본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제도적 동형화와 상징적 동조: 연봉제의 사례

Institutional Isomorphism and Symbolism: The Case of Performance Based Pay in Korean Firms

0

조회

0

다운로드

51

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

노동부의 2004년 연봉제․성과배분제 실태조사와 한국노동연구원의 2004년 사업체패널조사를 결합한 자료를 사용하여 연봉제 도입에 있어서 상징적 동조의 선행요인을 분석하였다. 제도화 이론에 의하면 동형화 압력에 의해 제도화된 관행을 도입하는 경우 관행은 도입하지만 실제로는 실행하지 않는 상징적 동조(decoupling) 현상이 발생할 수 있다. 분석 결과 정부의 강압적 동형화 압력의 지표인 공공부문은 연봉제 도입과 유의한 정(+)의 관계를 보였지만 상징적 동조의 두 가지 지표와도 유의한 정(+)의 관계를 보였다. 강압적 동형화의 또 다른 지표인 기업집단 소속 계열사는 연봉제 도입과 유의한 정(+)의 관계를 보였지만 예상과는 정반대로 상징적 동조의 세 가지 지표와는 유의한 부(-)의 관계를 보였다. 규범적 동형화의 지표인 경영자단체/협회 가입은 상징적 동조의 한 지표와 유의한 정(+)의 관계가 나타났으며, 후발 도입 변수는 상징적 동조의 한 지표와 유의한 정(+)의 관계가 나타났다. 한편 제도적 동형화 압력의 효과와 대조하기 위해 살펴본 경영전략 변수는 상징적 동조와 정반대의 효과를 낳는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

Using workplace survey by Korean Labor Institute(2004) and wage survey by Ministry of Labor(2004), this study explores the antecedents of symbolic adoption in the case of performance based pay(PBP) in Korean firms. According to institutional theory institutional isomorphism especially coercive isomorphism may result in symbolic-ceremonial adoption or decoupling. Decoupling means that organizations adopt institutionalized practices but do not implement them or decouple the structure from actual activities. We found that public sector was positively related with both the adoption of PBP and two indicators of symbolic adoption. Business group affiliation was positively related with the adoption of PBP but contrary to our expectation this variable was negatively related with all indicators of symbolic adoption. Trade association, an indicator of normative isomorphism, was positively related with an indicator of symbolic adoption, and late adopter was positively related with an indicator of symbolic adoption. We tested the effect of business strategies which have been known to be the predictors of PBP and found that these strategies were negatively related with symbolic adoption of PBP.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김동배, "연봉 차등폭이 보상수준 만족에 미치는 영향", 노동정책연구, 8(4), pp.29~54 (2008), 한국노동연구원
  2. 김식현, "인사관리론" (1999), 무역경영사
  3. 연봉제·성과배분제 실태조사. 각년도, "노동부", ~
  4. 노용진, "혁신적 인사관리제도 도입의 영향요인", 경영학연구, 32(4), pp.955~981 (2003), 한국경영학회
  5. 배종석, "인적자원론" (2008), 홍문사
  6. 유규창, "연봉제의 도입과 효과에 관한 이론적 고찰", 인사조직연구, 7(2), pp.47~86 (1999)
  7. 유규창, "성과주의 인사제도의 도입 영향요인 및 조직성과", 인사·조직연구, 15(3), pp.187~224 (2007), 한국인사·조직학회
  8. 이홍, "한국 기업집단의 강제적 동질성을 수반한 모집단학습: 삼성그룹과 현대그룹의 비교", 경영과학, 17(1), pp.87~115 (2000)
  9. 기업내부노동시장의 변화, "정인수", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2002)
  10. Balkin, D. B., "Explaining Team-Based Pay: A contingency perspective based on the organizational life cycle, team design, and organizational learning literature", Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), pp.249~269 (2000)
  11. Bender, R., "Why Do Companies Use Performance-related Pay for Their Executive Directors?", Corporate Governance, 12(4), pp.521~533 (2004)
  12. Brown, C., "Firms Choice of Method of Pay", Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, pp.165S~182S (1990)
  13. Brown, M., "Performance Appraisal Systems: Determinants and change", British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(4), pp.659~679 (2005)
  14. Chang, S-J, "When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote firm Innovation? A tale of two emerging economics", Organization Science, 17(5), pp.637~656 (2006)
  15. Datta, D. K., "Human Resource Management and Labor Productivity: Does industry matter?", Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), pp.135~145 (2005)
  16. DiMaggio, P.J., "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field", American Sociological Review, 48, pp.147~160 (1983)
  17. Dirsmith, M. W., "Institutional Pressure and Symbolic Displays in a GAO Context", Organization Studies, 21(3), pp.515~537 (2000)
  18. Edelman, L.B., "Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structrues: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law", American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), pp.1531~1576 (1992)
  19. Eisenhardt, K.M., "Agency and Institutional Theory Explanations: The case of retail sales compensation", Academey of Management Journal, 31(3), pp.488~511 (1988)
  20. Fiss, P. C., "The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling", Academey of Management Journal, 49(6), pp.1173~11931 (2006)
  21. George, E., "Cognitive Underpinnings of Institutional Persistence and Change: A framing perspective", Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), pp.347~365 (2006)
  22. Heugens, P.P.M.A.R., "Structure! Agency!(and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization", Academy of Manaagment Journal, 52(1), pp.61~85 (2009)
  23. Kaufman, B. E., "Models of Union Wage Determination: What have we learned since Dunlop and Ross", Industrial Relations, 41(1), pp.110~158 (2002)
  24. Kostova, T., "Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and relational effects", Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp.215~233 (2002)
  25. Unions and Innovation: A survey and empirical evidence, "Menezes-Filho, N.", Center for Economic Policy Research, ~, pp.Working Paper No. 3792 (2003)
  26. Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp.340~363 (1977)
  27. Miceli, M. P., "Contextual Determinants of Variable Pay Plan Design: A proposed research framework", Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), pp.289~305 (2000)
  28. Milkovich, G. T., "Compensation" (2005), McGraw-Hill
  29. Montemayor, E. F., "Congruence Between Pay Policy and Competitive Strategy in High-Performing Firms", Journal of Management, 22(6), pp.889~908 (1996)
  30. Orton, J. D., "Loosely Coupled Systems: A reconceptualization", Academy of Management Review, 15(2), pp.203~223 (1990)
  31. Peterson, T., "Payment Systems and the Structure of Inequality: Conceptual issues and an analysis of sales persons in department stores", American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), pp.67~104 (1992)
  32. Scott, R., "Institutions and Organizations" (1995), Sage
  33. Souitaris, V., "Firm Specific Competencies Determining Technological Innovation: A survey in Greece", R&D Management, 32(1), pp.61~77 (2002)
  34. Tolbert, P. S., "Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: the Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880~1935", Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), pp.22~39 (1983)
  35. Tolbert, P.S., "The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. in: Handbook of Organization Studies", pp.175~190 (1996), Sage
  36. Tremblay, M., "Explaining Sales Pay Strategy Using Agency, Transaction Cost and Resource Dependency Theories", Journal of Management Studies, 40(7), pp.1651~1682 (2003)
  37. Westphal, J. D., "Substance and Symbolism in CEO's Long-term Incentive Plans", Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), pp.367~390 (1994)
  38. Westphal, J. D., "The Symbolic Management of Stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions", Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), pp.127~153 (1998)
  39. Westphal, J. D., "Decoupling Policy From Practices: The case of stock repurchase programs", Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), pp.202~228 (2001)
  40. Organizational Pay Mix: The implications of various theoretical perspectives for the conceptualization and measurement of individual pay components, "Yanadori, Y.", Cornell Univ, ~, pp.Working Paper 02-02 (2002)
  41. Yiu, D.W., "Business Group: An integrated model to focus future research", Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), pp.1551~1579 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)