "The Internet of Things: Mapping the value beyond the Hype", ~ (2015)
- OECD, "Machine-to-Machine Communications", ~ (2012)
- The Policy Implication for Development of IoT, "KIET", KIET, ~, pp.Issue Paper 2014-342 (2014)
- 정우수, "사물인터넷 산업의 경제적 파급효과 분석", 인터넷정보학회논문지, 14(5), pp.119~128 (2013), 한국인터넷정보학회[DOI]
- Kim, Gi-Hong, "Digital Economy 3.0" (2013), Bobmunsa
- Bae, Soo-hyun, "The Necessity of the development of IoT for Busan", BDI, ~ (2015)
- Can the Internet of Everything Bring Back the High-Growth Economy?, "Mandel, Michael", progressive policy institute, ~ (2013)
- Cisco, "Embracing the Internet of Everything To capture your share of $14,4 trillion", ~ (2013)
- Ha, Won-Kyu, "The fourth Industrial Revolution and major Countries’ Preparations", Weekly Technology Review, KISDI, ~ (2015)