본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Complexity and Diversity of Internet Infrastructure: Considering the “Fair Share” Policy Proposals

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The main thing about the Internet is that no network or its operator has a more significant role in the entire ecosystem; the idea is that as more networks connect with one another, they become more valuable themselves and they add more value to the Internet overall. Interconnection is the process that facilitates all different networks to become a single one ensuring that each device can talk to every other device connected to the Internet. Unlike in the case of telecommunication networks and termination monopolies, the benefit of interconnection is that it does not require any regulation to ensure that barriers to entry remain low; the only requirement is that of collaboration, which happens seamlessly and without any bureaucratic regulatory intervention. Interconnection truly places the word ‘inter’ in the Internet. Reconstructing, therefore, this normative framework will not come without some, possible irreversible, consequences. Once regulation is in place that recognizes access networks as more prolific and rewards them with monopoly rights, the disruption of the entire system of trust relationships that have been built over the years in the Internet will be inevitable; from one day to the next, the Internet, renowned for its agility and constantly evolving nature, will become more cumbersome, more static and less resilient, much like telecommunication networks are. The aim of this article is to spell out the core issues with all these policy proposals on network fees and, then, focus on the polymorphous structure and dynamic character of the Internet’s infrastructure.

Abstract

The main thing about the Internet is that no network or its operator has a more significant role in the entire ecosystem; the idea is that as more networks connect with one another, they become more valuable themselves and they add more value to the Internet overall. Interconnection is the process that facilitates all different networks to become a single one ensuring that each device can talk to every other device connected to the Internet. Unlike in the case of telecommunication networks and termination monopolies, the benefit of interconnection is that it does not require any regulation to ensure that barriers to entry remain low; the only requirement is that of collaboration, which happens seamlessly and without any bureaucratic regulatory intervention. Interconnection truly places the word ‘inter’ in the Internet. Reconstructing, therefore, this normative framework will not come without some, possible irreversible, consequences. Once regulation is in place that recognizes access networks as more prolific and rewards them with monopoly rights, the disruption of the entire system of trust relationships that have been built over the years in the Internet will be inevitable; from one day to the next, the Internet, renowned for its agility and constantly evolving nature, will become more cumbersome, more static and less resilient, much like telecommunication networks are. The aim of this article is to spell out the core issues with all these policy proposals on network fees and, then, focus on the polymorphous structure and dynamic character of the Internet’s infrastructure.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "Here’s how the European Commission proposal to force websites to pay ISPs violates net neutrality" (2023)[URL]
  2. "Comments to the European Commission’s Exploratory Consultation on Mandated Network Access Fees" (2023)[URL]
  3. Barbara van Schewick, "Towards an economic framework for network neutrality regulation", Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 5 (2007)
  4. Brett M. Frischmann, "Infrastructure: The social value of shared resources" (2012), Oxford Publishing
  5. "The European Commission puts an end to competition in telecoms" (2023)[URL]
  6. "The fair share repository" (2023)[URL]
  7. "The Global Trend that Could Kill the Internet: Sender Party Network Pays" (2022)[URL]
  8. "Internet collapse made in Europe: The Commission’s misguided desire to undo decades of an open Internet" (2023)[URL]
  9. "Michael Nelson, Afterword: Korea’s challenge to the standard Internet interconnection model" (2021)[URL]
  10. "Africa Practice and Genesis Analytics, Equiano Subsea Cable: Regional Economic Impact Assessment" (2021)[URL]
  11. "The impact of tech companies’ network investment on the economics of broadband ISPs" (2022)[URL]
  12. "Competitive conditions on transit and peering markets, Implications for European digital sovereignty" (2022)[URL]
  13. "BEREC’s comments on the ETNO proposal for ITU/WCIT or similar initiatives along these lines (BoR (12) 120 rev.1)"[URL]
  14. "BEREC preliminary assessment of the underlying assumptions of payments from large CAPs to ISPs" (2022)[URL]
  15. "Google’s Hyperscale Data Centers and Infrastructure Ecosystem in Europe" (2019)[URL]
  16. "Connectivity Infrastructure and the Open Internet: BEUC preliminary position on possible introduction of network infrastructure fees" (2022)[URL]
  17. "ETNO paper on Contribution to WCIT: ITRs proposal to address new Internet ecosystem" (2012)[URL]
  18. "Report on consultancy study on issues relating to the landing of submarine cables in Hong Kong" (2010)[URL]
  19. "Fostering investment in infrastructure: Lessons learned from OECD investment policy reviews" (2015)[URL]
  20. OECD, "The operators and their future: The state of play and emerging business models" (2019), OECD Publishing
  21. "Preqin Global Infrastructure report" (2020)[URL]
  22. "The Impact of Facebook U.S. Data Center Fleet" (2020)[URL]
  23. "Regulation (EU) 2015", 2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002, EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531, pp.2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union
  24. "ANATEL initiates Request for Comments to address a future regulation of digital platforms and the need for “fair share”" (2023)[URL]
  25. "Indian operators weigh in on “fair share” debate, Total Telecom Congress" (2022)[URL]
  26. "Technology Stocks: 10 biggest companies in 2023" (2023)[URL]
  27. "Will there be fees for online service firms in Vietnam?" (2023)[URL]
  28. "Internet Society’s submission to the European Commission’s exploratory consultation on “The future of the electronics communications sector and its infrastructure”" (2023)[URL]
  29. "Doing our part: How Google’s network helps internet content reach users" (2022)[URL]
  30. "Caribbean telecoms operators seek to deepen their monopoly strangleholds" (2023)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)